• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

频率、主题和偏好:追踪学生在一门一年级课程中与多种师生互动模式的参与情况。

Frequency, topic, and preferences: Tracking student engagement with several modalities of student-instructor contact in a first-year course.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.

Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.

出版信息

FEBS Open Bio. 2022 Jan;12(1):12-23. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13315. Epub 2021 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1002/2211-5463.13315
PMID:34656071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8727952/
Abstract

Meaningful student-instructor interactions during an undergraduate degree course can have important effects on student learning. The format by which those interactions are made possible can vary greatly. We investigated the preferred modality of contact and students' reasons for contact across several modalities in a first-year biology course. We tracked student-instructor contact for two-course instructors who team teach collaboratively (rather than sequentially) across two-course sections. Both instructors had identical scores on student evaluations of approachability. Student-instructor contact was facilitated using five 'student hour' modalities: (a) in office by appointment, (b) 1 h per week, in office drop in, (c) 1 h per week, virtual chat, (d) by email, (e) 10 min immediately after class. Though email was the preferred method of contact, the period immediately following the class instruction was the most popular of the face-to-face options. We note significant differences in the distribution of workload across the two instructors and make recommendations for increasing the accessibility of student-instructor contact and for equity in workload to support student learning.

摘要

在本科课程中,有意义的师生互动对学生的学习会产生重要影响。这些互动的形式可以有很大的不同。我们在一门生物学入门课程中,调查了学生在多种联系方式中偏好的联系方式以及他们选择这种联系方式的原因。我们对两位共同教授两门课程(而不是顺序教授)的教师进行了跟踪,以了解学生与教师的接触情况。两位教师在学生对可接近性的评价中得分相同。通过五种“学生小时”模式促进师生互动:(a)预约在办公室,(b)每周 1 小时,在办公室随时来访,(c)每周 1 小时,虚拟聊天,(d)通过电子邮件,(e)课后立即 10 分钟。虽然电子邮件是首选的联系方式,但课程结束后立即与老师交流是最受欢迎的面对面交流方式之一。我们注意到两位教师之间的工作量分配存在显著差异,并提出了增加师生联系的可及性和公平分配工作量以支持学生学习的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/6e76ec77943c/FEB4-12-12-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/cc5ba85c9ede/FEB4-12-12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/d28eb9fee9fd/FEB4-12-12-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/969444d02578/FEB4-12-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/6e76ec77943c/FEB4-12-12-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/cc5ba85c9ede/FEB4-12-12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/d28eb9fee9fd/FEB4-12-12-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/969444d02578/FEB4-12-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db34/8727952/6e76ec77943c/FEB4-12-12-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency, topic, and preferences: Tracking student engagement with several modalities of student-instructor contact in a first-year course.频率、主题和偏好:追踪学生在一门一年级课程中与多种师生互动模式的参与情况。
FEBS Open Bio. 2022 Jan;12(1):12-23. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13315. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
2
Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference?学生对教师支持度的感知:哪些特征有影响?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar29. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-10-0238.
3
Students' Class Perceptions and Ratings of Instruction: Variability Across Undergraduate Mathematics Courses.学生对课程的认知与教学评分:本科数学课程的差异
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 10;12:576282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.576282. eCollection 2021.
4
Traditional Versus Online Biology Courses: Connecting Course Design and Student Learning in an Online Setting.传统生物学课程与在线生物学课程:在在线环境中连接课程设计与学生学习
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2016 Dec 2;17(3):417-422. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1157. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
"What's Your Thinking behind That?" Exploring Why Biology Instructors Use Classroom Discourse.“你这么做的背后是怎么想的?”探究生物教师运用课堂话语的原因。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Apr 20;24(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00132-22. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Am I getting through? Surveying students on what messages they recall from the first day of STEM classes.我说明白了吗?调查学生们对STEM课程第一天所传达信息的记忆情况。
Int J STEM Educ. 2021;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00306-y. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
7
What's in a Name? The Importance of Students Perceiving That an Instructor Knows Their Names in a High-Enrollment Biology Classroom.名字的意义:在一个高人数生物学课堂中,让学生感到教师了解他们的名字的重要性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0265.
8
An observation tool for instructor and student behaviors to measure in-class learner engagement: a validation study.一种用于测量课堂学习者参与度的教师和学生行为观察工具:一项验证研究。
Med Educ Online. 2014 Oct 10;19:24037. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.24037. eCollection 2014.
9
Access to Online Formative Assessments in Lower-Division Undergraduate Biology Courses: Investigating Barriers to Student Engagement.在线形成性评估在低年级本科生物学课程中的应用:调查学生参与的障碍。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar80. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-05-0098.
10
Exploring Variations in STEM Instructors' Approaches to Office Hours.探究 STEM 教师在办公时间辅导方式上的差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar52. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-03-0109.

本文引用的文献

1
Making a First Impression: Exploring What Instructors Do and Say on the First Day of Introductory STEM Courses.留下第一印象:探索导论性 STEM 课程第一天教师的所做所言。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Mar;20(1):ar7. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-05-0098.
2
Gendered styles of student-faculty interaction among college students.大学生中师生互动的性别化风格。
Soc Sci Res. 2018 Sep;75:117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 21.