Cano Óscar, Pooter Jan De, Zanon Francesco
Unidad de Arritmias, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe Valencia, Spain.
Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV) Madrid, Spain.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Sep 13;13:e14. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.18. eCollection 2024.
Stylet-driven leads have been recently introduced for conduction system pacing, while most of the previous experience has been obtained with lumenless leads. Design and structural characteristics of both lead types are significantly different, resulting in different implant techniques and independent learning curves. Lead performance appears to be comparable, whereas data on direct comparison of clinical outcomes are scarce. Currently, there are no specific clinical scenarios favouring the use of one lead type over another and the decision should rely on the individual experience of the implanter.
最近已引入用于传导系统起搏的探丝驱动导线,而之前的大多数经验是通过无腔导线获得的。两种导线类型的设计和结构特征有显著差异,导致植入技术不同且学习曲线相互独立。导线性能似乎相当,而关于临床结果直接比较的数据却很少。目前,没有特定的临床情况表明哪种导线类型更具优势,决策应基于植入者的个人经验。