Universidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Carlos Institute of Physics, Department of Physics and Interdisciplinary Science, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Oct 11;35:e074. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0074. eCollection 2021.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) voxel size on dentinal microcrack detection after root canal preparation using rotary heat-treated nickel-titanium files. Curved mesial root canals (n = 24) of mandibular molars were prepared using ProDesign Logic 30/.05 (PDL) or HyFlex EDM 25/.08 (HEDM). The specimens were scanned by micro-CT at 5 μm voxel size before and after root canal preparation. The percentage of microcracks was evaluated in images at 5, 10 and 20 μm voxel size, by two examiners at two moments. The Kappa and McNemar tests (α = 0.05) were used. The percentage of dentinal microcracks was similar before and after PDL and HEDM preparations, at 10 and 20 μm (p > 0.05). HEDM showed a higher percentage of dentinal microcracks in the middle third at 5 μm after preparation (p < 0.05). The detection of dentinal microcracks before and after instrumentation using PDL was more accurate at 5 μm than at 20 μm, in all thirds (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this ex vivo study, as expected, the results showed that different resolutions influence the micro-CT analysis of microcracks. The highest accuracy in detecting microcracks was observed for analyses performed at 5 μm voxel size. HyFlex EDM caused even more microcracks to develop in the middle third, detectable only by visualization of images made at 5 μm voxel size.
本研究旨在评估微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)体素大小对使用热镍钛根管预备器械预备根管后牙本质微裂纹检测的影响。采用 ProDesign Logic 30/.05(PDL)或 HyFlex EDM 25/.08(HEDM)对下颌磨牙的近中弯曲根管进行预备。预备前后,标本分别以 5μm 体素大小进行 micro-CT 扫描。在 5、10 和 20μm 体素大小的图像中,由两位观察者在两个时间点评估微裂纹的百分比。采用 Kappa 和 McNemar 检验(α=0.05)。在 10 和 20μm 时,PDL 和 HEDM 预备前后牙本质微裂纹的百分比相似(p>0.05)。预备后,HEDM 在中三分之一处的牙本质微裂纹百分比在 5μm 时更高(p<0.05)。与 20μm 相比,在预备前后使用 PDL 仪器检测牙本质微裂纹时,5μm 的检测更准确,在所有三分之一处均如此(p<0.05)。在这项离体研究的限制内,结果如预期所示,不同的分辨率会影响微 CT 对微裂纹的分析。在检测微裂纹方面,观察到 5μm 体素大小的分析具有最高的准确性。HyFlex EDM 甚至在中三分之一处产生更多的微裂纹,仅在 5μm 体素大小的图像可视化时才能检测到。