Liu Chieh-Wen, Ahmed Saeed, Gray Tara, Ma Tianjun, Cho Young-Bin, Neyman Gennady, Chao Samuel, Suh John, Xia Ping
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2021;7(4):309-319.
To investigate whether there is a volume threshold in target volume of brain metastases below which a small cone size and sharp penumbra in Gamma Knife (GK) may provide improved plan quality when compared to Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).
For patients treated on GK SRS for brain metastases in 2018-2019 in our institution, 121 patients with two and three targets were identified. Twenty-six patients with two or three brain metastases (total of 76 lesions) were selected for this study. Two VMAT plans, SmartArc (Pinnacle) and HyperArc (Eclipse), were generated retrospectively for each patient. Plan quality was evaluated based on RTOG conformity index (CI), Paddick gradient index (GI), normal tissue (NT) V12Gy and V4.5Gy. By using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for both VMAT plans (SmartArc and HyperArc) and metrics of RTOG CI and NT V12Gy, we compared GK plans to SmartArc and HyperArc plans separately to determine the threshold volume.
For SmartArc plans, both ROC curve analyses showed a threshold volume of 0.4 cc for both CI and NT V12Gy. For HyperArc plans, the threshold volumes were 0.2 cc for the CI and 0.5 cc for NT V12Gy. GK plans produced improved dose distribution compared to VMAT for targets ≤0.4 cc, but HyperArc was found to have competing results with GK in terms of CI and NT V12Gy. For targets > 0.4 cc, both SmartArc and HyperArc showed better plan quality when compared to the GK plans.
Target volumes ≤0.4 cc may require a small cone size and sharp penumbra in GK while for target volumes >0.4 cc, VMAT-based SRS can provide improved overall plan quality and faster treatment delivery.
研究脑转移瘤靶区体积是否存在一个阈值,低于该阈值时,与基于容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)的立体定向放射外科(SRS)相比,伽玛刀(GK)的小准直器尺寸和锐利半影能否提供更好的计划质量。
对于2018 - 2019年在我院接受GK SRS治疗脑转移瘤的患者,确定了121例有两个和三个靶区的患者。本研究选取了26例有两个或三个脑转移瘤(共76个病灶)的患者。为每位患者回顾性生成两个VMAT计划,即SmartArc(Pinnacle)和HyperArc(Eclipse)。基于放射肿瘤学协作组(RTOG)适形指数(CI)、帕迪克梯度指数(GI)、正常组织(NT)的V12Gy和V4.5Gy评估计划质量。通过对两个VMAT计划(SmartArc和HyperArc)以及RTOG CI和NT V12Gy指标使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,我们分别将GK计划与SmartArc和HyperArc计划进行比较以确定阈值体积。
对于SmartArc计划,两条ROC曲线分析均显示CI和NT V12Gy的阈值体积均为0.4 cc。对于HyperArc计划,CI的阈值体积为0.2 cc,NT V12Gy的阈值体积为0.5 cc。对于体积≤0.4 cc的靶区,与VMAT相比,GK计划产生了更好的剂量分布,但在CI和NT V12Gy方面,发现HyperArc与GK存在竞争结果。对于体积>0.4 cc的靶区,与GK计划相比,SmartArc和HyperArc均显示出更好的计划质量。
对于体积≤0.4 cc的靶区,GK可能需要小准直器尺寸和锐利半影,而对于体积>0.4 cc的靶区,基于VMAT的SRS可以提供更好的总体计划质量和更快的治疗实施。