Suppr超能文献

欧洲专家共识:改善鞘内注射巴氯芬和/或肉毒毒素 A 治疗致残性痉挛患者选择的方法。

European expert consensus on improving patient selection for the management of disabling spasticity with intrathecal baclofen and/or botulinum toxin type A.

机构信息

Neurological department, Rigshospitalet.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2022 Jan 3;54:jrm00241. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2877.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop an algorithm for the selection of adults with disabling spasticity for treatment with intrathecal baclofen (ITB) and/or botulinum toxin type A (BoNT A).

METHODS

A European Advisory Board of 4 neurologists and 4 rehabilitation specialists performed a literature review on ITB and BoNT A treatment for disabling spasticity. An online survey was sent to 125 physicians and 13 non-physician spasticity experts. Information on their current clinical practice and level of agreement on proposed selection criteria was used to inform algorithm design. Consensus was considered reached when ≥75% of respondents agreed or were neutral.

RESULTS

A total of 79 experts from 17 countries completed the on-line survey (57%). Agreement was reached that patients with multi-segmental or generalized disabling spasticity refractory to oral drugs are the best candidates for ITB (96.1% consensus), while those with focal/segmental disabling spasticity are ideal candidates for BoNT A (98.7% consensus). In addition the following are good candidates for ITB (% consensus): bilateral disabling spasticity affecting lower limbs only (97.4%), bilateral (100%) or unilateral (90.9%) disabling spasticity affecting lower limbs and trunk, and unilateral or bilateral disabling spasticity affecting upper and lower extremities (96.1%).

CONCLUSION

This algorithm will support the management of adult patients with disabling spasticity by aiding patient selection for ITB and/or BoNT A treatments.

摘要

目的

制定一种用于选择患有致残性痉挛的成年人接受鞘内巴氯芬(ITB)和/或肉毒毒素 A 型(BoNT A)治疗的算法。

方法

由 4 名神经病学家和 4 名康复专家组成的欧洲顾问委员会对 ITB 和 BoNT A 治疗致残性痉挛的文献进行了回顾。向 125 名医生和 13 名非医生痉挛专家发送了在线调查。利用他们目前的临床实践信息和对拟议选择标准的认同程度来为算法设计提供信息。当≥75%的受访者表示同意或持中立态度时,即达成共识。

结果

来自 17 个国家的 79 名专家完成了在线调查(57%)。专家组达成共识,多节段或全身性致残性痉挛且对口服药物耐药的患者是 ITB 的最佳候选者(96.1%的共识),而局灶性/节段性致残性痉挛患者则是 BoNT A 的理想候选者(98.7%的共识)。此外,以下患者也适合接受 ITB 治疗(%共识):仅影响下肢的双侧致残性痉挛(97.4%)、双侧(100%)或单侧(90.9%)影响下肢和躯干的致残性痉挛,以及单侧或双侧影响上下肢的致残性痉挛(96.1%)。

结论

该算法将有助于选择接受 ITB 和/或 BoNT A 治疗的患者,从而为成年致残性痉挛患者的管理提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bdc/8862646/5d961a546c0e/JRM-54-63-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验