Suppr超能文献

用于治疗心动过缓的左束支区域起搏与右心室起搏的手术时间和透视时间比较:新型起搏策略的学习曲线

Comparison of Procedure and Fluoroscopy Time Between Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Right Ventricular Pacing for Bradycardia: The Learning Curve for the Novel Pacing Strategy.

作者信息

Wang Zhao, Zhu Haojie, Li Xiaofei, Yao Yan, Liu Zhimin, Fan Xiaohan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 23;8:695531. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695531. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing approach. To assess learning curve for LBBAP and compare the procedure and fluoroscopy time between LBBAP and right ventricular pacing (RVP). Consecutive bradycardia patients who underwent LBBAP or RVP were prospectively recruited from June 2018 to June 2020. The procedure and fluoroscopy time for ventricular lead placement, pacing parameters, and periprocedural complications were recorded. Restricted cubic splines were used to fit learning curves for LBBAP. Left bundle branch area pacing was successful in 376 of 406 (92.6%) patients while 313 patients received RVP. Learning curve for LBBAP illustrated initial (1-50 cases), improved (51-150 cases), and stable stages (151-406 cases) with gradually increased success rates (88.0 vs. 90.0 vs. 94.5%, = 0.106), steeply decreased median procedure (26.5 vs. 14.0 vs. 9.0min, < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (16.0 vs. 6.0 vs. 4.0min, < 0.001), and shortened stimulus to left ventricular activation time (Sti-LVAT; 78.7 vs. 78.1 vs. 71.2 ms, < 0.001). LBBAP at the stable stage showed longer but close median procedure (9.0 vs. 6.9min, < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (4.0 vs. 2.8min, < 0.001) compared with RVP. The procedure and fluoroscopy time of LBBAP could be reduced significantly with increasing procedure volume and close to that of RVP for an experienced operator.

摘要

左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)是一种新型的生理性起搏方法。旨在评估LBBAP的学习曲线,并比较LBBAP与右心室起搏(RVP)之间的手术过程和透视时间。2018年6月至2020年6月前瞻性招募了接受LBBAP或RVP的连续性心动过缓患者。记录心室导线植入的手术过程和透视时间、起搏参数及围手术期并发症。采用受限立方样条拟合LBBAP的学习曲线。406例患者中有376例(92.6%)LBBAP成功,313例患者接受了RVP。LBBAP的学习曲线显示出初始阶段(1 - 50例)、改善阶段(51 - 150例)和稳定阶段(151 - 406例),成功率逐渐提高(88.0%对90.0%对94.5%,P = 0.106),中位手术时间大幅缩短(26.5分钟对14.0分钟对9.0分钟,P < 0.001),透视时间缩短(16.0分钟对6.0分钟对4.0分钟,P < 0.001),刺激至左心室激动时间(Sti - LVAT)缩短(78.7毫秒对78.1毫秒对71.2毫秒,P < 0.001)。与RVP相比,稳定阶段的LBBAP中位手术时间更长但相近(9.0分钟对6.9分钟,P < 0.001),透视时间更长(4.0分钟对2.8分钟,P < 0.001)。随着手术量增加,LBBAP的手术过程和透视时间可显著缩短,对于经验丰富的操作者,可接近RVP的水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/8494944/4534790fb99c/fcvm-08-695531-g0001.jpg

相似文献

2
Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing in older patients.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Oct;47(10):1346-1357. doi: 10.1111/pace.15056. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing.
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Aug;42(8):768-773. doi: 10.1002/clc.23215. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads.
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 May 18;2023:3632257. doi: 10.1155/2023/3632257. eCollection 2023.
6
The Implantation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with and without Bundle Branch Block.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Nov;31(11):1268-1272. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.11.1268.
7
Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 8;8:685253. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.685253. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Implantation.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2025 May 15;16(5):6284-6291. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2025.16055. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Understanding LOT-CRT: Current Insights, Limitations, and Our Center's Experience.
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 27;14(9):3025. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093025.
4
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septal Pacing: Mid-term Results and Learning Curve.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024 Dec 15;15(12):6113-6121. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15123. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Sep 13;13:e14. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.18. eCollection 2024.
6
Predictors of success in left bundle branch area pacing with stylet-driven pacing leads: a multicenter investigation.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 23;11:1449859. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1449859. eCollection 2024.
7
Implantable Cardiac Devices in Patients with Brady- and Tachy-Arrhythmias: An Update of the Literature.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 11;25(5):162. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2505162. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Conduction System Pacing: Have We Finally Found the Holy Grail of Physiological Pacing?
Heart Int. 2023 Dec 1;17(2):2-5. doi: 10.17925/HI.2023.17.2.2. eCollection 2023.
9
Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing for patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 30;10:1246846. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1246846. eCollection 2023.
10
Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia.
J Arrhythm. 2023 Aug 3;39(5):766-775. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12906. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 8;8:685253. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.685253. eCollection 2021.
2
Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;7(9):1166-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Long-Term Safety and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Large Single-Center Study.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009261. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
Pros and Cons of Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Single-Center Experience.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;13(12):e008874. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008874. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
Comparison of Left Bundle Branch and His Bundle Pacing in Bradycardia Patients.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Oct;6(10):1291-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
7
Simplifying Physiological Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using a New Nine-Partition Method.
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;37(2):329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 16.
8
A novel 9-partition method using fluoroscopic images for guiding left bundle branch pacing.
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Oct;17(10):1759-1767. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Short-term and intermediate-term performance and safety of left bundle branch pacing.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1472-1481. doi: 10.1111/jce.14463. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
Electrophysiological characteristics and clinical values of left bundle branch current of injury in left bundle branch pacing.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):834-842. doi: 10.1111/jce.14377. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验