Mishra Baijayantimala, Behera Bijayini, Singh Arvind K, Mohapatra Prasanta R, Patro Binod K, Panigrahi Manoj K, Pillai Jawahar S K, Barik Sadanand, Mahapatra Ashoka, Mohanty Srujana, Hallur Vinaykumar, Gupta Kavita, Batmanabane Gitanjali
Department of Microbiology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Aug;10(8):2974-2979. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2486_20. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
Healthcare workers (HCW) are the most vulnerable group for contracting SARS-CoV-2. Assessment of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among HCW, thus can provide important data on pathogen exposure, infectivity, and adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE). The present study aimed at assessing SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among HCW and exploring associations with demographics, category of exposure to COVID-19 patients, preventive measures taken and relation with COVID-19 symptoms.
HCWs with a minimum gap 2 weeks from last duty were eligible to participate in the study. The enrolled HCW were categorized into high-risk and low-risk category based on work in COVID-19 areas. HCWs SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM antibodies were detected using rapid immunochromatography test.
Out of 821 randomly selected HCWs, either IgM or IgG antibody was detected in 32 HCWs (32/821, 3.9%). Only IgM antibodies were detected in 14 (1.7%), only IgG was detected in 9 (1.0%), and both IgM and IgG antibodies were present in 9 HCWs. Seropositivity was significantly higher in high-risk category (5.7% vs. 2.2.%), HCWs who ever had COVID-19 related symptoms in last 3 months (5.6% vs. 2.8%), and those who had earlier tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (36.6% vs. 3.5%). Seroprevalence was highest (6.9%) among housekeeping and sanitation staff.
Overall, low seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in our HCWs is an indicator of effective infection control practice. HCW posted in dedicated COVID ward need more stringent implementation of infection prevention measures.
医护人员是感染新冠病毒最脆弱的群体。因此,评估医护人员中新冠病毒抗体的血清流行率,可以提供有关病原体暴露、传染性以及个人防护装备(PPE)使用依从性的重要数据。本研究旨在评估医护人员中新冠病毒的血清流行率,并探讨其与人口统计学特征、接触新冠患者的类别、采取的预防措施以及与新冠症状的关系。
自上次值班起至少间隔2周的医护人员有资格参与本研究。根据在新冠病区的工作情况,将入选的医护人员分为高风险和低风险类别。采用快速免疫层析法检测医护人员的新冠病毒特异性IgG和IgM抗体。
在随机选取的821名医护人员中,32人(32/821,3.9%)检测到IgM或IgG抗体。仅检测到IgM抗体的有14人(1.7%),仅检测到IgG抗体的有9人(1.0%),9名医护人员同时检测到IgM和IgG抗体。高风险类别(5.7%对2.2%)、过去3个月内有过新冠相关症状的医护人员(5.6%对2.8%)以及之前实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测新冠病毒呈阳性的人员(36.6%对3.5%)的血清阳性率显著更高。家政和保洁人员的血清流行率最高(6.9%)。
总体而言,我们的医护人员中新冠病毒抗体血清流行率较低,这表明感染控制措施有效。派驻在专门新冠病房的医护人员需要更严格地实施感染预防措施。