Hachen I, Reinartz S, Brasselet R, Stroligo A, Diamond M E
Tactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), 34136, Trieste, Italy.
Brain & Sound Lab, Department of Biomedicine, Basel University, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 15;12(1):6036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26104-2.
Identical physical inputs do not always evoke identical percepts. To investigate the role of stimulus history in tactile perception, we designed a task in which rats had to judge each vibrissal vibration, in a long series, as strong or weak depending on its mean speed. After a low-speed stimulus (trial n - 1), rats were more likely to report the next stimulus (trial n) as strong, and after a high-speed stimulus, they were more likely to report the next stimulus as weak, a repulsive effect that did not depend on choice or reward on trial n - 1. This effect could be tracked over several preceding trials (i.e., n - 2 and earlier) and was characterized by an exponential decay function, reflecting a trial-by-trial incorporation of sensory history. Surprisingly, the influence of trial n - 1 strengthened as the time interval between n - 1 and n grew. Human subjects receiving fingertip vibrations showed these same key findings. We are able to account for the repulsive stimulus history effect, and its detailed time scale, through a single-parameter model, wherein each new stimulus gradually updates the subject's decision criterion. This model points to mechanisms underlying how the past affects the ongoing subjective experience.
相同的物理输入并不总是引发相同的感知。为了研究刺激历史在触觉感知中的作用,我们设计了一项任务,让大鼠根据一系列长时程的触须振动的平均速度来判断其强度是强还是弱。在经历低速刺激(第n - 1次试验)后,大鼠更有可能将下一次刺激(第n次试验)报告为强;而在经历高速刺激后,它们更有可能将下一次刺激报告为弱,这种排斥效应并不取决于第n - 1次试验中的选择或奖励。这种效应可以在之前的几次试验(即n - 2及更早的试验)中追踪到,并且其特征是呈指数衰减函数,反映了逐次试验对感觉历史的整合。令人惊讶的是,随着第n - 1次试验和第n次试验之间的时间间隔增加,第n - 1次试验的影响会增强。接受指尖振动的人类受试者也表现出了这些相同的关键发现。我们能够通过一个单参数模型来解释排斥性刺激历史效应及其详细的时间尺度,在该模型中,每个新刺激都会逐渐更新受试者的决策标准。这个模型指出了过去如何影响当前主观体验的潜在机制。