Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Jan;42(1):71-90. doi: 10.1002/phar.2637. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
Data regarding the use of corticosteroids for treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are conflicting. As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic progresses, more literature supporting the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS have emerged. Glucocorticoids are proposed to attenuate the inflammatory response and prevent progression to the fibroproliferative phase of ARDS through their multiple mechanisms and anti-inflammatory properties. The purpose of this systematic review was to comprehensively evaluate the literature surrounding corticosteroid use in ARDS (non-COVID-19 and COVID-19) in addition to a narrative review of clinical considerations of corticosteroid use in these patient populations. OVID Medline and EMBASE were searched. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS in adult patients on mortality outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. There were 388 studies identified, 15 of which met the inclusion criteria that included a total of 8877 patients. The studies included in our review reported a mortality benefit in 6/15 (40%) studies with benefit being seen at varying time points of mortality follow-up (ICU survival, hospital, and 28 and 60 days) in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS studies. The two non-COVID19 trials assessing lung injury score improvements found that corticosteroids led to significant improvements with corticosteroid use. The number of mechanical ventilation-free days significantly were found to be increased with the use of corticosteroids in all four studies that assessed this outcome. Corticosteroids are associated with improvements in mortality and ventilator-free days in critically ill patients with both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS, and evidence suggests their use should be encouraged in these settings. However, due to substantial differences in the corticosteroid regimens utilized in these trials, questions still remain regarding the optimal corticosteroid agent, dose, and duration in patients with ARDS.
关于皮质类固醇治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的数据存在争议。随着 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的进展,越来越多的文献支持 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 ARDS 中使用皮质类固醇。糖皮质激素通过其多种机制和抗炎特性,被认为可以减轻炎症反应并防止 ARDS 向纤维增生期进展。本系统评价的目的是全面评估皮质类固醇在 ARDS(非 COVID-19 和 COVID-19)中的应用文献,并对这些患者群体中皮质类固醇应用的临床注意事项进行叙述性综述。检索了 OVID Medline 和 EMBASE。纳入了评估皮质类固醇治疗成人 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 ARDS 患者死亡率结局的随机对照试验。使用风险偏倚 2.0 工具评估风险偏倚。共确定了 388 项研究,其中 15 项符合纳入标准,共纳入了 8877 例患者。本综述纳入的研究报告了 6/15(40%)研究的死亡率获益,在 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 ARDS 研究中,获益在不同的死亡率随访时间点(ICU 存活、住院和 28 天和 60 天)可见。评估肺损伤评分改善的两项非 COVID19 试验发现,皮质类固醇的使用导致了显著的改善。在所有评估这一结局的四项研究中,皮质类固醇的使用显著增加了无机械通气天数。皮质类固醇与 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 ARDS 重症患者的死亡率和无通气天数的改善相关,证据表明应鼓励在这些情况下使用皮质类固醇。然而,由于这些试验中皮质类固醇方案的差异很大,关于 ARDS 患者的最佳皮质类固醇药物、剂量和持续时间仍存在疑问。