• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加载角度和种植体长度对牙种植体静态和疲劳骨折的影响。

Effect of Loading Angles and Implant Lengths on the Static and Fatigue Fractures of Dental Implants.

作者信息

Sun Fei, Lv Li-Tao, Cheng Wei, Zhang Jia-Le, Ba De-Chun, Song Gui-Qiu, Lin Zeng

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Implant Device and Interface Science of Liaoning Province, School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;14(19):5542. doi: 10.3390/ma14195542.

DOI:10.3390/ma14195542
PMID:34639935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8509834/
Abstract

Mechanical properties play a key role in the failure of dental implants. Dental implants require fatigue life testing before clinical application, but this process takes a lot of time. This study investigated the effect of various loading angles and implant lengths on the static fracture and fatigue life of dental implants. Implants with lengths of 9 mm and 11 mm were prepared. Static fracture tests and dynamic fatigue life tests were performed under three loading angles (30°, 40°, and 50°), and the level arm and bending moment were measured. After that, the fracture morphology and fracture mode of the implant were observed. The results showed that 9 mm length implants have a higher static failure load and can withstand greater bending moments, while 11 mm length implants have a longer fatigue life. In addition, as the loading angle increases, the static strength and bending moment decrease linearly, and the fatigue life shows an exponential decrease at a rate of three times. Increasing the loading angle reduces the time of the implant fatigue test, which may be an effective method to improve the efficiency of the experiment.

摘要

力学性能在牙种植体失效中起关键作用。牙种植体在临床应用前需要进行疲劳寿命测试,但这个过程耗时较长。本研究调查了不同加载角度和种植体长度对牙种植体静态断裂和疲劳寿命的影响。制备了长度为9毫米和11毫米的种植体。在三个加载角度(30°、40°和50°)下进行静态断裂试验和动态疲劳寿命试验,并测量了力臂和弯矩。之后,观察种植体的断裂形态和断裂模式。结果表明,9毫米长的种植体具有更高的静态失效载荷,能够承受更大的弯矩,而11毫米长的种植体具有更长的疲劳寿命。此外,随着加载角度的增加,静态强度和弯矩呈线性下降,疲劳寿命以三倍的速率呈指数下降。增加加载角度可缩短种植体疲劳测试时间,这可能是提高实验效率的有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/f3fd2e6bc672/materials-14-05542-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/167d65ca336c/materials-14-05542-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/f096357bc218/materials-14-05542-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/ca3b7cdaf451/materials-14-05542-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/89a7d3e7828e/materials-14-05542-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/f9b2d8ffef11/materials-14-05542-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/e94ee301b296/materials-14-05542-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/11795d16057d/materials-14-05542-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/4e4dccd0e93a/materials-14-05542-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/0324cdc0276b/materials-14-05542-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/f3fd2e6bc672/materials-14-05542-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/167d65ca336c/materials-14-05542-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/f096357bc218/materials-14-05542-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/ca3b7cdaf451/materials-14-05542-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/89a7d3e7828e/materials-14-05542-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/f9b2d8ffef11/materials-14-05542-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/e94ee301b296/materials-14-05542-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/11795d16057d/materials-14-05542-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/4e4dccd0e93a/materials-14-05542-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/0324cdc0276b/materials-14-05542-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295f/8509834/f3fd2e6bc672/materials-14-05542-g010a.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Loading Angles and Implant Lengths on the Static and Fatigue Fractures of Dental Implants.加载角度和种植体长度对牙种植体静态和疲劳骨折的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;14(19):5542. doi: 10.3390/ma14195542.
2
Implant fracture under dynamic fatigue loading: influence of embedded angle and depth of implant.动态疲劳载荷下种植体的断裂:种植体埋入角度和深度的影响。
Odontology. 2016 Sep;104(3):357-62. doi: 10.1007/s10266-015-0228-z. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
3
Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.疲劳测试后种植体基台的断裂强度:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
4
Fatigue properties of plasma nitriding for dental implant application.用于牙科植入应用的等离子体氮化的疲劳性能
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Feb;131(2):329.e1-329.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
On the fatigue life of dental implants: Numerical and experimental investigation on configuration effect.牙科植入物的疲劳寿命:关于构型效应的数值和实验研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2024 Jan;123:104078. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104078. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.老化后支持全瓷冠的氧化锆和钛种植体基台的弯矩
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
7
Effect of Abutment Preparation and Fatigue Loading in a Moist Environment on the Fracture Resistance of the One-Piece Zirconia Dental Implant.基台预备及在潮湿环境中疲劳加载对一体式氧化锆牙种植体抗折性的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):533-540. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5077.
8
Different Conical Angle Connection of Implant and Abutment Behavior: A Static and Dynamic Load Test and Finite Element Analysis Study.种植体与基台不同锥角连接的行为:静态和动态载荷测试及有限元分析研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;16(5):1988. doi: 10.3390/ma16051988.
9
Fatigue resistance and fracture strength of narrow-diameter one-piece zirconia implants with angled abutments.带角度基台的窄径一体式氧化锆种植体的疲劳抗力和断裂强度。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Oct;34(7):1060-1067. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12944. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
10
Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments.薄壁氧化锆基台的机械测试。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):20-4. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302124.

引用本文的文献

1
SMURF1 Affects Dental Implant Integration in Diabetes By Regulating PKG2 Expression.SMURF1通过调节PKG2表达影响糖尿病患者的牙种植体整合。
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1007/s12010-025-05326-w.
2
Evaluation of Loading Stresses on Multiunit Abutments in Short Implants - An Study.短种植体上多单位基牙加载应力的评估——一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1832-S1835. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1946_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Assessment of the Impact of Bone Quality and Abutment Configuration on the Fatigue Performance of Dental Implant Systems Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of surface modifications of a nanostructured implant on osseointegration capacity - preliminary study.纳米结构植入物表面改性对骨整合能力的影响——初步研究
RSC Adv. 2018 Apr 24;8(28):15533-15546. doi: 10.1039/c8ra01625a. eCollection 2018 Apr 23.
2
The influence of prosthetic crown height and implant-abutment connection design selection on the long-term implant-abutment stability: A laboratory study.全冠高度和种植体-基台连接设计选择对种植体-基台长期稳定性的影响:一项实验室研究。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jan;113:104095. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104095. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
Mechanical Assessment of Fatigue Characteristics between Single- and Multi-Directional Cyclic Loading Modes on a Dental Implant System.
使用有限元分析(FEA)评估骨质量和基台配置对牙种植体系统疲劳性能的影响。
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 28;14(10):1040. doi: 10.3390/jpm14101040.
4
Influence of Framework Material and Abutment Configuration on Fatigue Performance in Dental Implant Systems: A Finite Element Analysis.基台形态和连接体设计对牙种植系统疲劳性能的影响:有限元分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 6;60(9):1463. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091463.
5
An In Vitro Investigation of the Role of Implant Abutment Materials on the Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Implant-Supported Restorations.种植体基台材料对种植体支持修复体抗折性和失效模式影响的体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Feb 21;16(2):e54624. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54624. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Mechanical and Biological Properties of Titanium and Its Alloys for Oral Implant with Preparation Techniques: A Review.用于口腔种植体的钛及其合金的机械和生物学性能与制备技术综述
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 25;16(21):6860. doi: 10.3390/ma16216860.
7
Effects of abutment screw preload and preload simulation techniques on dental implant lifetime.基台螺丝预紧力及预紧力模拟技术对牙种植体寿命的影响
JADA Found Sci. 2022;1. doi: 10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100010. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?迷你牙种植体的长度会影响其对过载导致失败的抵抗力吗?
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jul 1;10(7):117. doi: 10.3390/dj10070117.
牙科种植系统上单方向与多方向循环加载模式下疲劳特性的力学评估
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 27;13(7):1545. doi: 10.3390/ma13071545.
4
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials.聚焦种植体设计与材料的超短种植体三维有限元分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jan 29;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0202-6.
5
Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Oral Implants In Vitro: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氧化锆口腔种植体的体外抗折性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 24;13(3):562. doi: 10.3390/ma13030562.
6
Survival rates and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: An up to 5-year retrospective study.种植固定全口义齿的存活率和修复体并发症:一项长达 5 年的回顾性研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov;124(5):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.022. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Mechanism of and factors associated with the loosening of the implant abutment screw: A review.种植体基台螺钉松动的机制及相关因素:综述。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jul;31(4):338-345. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12494. Epub 2019 May 31.
8
Mechanical fatigue behaviour of different lengths screw-retained restorations connected to two designs prosthetic connection level.不同长度螺钉固位修复体与两种设计的修复体连接水平的机械疲劳行为。
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Aug;46(8):747-755. doi: 10.1111/joor.12809. Epub 2019 May 12.
9
Mechanical analysis of a dental implant system under 3 contact conditions and with 2 mechanical factors.在三种接触条件和两种力学因素下的牙种植体系统的力学分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Oct;122(4):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
10
Mechanical performance of conical implant-abutment connections under different cyclic loading conditions.不同循环加载条件下锥形种植体-基台连接的机械性能。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Feb;90:426-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.039. Epub 2018 Nov 1.