Lepow Lauren, Morishita Hirofumi, Yehuda Rachel
Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 20;15:710004. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.710004. eCollection 2021.
As psychedelic compounds gain traction in psychiatry, there is a need to consider the active mechanism to explain the effect observed in randomized clinical trials. Traditionally, biological psychiatry has asked how compounds affect the causal pathways of illness to reduce symptoms and therefore focus on analysis of the pharmacologic properties. In psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy (PAP), there is debate about whether ingestion of the psychedelic alone is thought to be responsible for the clinical outcome. A question arises how the medication and psychotherapeutic intervention together might lead to neurobiological changes that underlie recovery from illness such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This paper offers a framework for investigating the neurobiological basis of PAP by extrapolating from models used to explain how a pharmacologic intervention might create an optimal brain state during which environmental input has enduring effects. Specifically, there are developmental "critical" periods (CP) with exquisite sensitivity to environmental input; the biological characteristics are largely unknown. We discuss a hypothesis that psychedelics may remove the brakes on adult neuroplasticity, inducing a state similar to that of neurodevelopment. In the visual system, progress has been made both in identifying the biological conditions which distinguishes the CP and in manipulating the active ingredients with the idea that we might pharmacologically reopen a critical period in adulthood. We highlight ocular dominance plasticity (ODP) in the visual system as a model for characterizing CP in limbic systems relevant to psychiatry. A CP framework may help to integrate the neuroscientific inquiry with the influence of the environment both in development and in PAP.
随着迷幻化合物在精神病学领域越来越受关注,有必要考虑其作用机制,以解释在随机临床试验中观察到的效果。传统上,生物精神病学关注的是化合物如何影响疾病的因果路径以减轻症状,因此侧重于药理特性分析。在迷幻辅助心理治疗(PAP)中,对于仅摄入迷幻剂是否被认为对临床结果负责存在争议。一个问题是,药物和心理治疗干预如何共同导致神经生物学变化,从而成为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等疾病康复的基础。本文通过借鉴用于解释药物干预如何创造最佳脑状态(在此状态下环境输入具有持久影响)的模型,提供了一个研究PAP神经生物学基础的框架。具体而言,存在对环境输入具有极高敏感性的发育“关键”期(CP);其生物学特征在很大程度上尚不清楚。我们讨论了一个假设,即迷幻剂可能消除对成人神经可塑性的限制,诱导出类似于神经发育的状态。在视觉系统中,在确定区分关键期的生物学条件以及操纵活性成分方面都取得了进展,目的是我们可能在药理学上重新开启成年期的关键期。我们强调视觉系统中的眼优势可塑性(ODP),将其作为表征与精神病学相关的边缘系统中关键期的模型。关键期框架可能有助于将神经科学探究与发育过程及PAP中的环境影响整合起来。