• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简单的一次性气味识别测试可预测 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。

Simple Disposable Odor Identification Tests for Predicting SARS-CoV-2 Positivity.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.

UHE Satellite Campus, University of Humanities and Economics, 01-513 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(19):10185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910185.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph181910185
PMID:34639486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8507979/
Abstract

Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common manifestation of COVID-19 and may be useful for screening. Survey-based olfactory evaluation tends to underestimate the prevalence of OD, while psychophysical olfactory testing during a pandemic has the disadvantage of being time consuming, expensive, and requiring standardized laboratory settings. We aimed to develop a quick, simple, affordable, and reliable test to objectively assess the prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of OD in COVID-19. The olfactory function of 64 COVID-19 inpatients and 34 controls was evaluated using a questionnaire and a simple disposable odor identification test (SDOIT) developed for this study. Four SDOIT models were assessed: 10-SDOIT, 9-SDOIT, 8-SDOIT, and 4-SDOIT, with 10, 9, 8 and 4 samples, respectively. We found a high frequency of self-reported OD in COVID-19 patients, with 32.8% and 42.2% reporting current and recent OD, respectively. Different SDOIT models revealed smell impairment in 54.7-64.1% of COVID-19 patients. The combination of either 10-SDOIT results and self-reported OD, or 8-SDOIT results and self-reported OD, were the best predictors of COVID-19, both with an AUC value of 0.87 (0.85 and 0.86 for the age-matched subjects). OD is a common symptom of COVID-19. A combination of self-reported smell deterioration and OD psychophysically evaluated using SDOIT appears to be a good predictor of COVID-19.

摘要

嗅觉功能障碍(OD)是 COVID-19 的常见表现,可用于筛查。基于调查的嗅觉评估往往低估了 OD 的患病率,而大流行期间的心理物理学嗅觉测试则耗时、昂贵且需要标准化的实验室设置。我们旨在开发一种快速、简单、经济实惠且可靠的测试方法,以客观评估 COVID-19 中 OD 的患病率和诊断准确性。使用问卷和专为这项研究开发的简单一次性气味识别测试(SDOIT)评估了 64 名 COVID-19 住院患者和 34 名对照者的嗅觉功能。评估了四种 SDOIT 模型:10-SDOIT、9-SDOIT、8-SDOIT 和 4-SDOIT,分别有 10、9、8 和 4 个样本。我们发现 COVID-19 患者自我报告 OD 的频率很高,分别有 32.8%和 42.2%的患者报告当前和近期 OD。不同的 SDOIT 模型显示 COVID-19 患者的嗅觉障碍发生率为 54.7-64.1%。10-SDOIT 结果和自我报告 OD 的组合,或 8-SDOIT 结果和自我报告 OD 的组合,是 COVID-19 的最佳预测因子,两者的 AUC 值均为 0.87(年龄匹配受试者的 AUC 值分别为 0.85 和 0.86)。OD 是 COVID-19 的常见症状。自我报告的嗅觉恶化和 SDOIT 评估的 OD 相结合,似乎是 COVID-19 的良好预测因子。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/8507979/a0eaf8fbb4bc/ijerph-18-10185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/8507979/d5838431e66b/ijerph-18-10185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/8507979/a0eaf8fbb4bc/ijerph-18-10185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/8507979/d5838431e66b/ijerph-18-10185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/8507979/a0eaf8fbb4bc/ijerph-18-10185-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Simple Disposable Odor Identification Tests for Predicting SARS-CoV-2 Positivity.简单的一次性气味识别测试可预测 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(19):10185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910185.
2
Olfactory-related Quality of Life Adjustments in Smell Loss during the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间嗅觉丧失相关的生活质量调整。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Mar;36(2):253-260. doi: 10.1177/19458924211053118. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
3
Olfactory Dysfunction and Sinonasal Symptomatology in COVID-19: Prevalence, Severity, Timing, and Associated Characteristics.新冠病毒感染患者的嗅觉功能障碍和鼻-鼻窦症状:流行率、严重程度、出现时间和相关特征。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):114-120. doi: 10.1177/0194599820929185. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
Olfactory Dysfunction: A Highly Prevalent Symptom of COVID-19 With Public Health Significance.嗅觉功能障碍:具有公共卫生意义的 COVID-19 高度普遍症状
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):12-15. doi: 10.1177/0194599820926464. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8): Validation of a New Test in the Spanish Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic.8 气味剂巴塞罗那嗅觉测试(BOT-8):在 COVID-19 大流行期间对西班牙人群进行的新测试的验证。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;32(4):291-298. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0824. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Long-lasting olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.新冠病毒感染患者的持久嗅觉功能障碍。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;279(7):3485-3492. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07153-1. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Smell Status in Children Infected with SARS-CoV-2.儿童感染 SARS-CoV-2 后的嗅觉状态。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Aug;131(8):E2475-E2480. doi: 10.1002/lary.29403. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Objective evaluation of odor loss in COVID-19 and other suspected cases.新冠病毒(COVID-19)和其他疑似病例中嗅觉丧失的客观评估。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102761. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102761. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Development and Validation of a Novel At-home Smell Assessment.一种新型居家嗅觉评估方法的开发与验证
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Mar 1;148(3):252-258. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3994.
10
Six-Month Psychophysical Evaluation of Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with COVID-19.COVID-19 患者嗅觉功能障碍的六个月心理物理学评估。
Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab006.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2.在感染 SARS-CoV-2 的个体中,化学感觉缺陷是血清学反应的最佳预测指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 14;17(12):e0274611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274611. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Rated Smell Ability Enables Highly Specific Predictors of COVID-19 Status: A Case-Control Study in Israel.自我评估嗅觉能力可实现对新冠病毒感染状态的高度特异性预测:以色列的一项病例对照研究。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 28;8(2):ofaa589. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa589. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Objective Sensory Testing Methods Reveal a Higher Prevalence of Olfactory Loss in COVID-19-Positive Patients Compared to Subjective Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.目的:与主观方法相比,客观感觉测试方法显示 COVID-19 阳性患者的嗅觉丧失发生率更高:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):865-874. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa064.
3
Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Meta-analysis of 27,492 Patients.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)嗅觉功能障碍的患病率:对27492例患者的荟萃分析
Laryngoscope. 2021 Apr;131(4):865-878. doi: 10.1002/lary.29286. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
4
Loss of smell in COVID-19 patients: a critical review with emphasis on the use of olfactory tests.新冠病毒感染患者的嗅觉丧失:一项重点关注嗅觉测试应用的批判性综述
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Aug;40(4):241-247. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0862.
5
Frequency and Clinical Utility of Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新冠病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍的频率和临床实用性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020 Oct 13;20(12):76. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-00972-y.
6
Prevalence of Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Reveals Significant Ethnic Differences.新冠病毒患者嗅觉和味觉功能障碍的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析显示出显著的种族差异。
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;11(19):2944-2961. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00460. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Comparison of COVID-19 and common cold chemosensory dysfunction.新冠病毒与普通感冒的嗅觉味觉障碍比较。
Rhinology. 2020 Dec 1;58(6):623-625. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.251.
8
Psychophysical evaluation of chemosensory functions 5 weeks after olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a prospective cohort study on 72 patients.新冠病毒嗅觉丧失 5 周后的化学感觉功能的心理物理学评估:一项针对 72 例患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jan;278(1):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06267-2. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
Neurological and Musculoskeletal Features of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型冠状病毒肺炎的神经和肌肉骨骼特征:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2020 Jun 26;11:687. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00687. eCollection 2020.
10
Ethyl alcohol threshold test: a fast, reliable and affordable olfactory Assessment tool for COVID-19 patients.乙醇阈值测试:一种用于新冠患者的快速、可靠且经济实惠的嗅觉评估工具。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;277(10):2783-2792. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06131-3. Epub 2020 Jun 24.