Suppr超能文献

亚太地区结直肠癌筛查单一与联合方案、粪便免疫化学检测和粪便脱氧核糖核酸检测用于社区结直肠癌筛查的比较。

A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening.

作者信息

Ze Yuan, Tu Huiming, Zhang Lin, Bai Yu, Ren Yilin, Chen Xin, Xue Yuzheng, Sun Renjuan, Yang Yuling, Yang Jie, Zhou Xuan, Liu Li

机构信息

Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People's Republic of China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Mar 1;16:571-586. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S398997. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the screening efficacy of colonoscopy and pathologically confirmed single and combined Asia-Pacific colorectal screening (APCS), faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and stool deoxyribonucleic acid (sDNA) testing protocols.

METHODS

From April 2021 to April 2022, 842 volunteers participated in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings using APCS scoring, FIT and sDNA testing and 115 underwent a colonoscopy. One hundred high-risk participants were then identified from the results of both processes. The differences in the three CRC screening tests in combination with the colonoscopy pathology diagnostics were evaluated using Cochran's Q test, the Dunn-Bonferroni test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value analysis.

RESULTS

Both FIT and sDNA testing demonstrated a 100% performance in detecting CRC. For advanced adenoma, the sensitivity of the FIT + sDNA test scheme (double positive) was 29.2%, and the sensitivities of the combined FIT + sDNA test and APCS scoring + sDNA test schemes were 62.5% and 95.8%, respectively. The FIT + sDNA testing kappa value of advanced colorectal neoplasia was 0.344 ( = 0.011). The sensitivity for nonadvanced adenoma of the APCS score + sDNA test scheme was 91.1%. In terms of positive results, the sensitivity of the APCS score + FIT + sDNA detection protocol was significantly higher than that of the APCS score, FIT, sDNA detection, and FIT + sDNA detection methods (adjusted < 0.001, respectively). For the FIT + sDNA test, the kappa value was 0.220 ( = 0.015) and the AUC was 0.634 ( = 0.037). The specificity of the FIT + sDNA test scheme was 69.0%.

CONCLUSION

The FIT + sDNA test scheme demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy, and the combined APCS score + FIT + sDNA test scheme demonstrated remarkable improvements in CRC screening efficiency and sensitivity for detecting positive lesions.

摘要

目的

比较结肠镜检查与经病理证实的亚太地区结直肠癌筛查(APCS)单项及联合、粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)和粪便脱氧核糖核酸(sDNA)检测方案的筛查效果。

方法

2021年4月至2022年4月,842名志愿者采用APCS评分、FIT和sDNA检测进行原发性结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,115人接受了结肠镜检查。然后从这两个过程的结果中确定100名高危参与者。使用 Cochr an's Q检验、Dunn-Bonferroni检验和受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值分析评估三种CRC筛查试验与结肠镜病理诊断相结合的差异。

结果

FIT和sDNA检测在检测CRC方面的表现均为100%。对于高级别腺瘤,FIT + sDNA检测方案(双阳性)的灵敏度为29.2%,联合FIT + sDNA检测和APCS评分 + sDNA检测方案的灵敏度分别为62.5%和95.8%。高级别结直肠肿瘤的FIT + sDNA检测kappa值为0.344(= 0.011)。APCS评分 + sDNA检测方案对非高级别腺瘤的灵敏度为91.1%。在阳性结果方面,APCS评分 + FIT + sDNA检测方案的灵敏度显著高于APCS评分、FIT、sDNA检测以及FIT + sDNA检测方法(调整后P分别< 0.001)。对于FIT + sDNA检测,kappa值为0.220(= 0.015),AUC为0.634(= 0.037)。FIT + sDNA检测方案的特异性为69.0%。

结论

FIT + sDNA检测方案显示出卓越的诊断效果,联合APCS评分 + FIT + sDNA检测方案在CRC筛查效率和检测阳性病变的灵敏度方面有显著提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a18/9985980/984054ded89f/JMDH-16-571-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验