• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期卵巢癌治疗的新范式:区分需要新辅助治疗的患者与初始肿瘤细胞减灭术患者。

A New Paradigm in Managing Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Differentiating Patients Requiring Neoadjuvant Treatment from Primary Cytoreduction.

作者信息

Kraus Francois, El Hajj Houssein, Le Deley Marie-Cécile, Aissaoui Othman, Gachon Bertrand, Chevalier Annick, Abdeddaim Cyril, Lemaire Anne-Sophie, Ben Haj Amor Mariem, Sylla Dienabou, Leblanc Eric, Narducci Fabrice, Hudry Delphine

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Center, 80000 Amiens-Picardie, France.

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, 59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;13(19):4925. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194925.

DOI:10.3390/cancers13194925
PMID:34638409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8508489/
Abstract

Our study aims to evaluate the comparability of primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) patients. This single-center retrospective study includes all patients treated for advanced stages high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) between 2007 and 2017. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared after a propensity score matching analysis. Of the 221 patients included, 38% underwent PDS, and 62% received NACT. There was no age difference at diagnosis; however, CA125 levels, PCI score levels, and rates of stage IV were higher in the NACT group. There were no differences concerning the rate and the severity of complications ( = 0.29). The propensity score distribution showed a broad distinction between PDS patients and NACT patients with no significant overlap. Survival analyses demonstrate, after a median follow-up of 66.5 months, an overall survival (OS) of 105.9 and progression-free survival (PFS) of 29.2 months in the PDS group, compared to OS of 52.8 and PFS of 18.9 months in the NACT group. Advanced HGSOC is a heterogeneous population, in which inoperable patients should be differentiated from PDS patients based on many factors, primarily tumor burden.

摘要

我们的研究旨在评估初次肿瘤细胞减灭术(PDS)和新辅助化疗(NACT)患者的可比性。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2007年至2017年间所有接受晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSOC)治疗的患者。在进行倾向评分匹配分析后,对术前特征和术后结果进行了比较。在纳入的221例患者中,38%接受了PDS,62%接受了NACT。诊断时年龄无差异;然而,NACT组的CA125水平、PCI评分水平和IV期比例更高。并发症的发生率和严重程度无差异(P = 0.29)。倾向评分分布显示PDS患者和NACT患者之间存在明显差异,无显著重叠。生存分析表明,在中位随访66.5个月后,PDS组的总生存期(OS)为105.9个月,无进展生存期(PFS)为29.2个月,而NACT组的OS为52.8个月,PFS为18.9个月。晚期HGSOC是一个异质性群体,其中无法手术的患者应根据多种因素,主要是肿瘤负荷,与PDS患者区分开来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f619/8508489/8008b20cba11/cancers-13-04925-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f619/8508489/4cb9348b9d4e/cancers-13-04925-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f619/8508489/fe775d8338c2/cancers-13-04925-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f619/8508489/8008b20cba11/cancers-13-04925-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f619/8508489/4cb9348b9d4e/cancers-13-04925-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f619/8508489/fe775d8338c2/cancers-13-04925-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f619/8508489/8008b20cba11/cancers-13-04925-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Paradigm in Managing Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Differentiating Patients Requiring Neoadjuvant Treatment from Primary Cytoreduction.晚期卵巢癌治疗的新范式:区分需要新辅助治疗的患者与初始肿瘤细胞减灭术患者。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;13(19):4925. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194925.
2
Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.高级别晚期卵巢癌的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与初次新辅助化疗:生存比较。
Radiol Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;52(3):307-319. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0030.
3
[Analysis of factors related to the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer].[晚期卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术的预后获益相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 25;56(6):385-392. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201207-00871.
4
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center.综合性癌症中心晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗及初次肿瘤细胞减灭术的应用情况
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Mar;140(3):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
5
Clinical outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗的临床疗效
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;144(3):474-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.12.017. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
6
An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).分析同期接受根治性手术(PDS)与新辅助化疗(NACT)随机 EORTC-NCIC 试验的大块晚期卵巢、输卵管和腹膜癌患者。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jan;124(1):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
7
Primary surgery or interval debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: does it matter?晚期上皮性卵巢癌的初次手术或间隔减瘤术:有关系吗?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Oct;24(8):1420-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000241.
8
Cost-utility comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer in patients 65 years old or older.新辅助化疗与初次肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗65岁及以上晚期卵巢癌患者的成本效用比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):763.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.053. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
9
Comparison of survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers in phase III randomised trial.在 III 期随机试验中比较 III/IV 期卵巢癌、输卵管癌和腹膜癌的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术和新辅助化疗的生存情况。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;130:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.020. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
Study of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer, SGOG SUNNY (SOC-2) trial concept.前瞻性手术与新辅助化疗后间隔减瘤手术治疗 IIIC 期和 IV 期卵巢癌患者的研究,SGOG SUNNY(SOC-2)试验方案。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(5):e86. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e86.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients with macroscopic lymph node metastasis expect poor prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on a single gynecological team.晚期卵巢癌患者经新辅助化疗后出现宏观淋巴结转移,预后较差:一项基于单一妇科团队的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 6;25(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14237-2.
2
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Heterogeneity, Prognostic Impact, and Relationship with Immune Checkpoints.上皮性卵巢癌中的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs):异质性、预后影响及与免疫检查点的关系
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 29;14(21):5332. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215332.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.新辅助化疗在手术前与手术后化疗用于晚期卵巢上皮癌的初始治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 30;7(7):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub6.
2
Emerging Trends in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer.卵巢癌新辅助化疗的新趋势
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 5;13(4):626. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040626.
3
Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.
晚期卵巢上皮癌初始治疗中化疗与手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 5;2(2):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub5.
4
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Propensity score matching confirms that primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy result in equivalent survival within a comprehensive cohort of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.倾向评分匹配证实,在高级别浆液性卵巢癌的综合患者队列中,初次手术或新辅助化疗的生存结果相当。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.035. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Survival outcomes after delayed cytoreduction surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗后延迟细胞减灭术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1935-1942. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001658. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION-NCT01461850).随机试验原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌(SCORPION-NCT01461850)。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1657-1664. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001640. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Estimated global cancer incidence in the oldest adults in 2018 and projections to 2050.2018 年全球最老年人群癌症发病率的估计数及 2050 年预测。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;148(3):601-608. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33232. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Incidence and mortality of ovarian cancer at the global, regional, and national levels, 1990-2017.1990-2017 年全球、区域和国家层面卵巢癌的发病率和死亡率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):239-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
10
The current status of secondary cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: a systematic review.卵巢癌二次细胞减灭术的现状:系统评价。
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2020 Jun;18(6):332-343.