Prieto Guido I
Department of Philosophy I, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
PeerJ. 2021 Sep 20;9:e12161. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12161. eCollection 2021.
After a long hiatus, interest in the morphology of the respiratory organs in apple snails (Ampullariidae, Caenogastropoda) and its functional and evolutionary bearings is making a comeback. The variability in the morphology of the gill and lung and its link to different lifestyles and patterns of air dependency within the Ampullariidae make research on the morphology of the respiratory organs particularly suitable for approaching the evolution of terrestriality in animals. Additionally, morphology is a valuable source of hypotheses regarding the several functions the ampullariid respiratory organs have besides respiration. However, this is an underexplored field that only recently has incorporated ultrastructural and three-dimension visualization tools and in which more research is much needed, particularly, comparisons between species representing the diversity within the Ampullariidae. In this paper, I examine Mueck, Deaton & Lee's (2020a) assessment of the morphology of the gill and lung of and compare it with earlier and contemporary studies on other ampullariid species. I show that Mueck, Deaton & Lee's paper combines significant morphological misinterpretations, conceptual and terminological mistakes, and crucial literature omissions. I also reinterpret their results and point to the similarities and differences between them and available data on other ampullariids.
在长期中断之后,对苹果螺(瓶螺科,新腹足目)呼吸器官形态及其功能和进化关系的研究兴趣正在复苏。鳃和肺形态的变异性及其与瓶螺科内不同生活方式和空气依赖模式的联系,使得对呼吸器官形态的研究特别适合于探讨动物陆地生活习性的进化。此外,形态学是关于瓶螺科呼吸器官除呼吸之外的多种功能的假说的宝贵来源。然而,这是一个尚未充分探索的领域,直到最近才纳入了超微结构和三维可视化工具,并且非常需要更多的研究,特别是对代表瓶螺科多样性的物种进行比较。在本文中,我审视了缪克、迪顿和李(2020a)对[具体物种]鳃和肺形态的评估,并将其与之前和当代对其他瓶螺科物种的研究进行比较。我指出缪克、迪顿和李的论文存在重大的形态学误解、概念和术语错误以及关键文献遗漏。我还重新解读了他们的结果,并指出这些结果与其他瓶螺科物种现有数据之间的异同。