Section of Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Technological Educations, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 May 6;50(8):4315-4328. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab859.
Many prokaryotes encode CRISPR-Cas systems as immune protection against mobile genetic elements (MGEs), yet a number of MGEs also harbor CRISPR-Cas components. With a few exceptions, CRISPR-Cas loci encoded on MGEs are uncharted and a comprehensive analysis of their distribution, prevalence, diversity, and function is lacking. Here, we systematically investigated CRISPR-Cas loci across the largest curated collection of natural bacterial and archaeal plasmids. CRISPR-Cas loci are widely but heterogeneously distributed across plasmids and, in comparison to host chromosomes, their mean prevalence per Mbp is higher and their distribution is distinct. Furthermore, the spacer content of plasmid CRISPRs exhibits a strong targeting bias towards other plasmids, while chromosomal arrays are enriched with virus-targeting spacers. These contrasting targeting preferences highlight the genetic independence of plasmids and suggest a major role for mediating plasmid-plasmid conflicts. Altogether, CRISPR-Cas are frequent accessory components of many plasmids, which is an overlooked phenomenon that possibly facilitates their dissemination across microbiomes.
许多原核生物将 CRISPR-Cas 系统编码为抵御移动遗传元件 (MGE) 的免疫保护机制,但许多 MGE 也拥有 CRISPR-Cas 成分。除了少数例外,MGE 上编码的 CRISPR-Cas 基因座尚未被绘制图谱,并且它们的分布、流行程度、多样性和功能缺乏全面分析。在这里,我们系统地研究了最大的天然细菌和古细菌质粒经过精心整理的集合中的 CRISPR-Cas 基因座。CRISPR-Cas 基因座在质粒中广泛存在,但分布不均,与宿主染色体相比,它们每 Mbp 的平均流行率更高,分布也不同。此外,质粒 CRISPR 的间隔区内容对其他质粒具有强烈的靶向偏好,而染色体阵列则富含针对病毒的靶向间隔区。这些相反的靶向偏好突显了质粒的遗传独立性,并表明其在介导质粒-质粒冲突方面发挥了主要作用。总的来说,CRISPR-Cas 是许多质粒的常见附属成分,这是一个被忽视的现象,可能有助于它们在微生物组中传播。