• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对 COVID-19 大流行:欧洲部分社会医疗保险国家 2020 年的初步应对措施。

Tackling the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial responses in 2020 in selected social health insurance countries in Europe.

机构信息

Austrian National Public Health Institute, Stubenring 6, 1010 Vienna, Austria.

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):476-484. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.011
PMID:34627633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9187505/
Abstract

Countries with social health insurance (SHI) systems display some common defining characteristics - pluralism of actors and strong medical associations - that, in dealing with crisis times, may allow for common learnings. This paper analyses health system responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in eight countries representative of SHI systems in Europe (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Switzerland). Data collection and analysis builds on the methodology and content in the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor (HSRM) up to November 2020. We find that SHI funds were, in general, neither foreseen as major stakeholders in crisis management, nor were they represented in crisis management teams. Further, responsibilities in some countries shifted from SHI funds to federal governments. The overall organisation and governance of SHI systems shaped how countries responded to the challenges of the pandemic. For instance, coordinated ambulatory care often helped avoid overburdening hospitals. Decentralisation among local authorities may however represent challenges with the coordination of policies, i.e. coordination costs. At the same time, bottom-up self-organisation of ambulatory care providers is supported by decentralised structures. Providers also increasingly used teleconsultations, which may remain part of standard practice. It is recommended to involve SHI funds actively in crisis management and in preparing for future crisis to increase health system resilience.

摘要

具有社会医疗保险(SHI)制度的国家表现出一些共同的特征 - 参与者的多元化和强大的医疗协会 - 这在应对危机时期可能允许共同学习。本文分析了 COVID-19 大流行期间八个具有代表性的欧洲 SHI 系统国家(奥地利、比利时、法国、德国、卢森堡、荷兰、斯洛文尼亚和瑞士)的卫生系统应对措施。数据收集和分析基于 COVID-19 卫生系统应对监测器(HSRM)的方法和内容,截至 2020 年 11 月。我们发现,一般来说,SHI 基金既不是危机管理的主要利益相关者,也没有代表参加危机管理团队。此外,一些国家的责任从 SHI 基金转移到联邦政府。SHI 系统的整体组织和治理方式塑造了各国应对大流行挑战的方式。例如,协调的门诊护理通常有助于避免医院负担过重。然而,地方当局之间的权力下放可能会给政策协调带来挑战,即协调成本。与此同时,门诊服务提供者的自下而上的自我组织得到了权力下放结构的支持。提供者还越来越多地使用远程咨询,这可能仍然是标准做法的一部分。建议在危机管理中积极吸收 SHI 基金,并为未来的危机做好准备,以提高卫生系统的弹性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/9187505/c4650e95d9fc/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/9187505/0c9058da3017/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/9187505/c4650e95d9fc/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/9187505/0c9058da3017/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/9187505/c4650e95d9fc/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Tackling the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial responses in 2020 in selected social health insurance countries in Europe.应对 COVID-19 大流行:欧洲部分社会医疗保险国家 2020 年的初步应对措施。
Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):476-484. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Social Health Insurance in Europe: Basic Concepts and New Principles.欧洲社会医疗保险:基本概念与新原则。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Aug 1;44(4):665-677. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7530837.
3
Perspective: Lessons from COVID-19 of countries in the European region in light of findings from the health system response monitor.观点:从卫生系统应对监测中获得的结果,来看欧洲区域各国在 COVID-19 方面的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1058729. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058729. eCollection 2022.
4
Moving forward after the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned in primary care from the multi-country PRICOV-19 study.后 COVID-19 大流行时代:多国 PRICOV-19 研究中初级保健的经验教训。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2328716. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2328716. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Accrediting private providers with National Health Insurance to better serve low-income populations in Kenya and Ghana: a qualitative study.为了更好地服务肯尼亚和加纳的低收入人群,为私立医疗机构提供国家医疗保险认证:一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Dec 5;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0893-y.
6
How resilient is health financing policy in Europe to economic shocks? Evidence from the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 global financial crisis.欧洲的卫生融资政策对经济冲击的弹性如何?来自 COVID-19 大流行第一年和 2008 年全球金融危机的证据。
Health Policy. 2022 Jan;126(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
The role of primary care during the pandemic: shared experiences from providers in five European countries.大流行期间的初级保健作用:来自五个欧洲国家提供者的共同经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1054. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09998-0.
8
[Public health services in the COVID-19 pandemic: strategies and practices in selected European neighbouring countries].[新冠疫情期间的公共卫生服务:部分欧洲邻国的策略与实践]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Apr;64(4):472-480. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03295-z. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
9
Organisation of the State, model of health system and COVID-19 health outcomes in six European countries, during the first months of the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020.2020 年 COVID-19 疫情初期,6 个欧洲国家的国家组织、卫生系统模式与 COVID-19 卫生结果。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Sep;36(5):1874-1886. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3271. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
10
France: Health System Review.法国:医疗卫生体制评价。
Health Syst Transit. 2023 Jul;25(3):1-276.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining universal access to acute hospital care in Ireland during the first three months of COVID-19: Lessons from the policy process.审视新冠疫情头三个月爱尔兰急性医院护理的全民可及性:政策进程中的经验教训。
HRB Open Res. 2024 Feb 15;7:4. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13848.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 related in-hospital mortality, ICU admission and mechanical ventilation of 1.4 million patients in Germany and Switzerland, 2019 to 2022.2019年至2022年德国和瑞士140万例患者中与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)相关的院内死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率和机械通气情况比较
Infection. 2025 Jun;53(3):981-989. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02412-9. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing financial incentives during COVID-19: A comparison of provider payment adjustments across 20 countries.在 COVID-19 期间平衡财务激励措施:20 个国家的医疗服务提供者支付调整比较。
Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.015. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
2
A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.加拿大、爱尔兰、英国和美国 2020 年应对 COVID-19 大流行的卫生政策比较。
Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Providing health services effectively during the first wave of COVID-19: A cross-country comparison on planning services, managing cases, and maintaining essential services.
Responding to COVID-19: an exploration of EU country responses and directions for further research.
应对 COVID-19:对欧盟国家应对措施及进一步研究方向的探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11671-z.
4
Cardiac rehabilitation patient perspectives during COVID-19 pandemic: quantitative and qualitative study.新冠疫情期间心脏康复患者的观点:定量与定性研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 30;11:1373684. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1373684. eCollection 2024.
5
Covid-19 vaccination: a mixed methods analysis of health system resilience in Latin America.Covid-19 疫苗接种:对拉丁美洲卫生系统弹性的混合方法分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 12;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02073-4.
6
Adjustments in purchasing arrangements to support the COVID-19 health sector response: evidence from eight middle-income countries.调整采购安排以支持 COVID-19 卫生部门应对措施:来自八个中等收入国家的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Feb 22;39(2):213-223. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad121.
7
The Health Insurance Fund Participates in Controlling the Epidemic: Insights from German Experience in Dealing with the COVID-19 Pandemic.健康保险基金参与疫情防控:德国应对新冠疫情的经验 insights
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Nov 10;16:2391-2404. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S427717. eCollection 2023.
8
Lessons from health insurance responses in counteracting COVID-19: a qualitative comparative analysis of South Korea and three influential countries.医疗保险应对新冠疫情的经验教训:对韩国和三个有影响力国家的定性比较分析
Arch Public Health. 2023 Nov 21;81(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01209-w.
9
Quick adaptation of the organisation of general practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.荷兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间快速调整了一般实践的组织。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Aug 31;24(Suppl 1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02114-5.
10
Treatment cost assessment for COVID-19 inpatients in Shenzhen, China 2020-2021: facts and suggestions.2020-2021 年中国深圳 COVID-19 住院患者的治疗费用评估:事实与建议。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:1066694. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1066694. eCollection 2023.
在 COVID-19 第一波期间有效提供卫生服务:规划服务、管理病例和维持基本服务的跨国比较。
Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Making the case for strong health information systems during a pandemic and beyond.阐述在大流行期间及之后建立强大卫生信息系统的理由。
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;79(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00531-5.
5
Paying hospital specialists: Experiences and lessons from eight high-income countries.支付医院专家薪酬:八个高收入国家的经验与教训。
Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):473-484. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 23.