Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Ave FXB 401, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01343-5.
The external validity of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) refers to the extent to which the results of the RCT apply to the relevant, non-trial population and is impacted by its eligibility criteria, its organization, and its delivery of the intervention. Here, we compared the outcomes of mortality and hospitalization between an RCT and a cohort study that concurrently enrolled HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) newborns in Botswana.
The Mpepu Study (the RCT) was a clinical trial which determined that co-trimoxazole (CTX) provided no survival benefit for HEUs, allowing both arms of the RCT to be used. The Maikaelelo study (the cohort study) was a prospective observational study that enrolled HEU newborns with telephone follow-up and no in-person visits. Rates of death and hospitalization in the pooled population, were modeled using cox-proportional hazards models for time to death or time to first hospitalization, with study setting (RCT vs. cohort study) as an independent variable. The causal effect of study setting on morbidity and mortality was obtained through a treatment effects approach.
In total, 4,010 infants were included; 1,306 were enrolled into the cohort study and 2,704 were enrolled into the RCT. No significant differences in mortality were observed between the two study settings (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.76, 2.13), but RCT participants had a lower risk of hospitalization (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.89) that decreased with age. However, RCT participants had a higher risk of hospitalization within the first six months of life. The causal risk difference in hospitalizations attributable to the RCT setting was -0.03 (95% CI: -0.05, -0.01).
Children in an RCT with rigorous application of national standard of care guidelines experienced a significantly lower risk of hospitalization than children participating in a cohort study that did not alter clinical care. Future research is needed to further investigate outcome disparities when real-world results fail to mirror those achieved in a clinical trial. Trial registration The Mpepu Trial was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (No. NCT01229761) and the Maikaelelo Study was funded primarily by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (32AI007433-21).
随机对照试验(RCT)的外部有效性是指 RCT 结果在多大程度上适用于相关的非试验人群,受到其纳入标准、组织和干预措施的影响。在这里,我们比较了博茨瓦纳同时招募 HIV 暴露未感染(HEU)新生儿的 RCT 和队列研究的死亡率和住院率。
Mpepu 研究(RCT)是一项临床试验,该试验确定复方新诺明(CTX)对 HEU 没有生存益处,允许 RCT 的两个臂都被使用。Maikaelelo 研究(队列研究)是一项前瞻性观察性研究,对 HEU 新生儿进行电话随访,没有面对面访问。使用 Cox 比例风险模型对死亡或首次住院时间进行建模,以研究环境(RCT 与队列研究)为自变量,计算合并人群的死亡率和住院率。通过治疗效果方法获得研究环境对发病率和死亡率的因果影响。
共有 4010 名婴儿入组;1306 名入组队列研究,2704 名入组 RCT。两个研究环境之间的死亡率无显著差异(HR:1.28,95%CI:0.76,2.13),但 RCT 参与者的住院风险较低(HR:0.72,95%CI:0.58,0.89),且随年龄增长而降低。然而,RCT 参与者在生命的头六个月内住院的风险较高。由于 RCT 环境导致的住院率差异为-0.03(95%CI:-0.05,-0.01)。
在严格应用国家标准护理指南的 RCT 中,儿童的住院风险显著低于未改变临床护理的队列研究中的儿童。当现实世界的结果与临床试验结果不一致时,需要进一步研究结果差异。试验注册 Mpepu 试验由美国国立卫生研究院(NCT01229761)资助,Maikaelelo 研究主要由美国疾病控制与预防中心(32AI007433-21)资助。