• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌化疗期间的电子患者报告结局监测:实用临床试验(AFT-39)中的嵌套队列。

Electronic patient-reported outcomes monitoring during lung cancer chemotherapy: A nested cohort within the PRO-TECT pragmatic trial (AFT-39).

机构信息

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2021 Dec;162:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.020
PMID:34634754
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients with lung cancer have high symptom burden and diminished quality of life. Electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) platforms deliver repeated longitudinal surveys via web or telephone to patients and alert clinicians about concerning symptoms. This study aims to determine feasibility of electronic PRO monitoring in lung cancer patients receiving treatment in community settings.

METHODS

Adults receiving treatment for advanced or metastatic lung cancer at 26 community sites were invited to participate in a prospective trial of weekly electronic PRO symptom monitoring for 12 months (NCT03249090). Surveys assessing patients' satisfaction with the electronic PRO system were administered at 3 months. Descriptive statistics were generated for demographics, survey completion rates, symptom occurrence, and provider PRO alert management approaches. Pairwise relationships between symptom items were evaluated using intra-individual repeated-measures correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Lung cancer patients (n = 118) participating in electronic PROs were older (mean 64.4 vs 61.9 years, p = 0.03), had worse performance status (p = 0.002), more comorbidities (p = 0.02), and less technology experience than patients with other cancers. Of delivered weekly PRO surveys over 12 months, 91% were completed. Nearly all (97%) patients reported concerning (i.e., severe or worsening) symptoms during participation, with 33% of surveys including concerning symptoms. Pain was the most frequent and longest lasting symptom and was associated with reduced activity level. More than half of alerts to clinicians for concerning symptoms led to intervention. The majority (87%) would recommend using electronic PRO monitoring to other lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Remote longitudinal weekly monitoring of patients with lung cancer using validated electronic PRO surveys was feasible in a multicenter, community-based pragmatic study. A high symptom burden specific to lung cancer was detected and clinician outreach in response to alerts was frequent, suggesting electronic PROs may be a beneficial strategy for identifying actionable symptoms and allow opportunities to optimize well-being in this population.

摘要

目的

肺癌患者的症状负担高,生活质量下降。电子患者报告结局(PRO)平台通过网络或电话向患者提供重复的纵向调查,并向临床医生发出有关症状的警报。本研究旨在确定在社区环境中接受治疗的肺癌患者中电子 PRO 监测的可行性。

方法

邀请 26 个社区站点接受晚期或转移性肺癌治疗的成年人参加一项为期 12 个月的每周电子 PRO 症状监测前瞻性试验(NCT03249090)。在 3 个月时进行电子 PRO 系统满意度调查。对人口统计学数据、调查完成率、症状发生情况以及提供者 PRO 警报管理方法进行描述性统计分析。使用个体内重复测量相关系数评估症状项目之间的两两关系。

结果

参与电子 PRO 的肺癌患者(n=118)年龄较大(平均 64.4 岁比 61.9 岁,p=0.03),功能状态较差(p=0.002),合并症更多(p=0.02),技术经验较少比其他癌症患者。在 12 个月的每周 PRO 调查中,完成了 91%的调查。近 100%(97%)的患者在参与期间报告了令人担忧(即严重或恶化)的症状,其中 33%的调查包括令人担忧的症状。疼痛是最常见和持续时间最长的症状,与活动水平降低有关。超过一半的临床医生对令人担忧的症状发出警报后进行了干预。大多数(87%)患者会向其他肺癌患者推荐使用电子 PRO 监测。

结论

在一项多中心、基于社区的实用研究中,使用经过验证的电子 PRO 调查对肺癌患者进行远程纵向每周监测是可行的。检测到肺癌特有的高症状负担,并且针对警报进行的临床医生外展非常频繁,这表明电子 PRO 可能是识别可操作症状的有益策略,并为改善该人群的幸福感提供机会。

相似文献

1
Electronic patient-reported outcomes monitoring during lung cancer chemotherapy: A nested cohort within the PRO-TECT pragmatic trial (AFT-39).肺癌化疗期间的电子患者报告结局监测:实用临床试验(AFT-39)中的嵌套队列。
Lung Cancer. 2021 Dec;162:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Symptom monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes during cancer treatment: final results of the PRO-TECT cluster-randomized trial.癌症治疗期间通过电子患者报告结局进行症状监测:PRO-TECT整群随机试验的最终结果
Nat Med. 2025 Apr;31(4):1225-1232. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03507-y. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
4
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.
5
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.利用利益相关者参与克服癌症护理提供中实施患者报告结局(PROs)的障碍:来自 3 项前瞻性研究的方法。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S92-S99. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001103.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

引用本文的文献

1
Remote monitoring in older adults with cancer, opportunities and challenges: a narrative review.老年癌症患者的远程监测:机遇与挑战——一篇叙述性综述
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Aug 20;37(1):249. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03161-x.
2
Comparison of Electronic Surveillance With Routine Monitoring for Patients With Lymphoma at High Risk of Relapse: Prospective Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial (Sentinel Lymphoma).电子监测与常规监测在复发高危淋巴瘤患者中的比较:前瞻性随机对照3期试验(哨兵淋巴瘤)
JMIR Cancer. 2025 May 6;11:e65960. doi: 10.2196/65960.
3
Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Utility and User Perceptions of a Digital System for Electronic Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Care: Findings From the PRO-TECT Trial.常规癌症护理中电子患者报告症状监测数字系统的临床实用性和用户认知:来自 PRO-TECT 试验的结果。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Oct;4:947-957. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00081.
2
Feasibility and delivery of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice among racially diverse bladder and prostate cancer patients.在不同种族的膀胱癌和前列腺癌患者的临床实践中报告患者结果的可行性和结果。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jan;39(1):77.e1-77.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
使用电子患者报告结局指标评估转移性肾细胞癌患者:一项叙述性综述。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jan 17;29(1):E17-E27. doi: 10.1188/25.CJON.E17-E27.
4
Influence of symptom burden on social alienation in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: the chain mediating effect of perceived social support and positive psychological capital.症状负担对接受化疗的肺癌患者社会疏离感的影响:领悟社会支持与积极心理资本的链式中介作用
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 4;13(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02403-x.
5
A Qualitative Study of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring After Thoracic Surgery.胸腔手术后电子患者报告结局症状监测的定性研究。
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:744-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.051. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
6
Patient motivators of postoperative electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring use in thoracic surgery patients: a qualitative study.术后电子患者报告结局症状监测在胸外科患者中的使用:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 25;8(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00766-0.
7
Longitudinal assessment of real-world patient adherence: a 12-month electronic patient-reported outcomes follow-up of women with early breast cancer undergoing treatment.真实世界患者依从性的纵向评估:12 个月电子患者报告结局随访早期乳腺癌治疗女性患者的依从性。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 14;32(6):344. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08547-7.
8
Patient-reported outcomes used actively in cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment: A mini-review of the Danish landscape.在接受抗肿瘤治疗的癌症患者中积极使用的患者报告结局:丹麦情况的小型综述。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Dec 3;24:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.11.054. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Interventions for Concerning Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.常规癌症护理中关注患者报告结局的干预措施:系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):1148-1170. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14576-z. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
10
Pain experience of lung cancer patients during home recovery after surgery: A qualitative descriptive study.肺癌患者术后居家康复期的疼痛体验:一项定性描述性研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Oct;12(19):20212-20223. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6616. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings.
采用实施科学方法在常规护理环境中实施和评估患者报告的结果测量(PROM)措施。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3015-3033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Impact of Standardized Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Use on Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization: Results of a Population-Based Retrospective Matched Cohort Analysis.标准化埃德蒙顿症状评估系统应用对急诊科就诊和住院的影响:基于人群的回顾性匹配队列分析结果。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Sep;16(9):e958-e965. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00660. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Oncology Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间的肿瘤学实践
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2005-2006. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6236.
6
US Food and Drug Administration review of statistical analysis of patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer clinical trials approved between January, 2008, and December, 2017.美国食品和药物管理局对 2008 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间批准的肺癌临床试验中患者报告结局的统计分析进行评估。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):e582-e589. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30335-3. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Patient free text reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical research using the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).使用美国国家癌症研究所的患者报告结局版常见不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE),对癌症临床研究中的症状性不良事件进行患者自由文本报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Apr 1;26(4):276-285. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy169.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Surveillance in Patients With Lung Cancer.基于网络的肺癌患者报告结局监测的成本效益分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jun;14(6):1012-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
9
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care.患者报告结局在常规医疗中的应用
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:122-134. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200383.
10
Feasibility of Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events via the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a Chemoradiotherapy Cooperative Group Multicenter Clinical Trial.在一项放化疗协作组多中心临床试验中,通过患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)让患者报告症状性不良事件的可行性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.