INSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique CIC-P 1433, CHRU Nancy, INSERM U1116, FCRIN INI-CRCT, Lorraine Université, Nancy, France.
Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine (CNRGH), Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Oct 13;28(12):1334-1341. doi: 10.1177/2047487319890763. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
The association between resting heart rate (HR) and cardiovascular outcomes, especially heart failure, is now well established. However, whether HR is mainly an integrated marker of risk associated with other features, or rather a genetic origin risk marker, is still a matter for debate. Previous studies reported a heritability ranging from 14% to 65%.
We assessed HR heritability in the STANISLAS family-study, based on the data of four visits performed over a 20-year period, and adjusted for most known confounding effects.
These analyses were conducted using a linear mixed model, adjusted on age, sex, tea or coffee consumption, beta-blocker use, physical activity, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption to estimate the variance captured by additive genetic effects, via average information restricted maximum likelihood analysis, with both self-reported pedigree and genetic relatedness matrix (GRM) calculated from genome-wide association study data.
Based on the data of all visits, the HR heritability (h2) estimate was 23.2% with GRM and 24.5% with pedigree. However, we found a large heterogeneity of HR heritability estimations when restricting the analysis to each of the four visits (h2 from 19% to 39% using pedigree, and from 14% to 32% using GRM). Moreover, only a little part of variance was explained by the common household effect (<5%), and half of the variance remained unexplained.
Using a comprehensive analysis based on a family cohort, including the data of multiple visits and GRM, we found that HR variability is about 25% from genetic origin, 25% from repeated measures and 50% remains unexplained.
静息心率(HR)与心血管结局之间的关系,尤其是心力衰竭,现在已经得到充分证实。然而,HR 主要是与其他特征相关的风险综合标志物,还是遗传起源的风险标志物,仍存在争议。先前的研究报告遗传率在 14%到 65%之间。
我们基于跨越 20 年的四次访问数据,使用线性混合模型评估了 STANISLAS 家族研究中的 HR 遗传性,并针对大多数已知的混杂效应进行了调整。
这些分析使用线性混合模型进行,调整了年龄、性别、茶或咖啡的消耗、β-受体阻滞剂的使用、体育活动、吸烟和饮酒,通过平均信息限制最大似然分析来估计加性遗传效应所捕获的方差,同时使用自我报告的系谱和基于全基因组关联研究数据计算的遗传关系矩阵(GRM)。
基于所有访问的数据,HR 遗传率(h2)估计值分别为使用 GRM 时的 23.2%和使用系谱时的 24.5%。然而,当将分析仅限于四次访问中的每一次时,我们发现 HR 遗传率的估计存在很大的异质性(使用系谱时为 19%至 39%,使用 GRM 时为 14%至 32%)。此外,常见家庭效应只解释了一小部分方差(<5%),一半的方差仍然无法解释。
使用基于家族队列的综合分析,包括多次访问和 GRM 的数据,我们发现 HR 的变异性约有 25%来自遗传起源,25%来自重复测量,50%仍然无法解释。