Department of Mathematical Demography & Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Department of Population Policies and Programmes, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0258656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258656. eCollection 2021.
Despite the prohibition by the law in 1961, dowry is widely prevalent in India. Dowry stems from the early concept of 'Stridhana,' in which gifts were given to the bride by her family to secure some personal wealth for her when she married. However, with the transition of time, the practice of dowry is becoming more common, and the demand for a higher dowry becomes a burden to the bride's family. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the factors associated with the practice of dowry in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.
We utilized information from 5206 married adolescent girls from the Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) project survey conducted in two Indian states, namely, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Dowry was the outcome variable of this study. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the factors associated with dowry payment during the marriage.
The study reveals that dowry is still prevalent in the state of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Also, the proportion of dowry varies by adolescent's age at marriage, spousal education, and household socioeconomic status. The likelihood of paid dowry was 48 percent significantly less likely (OR: 0.52; CI: 0.44-0.61) among adolescents who knew their husbands before marriage compared to those who do not know their husbands before marriage. Adolescents with age at marriage more than equal to legal age had higher odds to pay dowry (OR: 1.60; CI: 1.14-2.14) than their counterparts. Adolescents with mother's who had ten and above years of education, the likelihood of dowry was 33 percent less likely (OR: 0.67; CI: 0.45-0.98) than their counterparts. Adolescents belonging to the richest households (OR: 1.48; CI: 1.13-1.93) were more likely to make dowry payments than adolescents belonging to poor households.
Limitation of the dowry prohibition act is one of the causes of continued practices of dowry, but major causes are deeply rooted in the social and cultural customs, which cannot be changed only using laws. Our study suggests that only the socio-economic development of women will not protect her from the dowry system, however higher dowry payment is more likely among women from better socio-economic class.
尽管 1961 年的法律禁止,但嫁妆在印度仍然普遍存在。嫁妆源于早期的“Stridhana”概念,即女方家庭在女儿出嫁时给予她一些个人财富作为礼物。然而,随着时间的推移,嫁妆的习俗变得越来越普遍,对更高嫁妆的需求成为新娘家庭的负担。因此,本研究旨在确定比哈尔邦和北方邦嫁妆习俗的相关因素。
我们利用了来自印度两个邦(北方邦和比哈尔邦)的“理解青少年和年轻人生活(UDAYA)”项目调查中 5206 名已婚青少年的信息。嫁妆是本研究的因变量。我们进行了单变量、双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以探讨与婚姻期间支付嫁妆有关的因素。
研究表明,嫁妆在北方邦和比哈尔邦仍然很普遍。此外,嫁妆的比例因青少年的结婚年龄、配偶的教育程度和家庭的社会经济地位而有所不同。与不认识丈夫的青少年相比,在结婚前就认识丈夫的青少年支付嫁妆的可能性显著降低了 48%(OR:0.52;95%CI:0.44-0.61)。结婚年龄大于等于法定年龄的青少年支付嫁妆的可能性更高(OR:1.60;95%CI:1.14-2.14)。母亲受教育程度在 10 年以上的青少年支付嫁妆的可能性降低了 33%(OR:0.67;95%CI:0.45-0.98)。来自最富裕家庭的青少年(OR:1.48;95%CI:1.13-1.93)比来自贫困家庭的青少年更有可能支付嫁妆。
限制嫁妆禁止法的实施是嫁妆习俗持续存在的原因之一,但主要原因是嫁妆习俗深深植根于社会和文化习俗,仅通过法律无法改变。我们的研究表明,仅通过提高妇女的社会经济地位并不能使她免受嫁妆制度的影响,然而,来自更好社会经济阶层的女性支付的嫁妆更高。