• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《COVID-19 大流行与经济增长:理论与模拟》

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Economic Growth: Theory and Simulation.

机构信息

School of Finance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 17;9:741525. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.741525. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.741525
PMID:34604164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8484314/
Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic has caused profound consequences on world economy. In order to explore the long-term impact of the pandemic on economic growth and the effects of different policy responses, this paper combines economic theory with epidemiological model to construct an interdisciplinary model, in which labor supply is dynamically constrained by pandemic conditions. Analysis of model equilibrium suggests that outbreaks of infectious disease reduce labor supply and negatively affect economic output. The accumulation of health capital can suppress the spread of disease and improve the recovery rate of infected individuals, which will alleviate the labor supply constraint caused by the pandemic and lead to an increase in output and consumption. The model is then calibrated to Chinese economy. The simulation results imply that government's public health policy can enhance the role of health capital in promoting economic growth. But the marginal effect of certain policies is diminishing. Therefore, the government needs to balance pandemic prevention and control costs and marginal benefits when formulating public health policies. When the pandemic is under control, the resumption of production is feasible and the economic stimulus package could lead to economic recovery.

摘要

新冠疫情大流行对世界经济造成了深远影响。为了探究疫情对经济增长的长期影响,以及不同政策应对的效果,本文将经济学理论与传染病模型相结合,构建了一个跨学科模型,其中劳动力供给受到疫情状况的动态约束。模型均衡分析表明,传染病的爆发会减少劳动力供给,对经济产出产生负面影响。健康资本的积累可以抑制疾病的传播,提高感染者的康复率,从而缓解疫情带来的劳动力供给约束,增加产出和消费。本文进一步对中国经济进行了模型校准。模拟结果表明,政府的公共卫生政策可以增强健康资本在促进经济增长方面的作用。但是,某些政策的边际效应正在递减。因此,政府在制定公共卫生政策时需要平衡疫情防控成本和边际收益。当疫情得到控制时,恢复生产是可行的,经济刺激方案可能会导致经济复苏。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3103/8484314/9a0e74dc5d06/fpubh-09-741525-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3103/8484314/0393deb3a286/fpubh-09-741525-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3103/8484314/9a0e74dc5d06/fpubh-09-741525-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3103/8484314/0393deb3a286/fpubh-09-741525-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3103/8484314/9a0e74dc5d06/fpubh-09-741525-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Economic Growth: Theory and Simulation.《COVID-19 大流行与经济增长:理论与模拟》
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 17;9:741525. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.741525. eCollection 2021.
2
Requestioning the Indonesia Government's Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Black Box Analysis for the Period of January-July 2020.质疑印尼政府对 COVID-19 大流行的公共政策反应:2020 年 1 月至 7 月期间的黑箱分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 10;9:612994. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.612994. eCollection 2021.
3
Rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Vietnam government's experience and preliminary success.应对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应:越南政府的经验与初步成功。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020502.
4
Using Pandemic Data to Examine the Government's Pandemic Prevention Measures and Its Support Policies for Vulnerable Groups.利用大流行数据来审视政府的大流行预防措施及其对弱势群体的支持政策。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 6;10:882872. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.882872. eCollection 2022.
5
PaCAR: COVID-19 Pandemic Control Decision Making via Large-Scale Agent-Based Modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning.PaCAR:通过大规模基于代理的建模和深度强化学习进行 COVID-19 大流行控制决策。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):1064-1077. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221107902. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Trade-Off between COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention and Control and Economic Stimulus.新冠大流行防控与经济刺激之间的权衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13956. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113956.
7
Short-term impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the global and Turkish economy.新冠疫情对全球和土耳其经济的短期影响。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 17;51(SI-1):3182-3193. doi: 10.3906/sag-2106-271.
8
Public health and social measures to mitigate the health and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey, Egypt, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Poland during 2020-2021: situational analysis.2020-2021 年期间,土耳其、埃及、乌克兰、哈萨克斯坦和波兰为减轻 COVID-19 大流行对健康和经济的影响而采取的公共卫生和社会措施:情况分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 17;22(1):991. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13411-6.
9
Standardising policy and technology responses in the immediate aftermath of a pandemic: a comparative and conceptual framework.大流行后立即采取标准化的政策和技术应对措施:比较和概念框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00951-x.
10
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Indirect Costs Arising From COVID-19-Related Work Absenteeism From October 2020 to July 2022: A Retrospective Study From Central Greece.2020年10月至2022年7月因新冠疫情相关缺勤产生的间接成本:来自希腊中部的一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81358. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
A comparative analysis of influenza and COVID-19: Environmental-ecological impacts, socioeconomic implications, and future challenges.流感与新冠病毒的比较分析:环境生态影响、社会经济影响及未来挑战
Biosaf Health. 2024 Oct 23;6(6):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2024.10.001. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Effectiveness of Preprocedural Mouthwashes: A Triple-Blind Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and Regional Income Inequality in China.新冠疫情与中国地区收入不平等
Front Public Health. 2021 May 11;9:687152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.687152. eCollection 2021.
2
An ecological study of the association between neighborhood racial and economic residential segregation with COVID-19 vulnerability in the United States' capital city.美国首都城市邻里间种族和经济居住隔离与 COVID-19 脆弱性之间关联的生态研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Associating the Change in New COVID-19 Cases to GDP per Capita in 38 European Countries in the First Wave of the Pandemic.
术前漱口水的有效性:一项三盲随机对照临床试验。
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):868-876. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.08.017. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
4
Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses among the Adult Population in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using the Health Belief Model.加纳成人中对 COVID-19 疫苗加强针的接受度:使用健康信念模型的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):2673. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20201-9.
5
The relationship between corona disease anxiety and sleep disturbances and suicidal ideation in medical staff: The mediating role of resiliency and cognitive flexibility: A cross-sectional study.医护人员中新冠疾病焦虑与睡眠障碍及自杀意念之间的关系:心理韧性和认知灵活性的中介作用:一项横断面研究
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;7(8):e2282. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2282. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Public health events and economic growth in a neoclassical framework.新古典框架下的公共卫生事件与经济增长
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1724. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19106-4.
7
High altitudes, population density, and poverty: Unraveling the complexities of COVID-19 in Peru during the years 2020-2022.高海拔、人口密度与贫困:剖析2020年至2022年秘鲁新冠疫情的复杂性
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Sep 15;36:102423. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102423. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
The Role of Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis for Understanding COVID-19 Population Severity: A Systematic Review.遥感和地理空间分析在理解 COVID-19 人群严重程度中的作用:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054298.
9
Trade-Off between COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention and Control and Economic Stimulus.新冠大流行防控与经济刺激之间的权衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13956. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113956.
10
Acceptability and Willingness of UAE Residents to Use OTC Vending Machines to Deliver Self-Testing Kits for COVID-19 and the Implications.阿联酋居民对使用非处方自动售货机提供新冠病毒自我检测试剂盒的接受度和意愿及其影响
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Aug 23;15:1759-1770. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S370441. eCollection 2022.
将大流行第一波期间 38 个欧洲国家的人均 GDP 与新增 COVID-19 病例的变化相关联。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 20;8:582140. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.582140. eCollection 2020.
4
Hospitals' responsibility in response to the threat of infectious disease outbreak in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Implications for low- and middle-income countries.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行背景下医院应对传染病爆发威胁的责任:对低收入和中等收入国家的启示
Glob Health J. 2020 Dec;4(4):113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.glohj.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Effects of human mobility restrictions on the spread of COVID-19 in Shenzhen, China: a modelling study using mobile phone data.利用手机数据的建模研究:中国深圳的人类流动限制对 COVID-19 传播的影响
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e417-e424. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30165-5. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
Impacts of social and economic factors on the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China.社会经济因素对中国2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)传播的影响
J Popul Econ. 2020;33(4):1127-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00778-2. Epub 2020 May 9.
7
Modified SEIR and AI prediction of the epidemics trend of COVID-19 in China under public health interventions.公共卫生干预下中国新冠疫情趋势的改进型SEIR模型及人工智能预测
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):165-174. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64.
8
Economic Impact of the 2015 MERS Outbreak on the Republic of Korea's Tourism-Related Industries.2015年中东呼吸综合征疫情对韩国旅游业相关产业的经济影响
Health Secur. 2019 Mar/Apr;17(2):100-108. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0115. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
9
General ecological models for human subsistence, health and poverty.人类生存、健康和贫困的一般生态模型。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;1(8):1153-1159. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0221-8. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
10
Economic growth, urbanization, globalization, and the risks of emerging infectious diseases in China: A review.中国的经济增长、城市化、全球化与新发传染病风险:综述
Ambio. 2017 Feb;46(1):18-29. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0809-2. Epub 2016 Aug 4.