• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生中师生互动的性别化风格。

Gendered styles of student-faculty interaction among college students.

作者信息

Cohen Emma D

机构信息

Indiana University, Department of Sociology, Ballantine Hall 744, 1020 E. Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2018 Sep;75:117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.06.004
PMID:30080484
Abstract

Scholars have examined gender differences in many areas of college life, but we know little about how men and women may interact differently with faculty-an activity with strong links to student outcomes. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement, I investigate whether men and women demonstrate different styles of interaction with faculty. I find that women are more likely than men to engage frequently in instrumental interactions, such as emailing and discussing course logistics with faculty. In contrast, men are more likely than women to have frequent higher order interactions, such as discussing ideas and participating in research. These findings introduce a new typology of student-faculty interaction and contribute to our understanding of gendered pathways through higher education.

摘要

学者们已经研究了大学生活许多领域中的性别差异,但我们对男性和女性与教师互动方式的差异却知之甚少,而这种互动与学生的学业成果有着紧密联系。利用来自全国学生参与度调查的数据,我研究了男性和女性与教师互动的方式是否存在差异。我发现,女性比男性更有可能频繁地进行工具性互动,比如给教师发电子邮件以及讨论课程安排。相比之下,男性比女性更有可能频繁地进行高阶互动,比如讨论观点和参与研究。这些发现引入了一种新的师生互动类型,并有助于我们理解高等教育中的性别差异路径。

相似文献

1
Gendered styles of student-faculty interaction among college students.大学生中师生互动的性别化风格。
Soc Sci Res. 2018 Sep;75:117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
The effects of undergraduate nursing student-faculty interaction outside the classroom on college grade point average.本科护生课堂外师生互动对大学平均绩点的影响。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2011 Sep;11(5):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
3
Student-faculty informal interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: a review of the literature.学生与教师的非正式互动及其对大学生学业成果的影响:文献综述
Adolescence. 1993 Winter;28(112):971-90.
4
'Professor Moms' & 'Hidden Service' in Pandemic Times: Students Report Women Faculty more Supportive & Accommodating amid U.S. COVID Crisis Onset.疫情时期的“妈妈教授”与“隐形服务”:学生报告称,在美国新冠疫情爆发初期,女教师更具支持性且更能提供便利。
Innov High Educ. 2023 Apr 24:1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10755-023-09652-x.
5
U.S. dental hygiene faculty perceptions of learner outcomes in distance education courses.美国口腔卫生教师对远程教育课程学习成果的看法。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Apr;78(4):530-40.
6
Improving faculty engagement in college health initiatives: Insights from current faculty with a college health background.提高教师对高校健康计划的参与度:具有高校健康背景的现任教师的见解。
J Am Coll Health. 2021 Apr;69(3):340-344. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1664553. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
"We Do Science Here": Underrepresented Students' Interactions with Faculty in Different College Contexts.“我们在这里做科研”:不同大学环境中代表性不足的学生与教师的互动
J Soc Issues. 2011 Sep;67(3):553-579. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01714.x.
8
My thoughts on teaching.我对教学的思考。
J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Fall;36(3):256-9. doi: 10.3138/jvme.36.3.256.
9
Gender issues in clinical dental education.临床牙科教育中的性别问题。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Mar;78(3):401-10.
10
Learning styles differ between senior dietetics students and dietetics faculty members.高级营养学专业学生和营养学教员的学习风格存在差异。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Oct;105(10):1605-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.07.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying Responsive Survey Design to Small-Scale Surveys: Campus Surveys of Sexual Misconduct.将响应式调查设计应用于小规模调查:校园性行为不端调查
Sociol Methods Res. 2023 Nov;52(4):1916-1946. doi: 10.1177/00491241211031270. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
2
The impact of college experience on female students' self-perceived employability in STEM majors.大学经历对理工科专业女生自我感知的就业能力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1282934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1282934. eCollection 2023.
3
College students still maintain the traditional Chinese concept of love.
大学生仍然秉持着中国传统的爱情观念。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 22;9(3):e13786. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13786. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
The impact of parenting styles on undergraduate students' emotion regulation: The mediating role of academic-social student-faculty interaction.教养方式对本科生情绪调节的影响:学术性社会师生互动的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 7;13:972006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972006. eCollection 2022.
5
Frequency, topic, and preferences: Tracking student engagement with several modalities of student-instructor contact in a first-year course.频率、主题和偏好:追踪学生在一门一年级课程中与多种师生互动模式的参与情况。
FEBS Open Bio. 2022 Jan;12(1):12-23. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13315. Epub 2021 Oct 31.