• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用无腔导线在心动过缓患者中进行左束支区域起搏时植入失败的预测因素。

Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia.

作者信息

Kato Hiroyuki, Sato Toshiaki, Shimeno Kenji, Mito Shinji, Nishida Taku, Soejima Kyoko

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital Nagoya Japan.

Division of Advanced Arrhythmia Management Kyorin University School of Medicine Mitaka Japan.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2023 Aug 3;39(5):766-775. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12906. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/joa3.12906
PMID:37799795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10549844/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP.

METHODS

LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker indications for bradyarrhythmia, which were mainly atrioventricular block (AVB) (68.1%) and sick sinus syndrome (26.7%). Procedural success and electrophysiological and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

LBBAP was successful in 247 (86.7%) patients. Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was confirmed in 54.7% of the population. The primary reasons for procedural failure were the inability of the pacemaker lead to penetrate deep into the septum (76.3%) and failure to achieve shortening of stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time in lead V6 (18.4%). Thickened interventricular septum (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-5.35), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.22-64.06), and intraventricular conduction delay (OR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.32-28.75) were preoperative predictors of procedural failure. The capture threshold and ventricular amplitude remained stable, and no major complications occurred throughout the 2-year follow-up. In patients with ventricular pacing burden >40%, the LV ejection fraction remained high regardless of LBB capture.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful LBBAP was affected by abnormal cardiac anatomy and intraventricular conduction. LBBAP is feasible and safe as a primary strategy for patients with AVB, depending on ventricular pacing.

摘要

背景

左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)是一种新型的传导系统起搏技术。在这项多中心研究中,我们旨在评估LBBAP的手术成功率、安全性以及手术失败的术前预测因素。

方法

对285例有缓慢性心律失常起搏器植入指征的患者尝试进行LBBAP,这些患者主要为房室传导阻滞(AVB)(68.1%)和病态窦房结综合征(26.7%)。评估手术成功率以及电生理和超声心动图参数。

结果

247例(86.7%)患者LBBAP成功。54.7%的人群证实左束支(LBB)夺获。手术失败的主要原因是起搏器导线无法深入穿透间隔(76.3%)以及未能实现V6导联刺激至左心室(LV)激动时间缩短(18.4%)。室间隔增厚(比值比[OR],2.48;95%置信区间[CI],1.15 - 5.35)、严重三尖瓣反流(OR,8.84;95% CI,1.22 - 64.06)和室内传导延迟(OR,8.16;95% CI,2.32 - 28.75)是手术失败的术前预测因素。在整个2年随访期间,夺获阈值和心室振幅保持稳定,未发生重大并发症。在心室起搏比例>40%的患者中,无论LBB是否夺获,LV射血分数均保持较高水平。

结论

LBBAP成功受心脏解剖结构异常和室内传导的影响。对于AVB患者,根据心室起搏情况,LBBAP作为主要策略是可行且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/4b119eb97d71/JOA3-39-766-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/82b6bc8b158b/JOA3-39-766-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/a58eab210eb2/JOA3-39-766-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/a0e312328ca5/JOA3-39-766-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/4b119eb97d71/JOA3-39-766-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/82b6bc8b158b/JOA3-39-766-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/a58eab210eb2/JOA3-39-766-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/a0e312328ca5/JOA3-39-766-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf3a/10549844/4b119eb97d71/JOA3-39-766-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia.使用无腔导线在心动过缓患者中进行左束支区域起搏时植入失败的预测因素。
J Arrhythm. 2023 Aug 3;39(5):766-775. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12906. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.前瞻性评估左束支区域起搏的可行性及电生理和超声心动图特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.
3
Predictors of success in left bundle branch area pacing with stylet-driven pacing leads: a multicenter investigation.使用探丝驱动起搏导线进行左束支区域起搏成功的预测因素:一项多中心研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 23;11:1449859. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1449859. eCollection 2024.
4
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction disease: A prospective multicenter study.左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导疾病患者:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Sep;19(9):1484-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.033. Epub 2022 May 10.
5
Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS study.左束支区域起搏的临床结局:多中心欧洲 MELOS 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):4161-4173. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac445.
6
Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study.左束支区域起搏的初步经验、安全性和可行性:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;6(14):1773-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in patients with septal hypertrophy.间隔肥厚患者行左束支区域起搏的可行性和安全性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2255-2261. doi: 10.1111/jce.16073. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
8
A single-centre prospective evaluation of left bundle branch area pacemaker implantation characteristics.左束支区域起搏器植入特征的单中心前瞻性评估
Neth Heart J. 2022 May;30(5):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01679-7. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Achievement rate and learning curve of left bundle branch capture in left bundle branch area pacing procedure performed to demonstrate output-dependent QRS transition.在左束支区域起搏程序中实现左束支捕获的达成率和学习曲线,以证明输出依赖性 QRS 过渡。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):2183-2191. doi: 10.1111/jce.15627. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
10
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect.永久性左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导阻滞:可行性、安全性和急性效应。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1766-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using the Sheath-In-Sheath Technique in a Patient With Right Atrial Enlargement and Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring.在一名患有右心房扩大和三尖瓣环成形术环的患者中使用鞘中鞘技术成功进行左束支区域起搏。
J Arrhythm. 2025 Aug 21;41(4):e70180. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70180. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
JCS/JHRS 2024 Guideline Focused Update on Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2024年心律失常管理指南重点更新》
J Arrhythm. 2025 Jun 16;41(3):e70033. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70033. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with severe interventricular septal hypertrophy: A multicenter study assessing feasibility, safety, and outcomes of lumenless and stylet-driven leads.

本文引用的文献

1
2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.2023 年 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS 心脏生理起搏指南:预防和减轻心力衰竭。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Sep;20(9):e17-e91. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538. Epub 2023 May 20.
2
EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: executive summary. Endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS) and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).EHRA 临床共识声明:关于心脏传导系统起搏植入的专家共识——执行摘要。本共识由亚太心脏节律学会(APHRS)、加拿大心脏节律学会(CHRS)和拉丁美洲心脏节律学会(LAHRS)共同认可。
Europace. 2023 Apr 15;25(4):1237-1248. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad044.
3
严重室间隔肥厚患者的左束支区域起搏:一项评估无腔和导丝驱动导线的可行性、安全性及结局的多中心研究
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Feb 28;6(5):588-597. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.018. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Feasibility of left bundle branch area pacing with left axillary pacemaker implantation in a young female patient with heart failure.在一名年轻女性心力衰竭患者中植入左腋部起搏器进行左束支区域起搏的可行性。
J Arrhythm. 2025 Feb 7;41(1):e70022. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70022. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Predictors of success in left bundle branch area pacing with stylet-driven pacing leads: a multicenter investigation.使用探丝驱动起搏导线进行左束支区域起搏成功的预测因素:一项多中心研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 23;11:1449859. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1449859. eCollection 2024.
6
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Relatively High His-Bundle Capture Threshold After Permanent His-Bundle Pacing - A Multicenter Clinical Study.永久性希氏束起搏后希氏束夺获阈值相对较高患者的长期预后——一项多中心临床研究
Circ Rep. 2024 Jul 12;6(8):294-302. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0035. eCollection 2024 Aug 9.
Conduction system pacing: Current status and prospects.传导系统起搏:现状与展望。
J Cardiol. 2023 May;81(5):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
Predictors of procedural failure of left bundle branch pacing in scarred left ventricle.瘢痕化左心室中左束支起搏手术失败的预测因素
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):760-764. doi: 10.1111/jce.15853. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS study.左束支区域起搏的临床结局:多中心欧洲 MELOS 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):4161-4173. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac445.
6
Masked right bundle branch conduction delay pattern during left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏时的隐匿性右束支传导延迟模式
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Dec;19(12):2027-2029. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.029. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
The initial experience of left bundle branch area pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.肥厚型心肌病患者左束支区域起搏的初步经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep;45(9):1065-1074. doi: 10.1111/pace.14563. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
Achievement rate and learning curve of left bundle branch capture in left bundle branch area pacing procedure performed to demonstrate output-dependent QRS transition.在左束支区域起搏程序中实现左束支捕获的达成率和学习曲线,以证明输出依赖性 QRS 过渡。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):2183-2191. doi: 10.1111/jce.15627. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
9
Electrophysiological characteristics of septal perforation during left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏期间间隔穿孔的电生理特征
Heart Rhythm. 2022 May;19(5):728-734. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
10
Comparison of Procedure and Fluoroscopy Time Between Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Right Ventricular Pacing for Bradycardia: The Learning Curve for the Novel Pacing Strategy.用于治疗心动过缓的左束支区域起搏与右心室起搏的手术时间和透视时间比较:新型起搏策略的学习曲线
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 23;8:695531. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695531. eCollection 2021.