• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人口对专业姑息治疗服务的潜在可及性:三个欧洲国家的比较研究。

Population's Potential Accessibility to Specialized Palliative Care Services: A Comparative Study in Three European Countries.

机构信息

ATLANTES Research Group, Institute for Culture and Society, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.

Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Recinto de Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra C/Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910345.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph181910345
PMID:34639645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8507925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care is a priority for health systems worldwide, yet equity in access remains unknown. To shed light on this issue, this study compares populations' driving time to specialized palliative care services in three countries: Ireland, Spain, and Switzerland.

METHODS

Network analysis of the population's driving time to services according to geolocated palliative care services using Geographical Information System (GIS). Percentage of the population living within a 30-min driving time, between 30 and 60 minutes, and over 60 min were calculated.

RESULTS

The percentage of the population living less than thirty minutes away from the nearest palliative care provider varies among Ireland (84%), Spain (79%), and Switzerland (95%). Percentages of the population over an hour away from services were 1.87% in Spain, 0.58% in Ireland, and 0.51% in Switzerland.

CONCLUSION

Inequities in access to specialized palliative care are noticeable amongst countries, with implications also at the sub-national level.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗是全球卫生系统的重点,但获得服务的公平性仍不清楚。为了阐明这个问题,本研究比较了爱尔兰、西班牙和瑞士三个国家的人群到专门的姑息治疗服务的驾车时间。

方法

使用地理信息系统(GIS)根据地理位置定位的姑息治疗服务,对人群到达服务的驾车时间进行网络分析。计算了居住在 30 分钟车程内、30-60 分钟车程内和超过 60 分钟车程内的人口比例。

结果

距离最近的姑息治疗提供者不到 30 分钟车程的人口比例在爱尔兰为 84%,西班牙为 79%,瑞士为 95%。距离服务超过一小时的人口比例在西班牙为 1.87%,爱尔兰为 0.58%,瑞士为 0.51%。

结论

国家之间在获得专门姑息治疗服务方面存在明显的不公平现象,在国家以下层面也存在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d99b/8507925/0a16ebbcbfdd/ijerph-18-10345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d99b/8507925/8e5e0dddb357/ijerph-18-10345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d99b/8507925/0a16ebbcbfdd/ijerph-18-10345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d99b/8507925/8e5e0dddb357/ijerph-18-10345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d99b/8507925/0a16ebbcbfdd/ijerph-18-10345-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Population's Potential Accessibility to Specialized Palliative Care Services: A Comparative Study in Three European Countries.人口对专业姑息治疗服务的潜在可及性:三个欧洲国家的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910345.
2
A method to determine spatial access to specialized palliative care services using GIS.一种使用地理信息系统(GIS)确定获得专科姑息治疗服务空间可达性的方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun 30;8:140. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-140.
3
Trends analysis of specialized palliative care services in 51 countries of the WHO European region in the last 14 years.过去 14 年里,世卫组织欧洲区域 51 个国家的专门姑息治疗服务趋势分析。
Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;34(8):1044-1056. doi: 10.1177/0269216320931341. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
Measuring geographical accessibility to palliative and end of life (PEoLC) related facilities: a comparative study in an area with well-developed specialist palliative care (SPC) provision.衡量姑息治疗和临终关怀(PEoLC)相关设施的地理可达性:在专科姑息治疗(SPC)服务发达地区的一项比较研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jan 26;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0185-0.
5
Migrants' access to healthcare services within the European Union: a content analysis of policy documents in Ireland, Portugal and Spain.欧盟内部移民获得医疗保健服务的情况:对爱尔兰、葡萄牙和西班牙政策文件的内容分析。
Global Health. 2018 Jun 15;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0373-6.
6
Coverage and development of specialist palliative care services across the World Health Organization European Region (2005-2012): Results from a European Association for Palliative Care Task Force survey of 53 Countries.世界卫生组织欧洲区域专业姑息治疗服务的覆盖范围与发展情况(2005 - 2012年):欧洲姑息治疗协会特别工作组对53个国家的调查结果
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):351-62. doi: 10.1177/0269216315598671. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
7
Funding models in palliative care: Lessons from international experience.姑息治疗的资金模式:国际经验教训
Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;31(4):296-305. doi: 10.1177/0269216316689015. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
8
Exploring geographical variation in access to general surgery in Ireland: Evidence from a national study.探索爱尔兰普通外科手术可及性的地域差异:来自一项全国性研究的证据。
Surgeon. 2019 Jun;17(3):139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
9
Mapping Pediatric Palliative Care Development in the WHO-European Region: Children Living in Low-to-Middle-Income Countries Are Less Likely to Access It.绘制世卫组织欧洲区域儿科舒缓治疗发展情况图:中低收入国家的儿童获得舒缓治疗的可能性较低。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Oct;60(4):746-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.028. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Accessibility to specialist palliative care services in Germany: a geographical network analysis.德国专科姑息治疗服务的可及性:地理网络分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09751-7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Spatial access to palliative care units in Germany: integrated analysis of availability and accessibility using the E2SFCA method].[德国姑息治疗病房的空间可达性:使用E2SFCA方法对可及性和可达性进行综合分析]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04124-3.
2
Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review.公平获得姑息治疗的机会:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Nov 25;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02321-1.
3
General practitioners and palliative care practices: a better knowledge of specific services is still needed.

本文引用的文献

1
National optimisation of accessibility to emergency obstetrical and neonatal care in Togo: a geospatial analysis.多哥国家优化紧急产科和新生儿护理的可及性:一项地理空间分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):e045891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045891.
2
Defining service catchment areas in low-resource settings.在资源匮乏地区界定服务覆盖范围。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006381.
3
Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Healthcare in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in Chicago Region.地理信息系统环境下医疗保健空间可达性的度量:综述与芝加哥地区的案例研究
全科医生与姑息治疗实践:仍需更深入了解特定服务。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11266-8.
4
Accessibility to specialist palliative care services in Germany: a geographical network analysis.德国专科姑息治疗服务的可及性:地理网络分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09751-7.
5
A Comparison of Hospice Care Utilization Between Rural and Urban Children in Appalachia: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis.阿巴拉契亚地区农村和城市儿童的临终关怀利用比较:地理信息系统分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Mar;41(3):288-294. doi: 10.1177/10499091231173415. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Geographic Information Systems Utilization in Pediatric End-of-Life Research: A Scoping Review.地理信息系统在儿科生命终末期研究中的应用:范围综述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Feb;41(2):216-227. doi: 10.1177/10499091231165276. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2003 Dec;30(6):865-884. doi: 10.1068/b29120.
4
Rapidly measuring spatial accessibility of COVID-19 healthcare resources: a case study of Illinois, USA.快速衡量 COVID-19 医疗资源的空间可达性:以美国伊利诺伊州为例。
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Sep 14;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00229-x.
5
Regional variations in geographic access to inpatient hospices and Place of death: A Population-based study in England, UK.区域差异对住院临终关怀和死亡地点的地理可达性:英国基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231666. eCollection 2020.
6
Proposing standardised geographical indicators of physical access to emergency obstetric and newborn care in low-income and middle-income countries.提出低收入和中等收入国家获得产科急诊和新生儿护理实际可及性的标准化地理指标。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 1;4(Suppl 5):e000778. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000778. eCollection 2019.
7
The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions.全球严重健康相关痛苦负担不断加剧:按世界区域、年龄组和健康状况预测到 2060 年的情况。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e883-e892. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30172-X. Epub 2019 May 22.
8
Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK.城乡间获得临终关怀和生命终末期(PEoLC)机构和死亡地点的地理可达性的差异:英国英格兰全国性基于人群的研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 May 6;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1.
9
System-Level Factors Associated With Use of Outpatient Specialty Palliative Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.与晚期癌症患者使用门诊专科姑息治疗相关的系统水平因素。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):e10-e19. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00234. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Hospitals, clinics, and palliative care units: Place-based experiences of formal healthcare settings by people experiencing structural vulnerability at the end-of-life.医院、诊所和姑息治疗单位:处于生命末期的结构性脆弱人群在正规医疗机构中的基于场所的体验。
Health Place. 2018 Sep;53:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 25.