• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚太结直肠癌筛查评分在韩国的分类能力:癌症筛查队列分析。

The classification capability of the Asia Pacific Colorectal Screening score in Korea: an analysis of the Cancer Screenee Cohort.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021069. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021069. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

DOI:10.4178/epih.e2021069
PMID:34607403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8654505/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to validate a simple risk assessment tool for estimating the advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) risk at colonoscopy screenings and potential factors relevant for implementing this tool in the Korean population.

METHODS

Our study analyzed data from the Cancer Screenee Cohort Study conducted by the National Cancer Center in Korea. The risk level was assessed using the Asia Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score developed by the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. Logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between colorectal-related outcomes and the risk level by APCS score. The discriminatory performance of the APCS score for various colorectal-related outcomes was assessed using C-statistics.

RESULTS

In 12,520 individuals, 317 ACN cases and 4,528 adenoma cases were found. The APCS tool successfully classified the study population into different risk groups, and significant differences in the ACN rate and other outcomes were observed. The APCS score demonstrated acceptable discrimination capability with area under the curve values ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 for various outcomes. The results of the multivariate logistic regression model revealed that the high-risk group had a 3.1-fold higher risk of ACN (95% confidence interval, 2.08 to 4.67) than the average-risk group. Body mass index (BMI) was identified as a significant predictor of ACN in both multivariate and subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlighted significant differences in colorectal-related screening outcomes by colorectal risk level measured using the APCS score, and BMI could be used to improve the discriminatory capability of the APCS score.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证一种简单的风险评估工具,用于评估结肠镜筛查时的高级结直肠腺瘤(ACN)风险,以及在韩国人群中实施该工具的相关潜在因素。

方法

本研究分析了韩国国家癌症中心进行的癌症筛查队列研究的数据。风险水平使用亚太结直肠筛查(APCS)评分进行评估,该评分由亚太结直肠癌工作组开发。使用逻辑回归模型检验 APCS 评分与结直肠相关结局之间的关联。使用 C 统计量评估 APCS 评分对各种结直肠相关结局的判别性能。

结果

在 12520 名个体中,发现 317 例 ACN 病例和 4528 例腺瘤病例。APCS 工具成功地将研究人群分为不同的风险组,并且观察到 ACN 发生率和其他结局的显著差异。APCS 评分对各种结局的曲线下面积值在 0.62 至 0.65 之间,显示出可接受的判别能力。多变量逻辑回归模型的结果表明,高危组的 ACN 风险是平均风险组的 3.1 倍(95%置信区间,2.08 至 4.67)。在多变量和亚组分析中,体重指数(BMI)被确定为 ACN 的显著预测因子。

结论

本研究强调了使用 APCS 评分测量的结直肠风险水平对结直肠相关筛查结局的显著差异,并且 BMI 可用于提高 APCS 评分的判别能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce27/8654505/db6eee13fe79/epih-43-e2021069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce27/8654505/f68588511071/epih-43-e2021069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce27/8654505/db6eee13fe79/epih-43-e2021069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce27/8654505/f68588511071/epih-43-e2021069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce27/8654505/db6eee13fe79/epih-43-e2021069f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The classification capability of the Asia Pacific Colorectal Screening score in Korea: an analysis of the Cancer Screenee Cohort.亚太结直肠癌筛查评分在韩国的分类能力:癌症筛查队列分析。
Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021069. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021069. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
Performance of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score in stratifying the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia: A meta-analysis and systematic review.亚太结直肠筛查评分在分层结直肠高级别瘤变风险中的表现:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jun;39(6):1000-1007. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16523. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
A scoring model for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia in a screened population of asymptomatic Japanese individuals.预测无症状日本人群筛查中结直肠高级别瘤变的评分模型。
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;53(10):1109-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1433-7. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
Development and validation of a risk stratification-based screening model for predicting colorectal advanced neoplasia in Korea.韩国用于预测结直肠高级别瘤变的基于风险分层的筛查模型的开发与验证
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;49(1):41-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000102.
5
Predictors of advanced colorectal neoplasia for colorectal cancer screening.用于结直肠癌筛查的晚期结直肠肿瘤的预测指标。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.008.
6
A modified colorectal screening score for prediction of advanced neoplasia: A prospective study of 5744 subjects.改良结直肠筛查评分预测进展性肿瘤:5744 例前瞻性研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;33(1):187-194. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13835.
7
The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects.亚太结直肠筛查评分:一种经验证的工具,可对无症状亚洲人群结直肠高级别瘤变的风险进行分层。
Gut. 2011 Sep;60(9):1236-41. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.221168. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
8
Improvement of Asia-Pacific colorectal screening score and evaluation of its use combined with fecal immunochemical test.亚太结直肠癌筛查评分的改进及其与粪便免疫化学试验联合应用的评价。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1146-2.
9
Validity of APCS score as a risk prediction score for advanced colorectal neoplasia in Chinese asymptomatic subjects: A prospective colonoscopy study.APCS评分作为中国无症状受试者晚期结直肠肿瘤风险预测评分的有效性:一项前瞻性结肠镜检查研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5123. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005123.
10
An adjusted Asia-Pacific colorectal screening score system to predict advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic Chinese patients.亚太结直肠筛查评分系统调整版预测无症状中国人群中结直肠进展期腺瘤的价值。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02860-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the risk of colorectal cancer among diabetes patients using a random survival forest-guided approach.使用随机生存森林引导方法预测糖尿病患者患结直肠癌的风险。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 30;14:1457446. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1457446. eCollection 2024.
2
Developing a Nomogram for Predicting Colorectal Cancer and Its Precancerous Lesions Based on Data from Three Non-Invasive Screening Tools, APCS, FIT, and sDNA.基于三项非侵入性筛查工具(APCS、FIT和sDNA)的数据开发预测结直肠癌及其癌前病变的列线图。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jun 14;17:2891-2901. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S465286. eCollection 2024.
3
Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for colorectal cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2009-2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Cancer Screening Rates among Korean Men and Women: Results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2018.韩国男性和女性癌症筛查率趋势:2004-2018 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查结果。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):330-338. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.263. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2017.韩国癌症统计数据:2017 年发病率、死亡率、生存率和患病率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):335-350. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.206. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Real-World National Colonoscopy Volume in Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study over 12 Years.
社会经济不平等与结直肠癌的有组织和机会性筛查:来自 2009-2021 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查的结果。
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023086. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2023086. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
4
A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening.亚太地区结直肠癌筛查单一与联合方案、粪便免疫化学检测和粪便脱氧核糖核酸检测用于社区结直肠癌筛查的比较。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Mar 1;16:571-586. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S398997. eCollection 2023.
5
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.风险分层肠道筛查的范围综述:当前证据,未来方向。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
韩国真实世界的结肠镜检查量:一项超过 12 年的全国基于人群的研究。
Gut Liver. 2020 May 15;14(3):338-346. doi: 10.5009/gnl19108.
4
Risk Scores for Predicting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in the Average-risk Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.用于预测一般风险人群中晚期结直肠腺瘤的风险评分:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1788-1800. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0209-2. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
5
Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations.系统评价结直肠癌筛查指南在一般风险成年人中的应用:总结当前全球建议。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):124-138. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124.
6
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查:美国多学会专家组对医生和患者的建议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
7
The CRISP colorectal cancer risk prediction tool: an exploratory study using simulated consultations in Australian primary care.CRISP结直肠癌风险预测工具:一项在澳大利亚初级医疗中使用模拟会诊的探索性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0407-7.
8
Trends in Participation Rates for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2002-2012.2002 - 2012年韩国国家癌症筛查计划的参与率趋势
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;49(3):798-806. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.186. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Validity of APCS score as a risk prediction score for advanced colorectal neoplasia in Chinese asymptomatic subjects: A prospective colonoscopy study.APCS评分作为中国无症状受试者晚期结直肠肿瘤风险预测评分的有效性:一项前瞻性结肠镜检查研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5123. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005123.
10
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.