Division of Preventive Cardiology Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic MN.
Division of Epidemiology Department of Quantitative Health SciencesMayo Clinic Rochester MN.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e021356. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021356. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
Background There is wide variability in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) dose (ie, number of sessions) delivered, and no evidence-based recommendations regarding what dose to prescribe. We aimed to test what CR dose impacts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Methods and Results This is an historical cohort study of all patients who had coronary artery disease and who initiated supervised CR between 2002 and 2012 from a single major CR center. CR dose was defined as number of visits including exercise and patient education. Follow-up was performed using record linkage from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. MACEs included acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, ventricular arrhythmias, stroke, revascularization, or all-cause mortality. Dose was analyzed in several ways, including tertiles, categories, and as a continuous variable. Cox models were adjusted for factors associated with dose and MACE. The cohort consisted of 2345 patients, who attended a mean of 12.5±11.1 of 36 prescribed sessions. After a mean follow-up of 6 years, 695 (29.65%) patients had a MACE, including 231 who died. CR dose was inversely associated with MACE (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI]; 0.55-0.91) in those completing ≥20 sessions, when compared with those not exposed to formal exercise sessions (≤1 session; log-rank =0.007). We did not find evidence of nonlinearity (≥0.050), suggesting no minimal threshold nor ceiling. Each additional session was associated with a lower rate of MACE (fully adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]). Greater session frequency was also associated with lower MACE risk (fully adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.94]). Conclusions CR reduces MACEs, but the benefit appears to be linear, with greater risk reduction with higher doses, and no upper threshold.
心脏康复(CR)的剂量(即,疗程数)差异很大,而且没有关于规定剂量的循证建议。我们旨在检验 CR 剂量对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的影响。
这是一项对 2002 年至 2012 年间来自单个主要 CR 中心的所有患有冠心病且开始接受监督性 CR 的患者的历史队列研究。CR 剂量定义为包括运动和患者教育在内的就诊次数。通过罗切斯特流行病学项目的记录链接进行随访。MACE 包括急性心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛、室性心律失常、卒中和血运重建,或全因死亡率。剂量以三分位数、类别和连续变量等多种方式进行分析。Cox 模型调整了与剂量和 MACE 相关的因素。该队列由 2345 例患者组成,他们平均参加了 36 次规定疗程中的 12.5±11.1 次。平均随访 6 年后,695 例(29.65%)患者发生了 MACE,其中 231 例死亡。与未接受正式运动课程的患者相比(≤1 次),完成≥20 次课程的患者的 CR 剂量与 MACE 呈负相关(风险比,0.66[95%CI];0.55-0.91)(对数秩=0.007)。我们没有发现非线性的证据(≥0.050),这表明没有最小阈值或上限。每次增加一次疗程都与 MACE 发生率降低相关(完全调整后的风险比,0.98[95%CI,0.97-0.99])。更高的疗程频率也与较低的 MACE 风险相关(完全调整后的风险比,0.74[95%CI,0.58-0.94])。
CR 可降低 MACE,但益处似乎呈线性,剂量越高,风险降低越大,且无上限。