Suppr超能文献

虚拟现实与传统视野检查在健康人和青光眼患者中的比较。

Virtual Reality-Based and Conventional Visual Field Examination Comparison in Healthy and Glaucoma Patients.

机构信息

ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Ophthalmology, Bern University Hopsital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 4;10(12):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinically evaluate the noninferiority of a custom virtual reality (VR) perimetry system when compared to a clinically and routinely used perimeter on both healthy subjects and glaucoma patients.

METHODS

We use a custom-designed VR perimetry system tailored for visual field testing. The system uses Oculus Quest VR headset (Facebook Technologies, LLC, Bern, Switzerland), that includes a clicker for participant response feedback. A prospective, single center, study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Bern University Hospital (Bern, Switzerland) for 12 months. Of the 114 participants recruited 70 subjects (36 healthy and 34 glaucoma patients with early to moderate visual field loss) were included in the study. Participants underwent perimetry tests on an Octopus 900 (Haag-Streit, Köniz, Switzerland) as well as on the custom VR perimeter. In both cases, standard dynamic strategy (DS) was used in conjunction with the G testing pattern. Collected visual fields (VFs) from both devices were then analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

High mean defect (MD) correlations between the two systems (Spearman, ρ ≥ 0.75) were obtained. The VR system was found to slightly underestimate VF defects in glaucoma subjects (1.4 dB). No significant bias was found with respect to eccentricity or subject age. On average, a similar number of stimuli presentations per VF was necessary when measuring glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that a clinically used perimeter and the proposed VR perimetry system have comparable performances with respect to a number of perimetry parameters in healthy and glaucoma patients with early to moderate visual field loss.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

This suggests that VR perimeters have the potential to assess VFs with high enough confidence, whereby alleviating challenges in current perimetry practices by providing a portable and more accessible visual field test.

摘要

目的

在健康受试者和青光眼患者中,临床评估一种定制虚拟现实(VR)视野计系统与临床常规使用的视野计相比的非劣效性。

方法

我们使用专门设计的定制 VR 视野计系统进行视野测试。该系统使用 Oculus Quest VR 耳机(Facebook Technologies,LLC,瑞士伯尔尼),其中包括一个点击器用于参与者的反应反馈。一项前瞻性、单中心研究在瑞士伯尔尼大学医院(瑞士伯尔尼)眼科系进行了 12 个月。在招募的 114 名参与者中,有 70 名受试者(36 名健康受试者和 34 名早期至中度视野丧失的青光眼患者)被纳入研究。参与者在 Octopus 900(Haag-Streit,Köniz,瑞士)和定制 VR 视野计上进行了视野检查。在这两种情况下,都使用标准动态策略(DS)结合 G 测试模式。然后对来自这两种设备的视野进行分析和比较。

结果

两种系统之间获得了较高的平均缺损(MD)相关性(Spearman,ρ≥0.75)。发现 VR 系统在青光眼患者中略低估了视野缺陷(1.4 dB)。在偏心距或受试者年龄方面没有发现显著的偏差。平均而言,在测量青光眼患者和健康受试者时,需要测量相同数量的刺激呈现。

结论

这项研究表明,在健康和早期至中度视野丧失的青光眼患者中,一种临床使用的视野计和所提出的 VR 视野计系统在许多视野计参数方面具有可比的性能。

翻译后的文本仅作参考,具体翻译结果可能会因上下文、词汇搭配等因素而有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f5/8496417/9a8c91dead08/tvst-10-12-10-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验