Suppr超能文献

各种漱口配方和盐水对 SARS-CoV-2 的有效性。

The effectiveness of various gargle formulations and salt water against SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Persiaran Ilmu, Bandar Baru Nilai, 78000, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 15;11(1):20502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99866-w.

Abstract

The COVID-19 is difficult to contain due to its high transmissibility rate and a long incubation period of 5 to 14 days. Moreover, more than half of the infected patients were young and asymptomatic. Virus transmission through asymptomatic patients is a major challenge to disease containment. Due to limited treatment options, preventive measures play major role in controlling the disease spread. Gargling with antiseptic formulation may have potential role in eliminating the virus in the throat. Four commercially available mouthwash/gargle formulations were tested for virucidal activity against SARS-CoV-2 in both clean (0.3 g/l BSA) and dirty (0.3 g/l BSA + 3 mL/L human erythrocytes) conditions at time points 30 and 60 s. The virus was isolated and propagated in Vero E6 cells. The cytotoxicity of the products to the Vero E6 was evaluated by kill time assay based on the European Standard EN14476:2013/FprA1:2015 protocol. Virus titres were calculated as 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50/mL) using the Spearman-Karber method. A reduction in virus titer of 4 log corresponds to an inactivation of ≥ 99.99%. Formulations with cetylperidinium chloride, chlorhexidine and hexitidine achieved > 4 log10 reduction in viral titres when exposed within 30 s under both clean and dirty conditions. Thymol formulations achieved only 0.5 log reduction in viral titres. In addition, salt water was not proven effective. Gargle formulations with cetylperidinium chloride, chlorhexidine and hexetidine have great potential in reducing SAR-CoV-2 at the source of entry into the body, thus minimizing risk of transmission of COVID-19.

摘要

由于其高传染性和 5 至 14 天的长潜伏期,COVID-19 难以控制。此外,超过一半的感染患者是年轻人且无症状。无症状患者的病毒传播是疾病控制的主要挑战。由于治疗选择有限,预防措施在控制疾病传播方面发挥着重要作用。用消毒剂漱口可能具有消除喉咙中病毒的潜力。在清洁(0.3 g/l BSA)和脏污(0.3 g/l BSA + 3 mL/L 人红细胞)条件下,在 30 和 60 s 时,对四种市售的漱口/漱口配方针对 SARS-CoV-2 的杀病毒活性进行了测试。在 Vero E6 细胞中分离和繁殖病毒。根据欧洲标准 EN14476:2013/FprA1:2015 协议,通过基于杀伤时间测定法评估产品对 Vero E6 的细胞毒性。使用 Spearman-Karber 方法计算病毒滴度为 50%组织培养感染剂量(TCID50/mL)。病毒滴度降低 4 个对数级对应于灭活率≥99.99%。在清洁和脏污条件下,在 30 s 内暴露时,含十六烷基吡啶氯、洗必泰和己定的配方可使病毒滴度降低>4 log10。百里酚配方仅使病毒滴度降低 0.5 log。此外,盐水证明无效。含十六烷基吡啶氯、洗必泰和己定的漱口配方具有在进入体内的源头减少 SARS-CoV-2 的巨大潜力,从而最大限度地降低 COVID-19 传播的风险。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of various gargle formulations and salt water against SARS-CoV-2.
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 15;11(1):20502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99866-w.
3
Effective inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by commercially available mouthwashes.
J Gen Virol. 2021 Apr;102(4). doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001578.
4
Efficacy of a Mouthwash Containing CHX and CPC in SARS-CoV-2-Positive Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
J Dent Res. 2023 Jun;102(6):608-615. doi: 10.1177/00220345231156415. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
5
Efficacy of commercial mouth-rinses on SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva: randomized control trial in Singapore.
Infection. 2021 Apr;49(2):305-311. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01563-9. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Comparison of the in-vitro efficacy of different mouthwash solutions targeting SARS-CoV-2 based on the European Standard EN 14476.
J Hosp Infect. 2021 May;111:180-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.031. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
8
In Vitro Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Gargle/Mouthwash Against Respiratory and Oral Tract Pathogens.
Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Jun;7(2):249-259. doi: 10.1007/s40121-018-0200-7. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of Acute Sore Throat in Malaysia: A Consensus of Multidisciplinary Recommendations Using Modified Delphi Methodology.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Sep 24;17:4149-4160. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S477038. eCollection 2024.
2
Construction of an IFNAR1 knockout MDBK cell line using CRISPR/Cas9 and its effect on bovine virus replication.
Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 19;15:1404649. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1404649. eCollection 2024.
3
Efficacy of different mouthwashes against COVID-19: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2023 Dec;59:334-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
Saline nasal irrigation and gargling in COVID-19: a multidisciplinary review of effects on viral load, mucosal dynamics, and patient outcomes.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;11:1161881. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1161881. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy of Mouth Rinses and Nasal Spray in the Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of and Studies.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 25;19(19):12148. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912148.
7
Disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2: A Review.
Viruses. 2022 Aug 4;14(8):1721. doi: 10.3390/v14081721.
9
Oral Antiseptics against SARS-CoV-2: A Literature Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(14):8768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148768.
10
Cetylpyridinium chloride promotes disaggregation of SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles.
J Oral Microbiol. 2022 Jan 24;14(1):2030094. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2022.2030094. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Use of chlorhexidine to eradicate oropharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients.
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4370-4373. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26954. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Clinical characteristics and risk factors for severe COVID-19 infections in Malaysia: A nationwide observational study.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Nov;4:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100055. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Coronavirus pandemic: is HO mouthwash going to overcome the chlorhexidine in dental practices?
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;122(5):527-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
6
Movement control as an effective measure against Covid-19 spread in Malaysia: an overview.
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(3):583-586. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01316-w. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
7
Virucidal Efficacy of Different Oral Rinses Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.
J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 14;222(8):1289-1292. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa471.
8
Is povidone iodine mouthwash effective against SARS-CoV-2? First in vivo tests.
Oral Dis. 2022 Apr;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):908-911. doi: 10.1111/odi.13526. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Povidone iodine gargle and mouthwash.
Br Dent J. 2020 Jun;228(12):900. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-1794-1.
10
Is the oral cavity relevant in SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Aug;24(8):2925-2930. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03413-2. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验