Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2022 Feb;35(1):269-277. doi: 10.1002/jts.22734. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
Despite calls forincreased mental health programming in low-resource and humanitarian contexts and effectiveness trials of psychotherapy in these settings, little research exists on the extent to which providers and recipients continue to practice skills learned during trials of these programs. To understand if and how providers continued to use mental health intervention skills without ongoing institutional support following the completion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we analyzed data from semistructured interviews with six of seven providers who participated in an RCT of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in the Democratic Republic of Congo 7 years prior. Provider interviews revealed continued knowledge of and, in some cases, the practice of core CPT skills as well as efforts to keep meeting with women in the community and a strong desire to learn new skills. Although financial limitations sometimes prohibited providers from formally convening CPT groups with women in need, participants maintained knowledge and skill use. Providers also reported feeling more valued in their communities, and they continued providing services beyond the planned intervention period despite a lack of ongoing support. In addition, participants described a strong desire to continue psychosocial interventions for trauma and learn more about this type of intervention. Reframing the evaluation of psychological interventions as program development and maintaining a strong working relationship with community partners may allow for increased sustainability of mental health services beyond the end of academic research studies in low-resource contexts.
尽管人们呼吁在资源匮乏和人道主义环境中增加心理健康项目,并在这些环境中对心理治疗进行有效性试验,但关于提供者和接受者在多大程度上继续实践这些项目试验中所学到的技能的研究甚少。为了了解提供者在随机对照试验 (RCT) 完成后没有持续的机构支持的情况下是否以及如何继续使用心理健康干预技能,我们分析了来自刚果民主共和国 7 年前参加认知加工治疗 (CPT) RCT 的七名提供者中的六名的半结构化访谈数据。提供者访谈显示,他们仍然了解并在某些情况下实践核心 CPT 技能,同时努力继续在社区中与妇女会面,并强烈希望学习新技能。尽管资金限制有时使提供者无法正式召集有需要的妇女参加 CPT 小组,但参与者仍保持了知识和技能的使用。提供者还报告说,他们在社区中感到更受重视,尽管缺乏持续的支持,但他们仍继续提供服务,超出了计划的干预期。此外,参与者表示强烈希望继续进行创伤的心理社会干预,并更多地了解这种类型的干预。将心理干预的评估重新定义为项目开发,并与社区合作伙伴保持强有力的工作关系,可能会使资源匮乏环境中的心理健康服务在学术研究结束后更具可持续性。