College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Liaoning Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Shenyang, China.
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jan;28(1):154-166. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15930. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
No-till (NT) is a sustainable option because of its benefits in controlling erosion, saving labor, and mitigating climate change. However, a comprehensive assessment of soil pH response to NT is still lacking. Thus, a global meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effects of NT on soil pH and to identify the influential factors and possible consequences based on the analysis of 114 publications. When comparing tillage practices, the results indicated an overall significant decrease by 1.33 ± 0.28% in soil pH under NT than that under conventional tillage (p < .05). Soil texture, NT duration, mean annual temperature (MAT), and initial soil pH are the critical factors affecting soil pH under NT. Specifically, with significant variations among subgroups, when compared to conventional tillage, the soil under NT had lower relative changes in soil pH observed on clay loam soil (-2.44%), long-term implementation (-2.11% for more than 15 years), medium MAT (-1.87% in the range of 8-16℃), neutral soil pH (-2.28% for 6.5 < initial soil pH < 7.5), mean annual precipitation (-1.95% in the range of 600-1200 mm), in topsoil layers (-2.03% for 0-20 cm), with crop rotation (-1.98%), N fertilizer input (the same for NT and conventional tillage) of 100-200 kg N ha (-1.83%), or crop residue retention (-1.52%). Changes in organic matter decomposition under undisturbed soil and with crop residue retention might lead to a higher concentration of H and lower of basic cations (i.e., calcium, magnesium, and potassium), which decrease the soil pH, and consequently, impact nutrient dynamics (i.e., soil phosphorus) in the surface layer under NT. Furthermore, soil acidification may be aggravated by NT within site-specific conditions and improper fertilizer and crop residue management and consequently leading to adverse effects on soil nutrient availability. Thus, there is a need to identify strategies to ameliorate soil acidification under NT to minimize the adverse consequences.
免耕(NT)是一种可持续的选择,因为它在控制侵蚀、节省劳动力和缓解气候变化方面具有优势。然而,目前仍缺乏对土壤 pH 对 NT 响应的综合评估。因此,进行了一项全球荟萃分析,以确定 NT 对土壤 pH 的影响,并根据对 114 篇出版物的分析,确定影响因素和可能的后果。在比较耕作方式时,结果表明,与传统耕作相比,NT 下土壤 pH 总体显著下降 1.33±0.28%(p<0.05)。土壤质地、NT 持续时间、年平均温度(MAT)和初始土壤 pH 是影响 NT 下土壤 pH 的关键因素。具体而言,在子组之间存在显著差异的情况下,与传统耕作相比,在粘壤土(-2.44%)、长期实施(15 年以上为-2.11%)、中 MAT(8-16℃范围内为-1.87%)、中性土壤 pH(6.5<初始土壤 pH<7.5 时为-2.28%)、年平均降水量(600-1200mm 范围内为-1.95%)、表土层(0-20cm 范围内为-2.03%)、轮作(-1.98%)、氮肥投入(NT 和传统耕作相同为 100-200kgNha-1(-1.83%))或作物残茬保留(-1.52%)下,土壤 pH 值较低。在未受干扰的土壤下,有机物质分解的变化和作物残茬的保留可能导致 H 浓度升高,而基本阳离子(即钙、镁和钾)浓度降低,从而降低土壤 pH 值,进而影响 NT 下表层土壤中的养分动态(即土壤磷)。此外,在特定地点条件和不当的肥料和作物残茬管理下,NT 可能会加剧土壤酸化,并导致土壤养分供应的不利影响。因此,有必要确定在 NT 下改善土壤酸化的策略,以最大限度地减少不利后果。