• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织危机中的知识隐藏:领导的调节作用。

Knowledge hiding in organizational crisis: The moderating role of leadership.

作者信息

Nguyen Tuyet-Mai, Malik Ashish, Budhwar Pawan

机构信息

N63 2.04, 170 Kessel Road, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Griffith University, Australia.

Thuongmai University, Viet Nam.

出版信息

J Bus Res. 2022 Feb;139:161-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.026
PMID:34667337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8516615/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused organizational crises leading to shutdowns, mergers, downsizing or restructuring to minimize survival costs. In such organizational crises, employees tend to experience a loss or lack of resources, and they are more likely to engage in knowledge hiding to maintain their resources and competitive advantage. Knowledge hiding has often caused significant adverse consequences, and the research on knowledge hiding is limited. Drawing upon the Conservation of Resources and Transformational Leadership theories, a conceptual framework was developed to examine knowledge hiding behavior and its antecedents and consequences. We collected data from 281 Vietnamese employees working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results show that role conflict, job insecurity, and cynicism positively impact knowledge hiding behavior. Knowledge hiding behavior negatively affects job performance and mediates the antecedents of knowledge hiding on job performance. Transformational leadership moderated the impact of role conflict on knowledge hiding.

摘要

新冠疫情引发了组织危机,导致企业停工、合并、裁员或重组,以尽量降低生存成本。在这种组织危机中,员工往往会经历资源损失或匮乏,他们更有可能进行知识隐藏,以维持自身资源和竞争优势。知识隐藏常常会造成严重的不良后果,而关于知识隐藏的研究有限。基于资源守恒理论和变革型领导理论,构建了一个概念框架,以研究知识隐藏行为及其前因后果。我们收集了281名在新冠疫情期间工作的越南员工的数据。我们的研究结果表明,角色冲突、工作不安全感和玩世不恭的态度对知识隐藏行为有正向影响。知识隐藏行为对工作绩效有负面影响,并在知识隐藏的前因与工作绩效之间起中介作用。变革型领导调节了角色冲突对知识隐藏的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/8516615/35f9ae234b19/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/8516615/bf03edb74b9a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/8516615/806a34c1a679/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/8516615/35f9ae234b19/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/8516615/bf03edb74b9a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/8516615/806a34c1a679/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/8516615/35f9ae234b19/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge hiding in organizational crisis: The moderating role of leadership.组织危机中的知识隐藏:领导的调节作用。
J Bus Res. 2022 Feb;139:161-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
The Impact of Job Insecurity on Knowledge-Hiding Behavior: The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification and the Buffering Role of Coaching Leadership.工作不安全感对知识隐藏行为的影响:组织认同的中介作用和教练型领导的缓冲作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):16017. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316017.
3
The effect of job insecurity on knowledge hiding behavior: The mediation of psychological safety and the moderation of servant leadership.工作不安全感对知识隐藏行为的影响:心理安全感的中介作用和仆人式领导的调节作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1108881. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1108881. eCollection 2023.
4
Negative Work Attitudes and Task Performance: Mediating Role of Knowledge Hiding and Moderating Role of Servant Leadership.消极工作态度与任务绩效:知识隐藏的中介作用及仆人式领导的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:963696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963696. eCollection 2022.
5
Modeling cynicism and organizational design on job performance: Mediation and moderation mechanism.犬儒主义与组织设计对工作绩效的建模:中介与调节机制。
Heliyon. 2024 May 29;10(11):e32069. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32069. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
6
CEOs' leadership behaviors and new venture team stability: The effects of knowledge hiding and team collectivism.首席执行官的领导行为与新创企业团队稳定性:知识隐藏与团队集体主义的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 28;13:1001277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001277. eCollection 2022.
7
Does small and medium enterprise differential leadership increase subordinate knowledge hiding? Evidences from job insecurity, territorial consciousness and leadership performance expectation.中小企业的差异化领导会增加下属的知识隐藏行为吗?来自工作不安全感、领地意识和领导绩效期望的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:983669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983669. eCollection 2022.
8
Expanding the dimensions of knowledge hiding: testing a moderated mediation model and analyzing the mediating role of psychological distress using PLS-SEM.拓展知识隐藏的维度:使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)检验一个有调节的中介模型并分析心理困扰的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 27;14:1279964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1279964. eCollection 2023.
9
The Empirical Investigation Between Ethical Leadership and Knowledge-Hiding Behavior in Financial Service Sector: A Moderated-Mediated Model.金融服务业中道德领导与知识隐藏行为之间的实证研究:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:798631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798631. eCollection 2021.
10
Effect of abusive supervision on organizational cynicism (Cognitive, affective, behavioral) mediating effect of playing dumb.辱骂型监管对组织犬儒主义(认知、情感、行为)的影响——装傻的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 25;18(4):e0284884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284884. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
To share or hide under performance pressure: the role of supervisor support in shaping subordinate knowledge management behaviors.在绩效压力下分享还是隐瞒:上级支持在塑造下属知识管理行为中的作用
Front Psychol. 2025 May 27;16:1586812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1586812. eCollection 2025.
2
Working from home during COVID-19 and its impact on Indian employees' stress and creativity.新冠疫情期间居家办公及其对印度员工压力和创造力的影响。
Asian Bus Manag. 2022 Oct 10:1-25. doi: 10.1057/s41291-022-00202-5.
3
The impact of informal control on the innovation performance of female technology professionals from the perspective of role pressure.

本文引用的文献

1
Different Shades-Different Effects? Consequences of Different Types of Destructive Leadership.不同的阴暗面——不同的影响?不同类型的破坏性领导的后果。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 25;9:1289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01289. eCollection 2018.
2
Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research.变革型领导与员工心理健康:综述及未来研究方向
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):381-393. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000062. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
3
Managers as role models for health: Moderators of the relationship of transformational leadership with employee exhaustion and cynicism.
从角色压力视角看非正式控制对女性技术专业人员创新绩效的影响
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 29;15:1378056. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378056. eCollection 2024.
4
Modeling cynicism and organizational design on job performance: Mediation and moderation mechanism.犬儒主义与组织设计对工作绩效的建模:中介与调节机制。
Heliyon. 2024 May 29;10(11):e32069. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32069. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
5
Revisiting the role of HR in the age of AI: bringing humans and machines closer together in the workplace.重新审视人工智能时代人力资源的角色:在工作场所拉近人与机器的距离。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jan 15;6:1272823. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1272823. eCollection 2023.
6
The creative behavior of virtual idol fans: a psychological perspective based on MOA theory.虚拟偶像粉丝的创造性行为:基于MOA理论的心理学视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 21;14:1290790. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1290790. eCollection 2023.
7
Knowledge risk management in banks - An area for improving organizational performance.银行中的知识风险管理——提升组织绩效的一个领域。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 4;9(11):e22064. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22064. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Knowledge hiding and individual task performance: The role of individual creativity as mediator.知识隐藏与个体任务绩效:个体创造力作为中介变量的作用
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 21;9(11):e21035. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21035. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Does organizational justice facet matters in knowledge hiding?组织公正维度在知识隐藏中重要吗?
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 17;9(8):e18372. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18372. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
The effect of job insecurity on knowledge hiding behavior: The mediation of psychological safety and the moderation of servant leadership.工作不安全感对知识隐藏行为的影响:心理安全感的中介作用和仆人式领导的调节作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1108881. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1108881. eCollection 2023.
管理者作为健康的榜样:变革型领导与员工疲惫和犬儒主义关系的调节因素。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Oct;22(4):492-502. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000044. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family.过于投入?工作投入与工作干扰家庭之间关系的资源保存观点。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1452-65. doi: 10.1037/a0017595.
5
Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model.社会支持来源与倦怠:资源守恒模型的元分析检验
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1134-45. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134.
6
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
7
Health effects of job insecurity among employees in the Swiss general population.瑞士普通人群中员工工作不安全感对健康的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(3):477-90. doi: 10.2190/B1KM-VGN7-50GF-8XJ4.
8
Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.资源守恒:一种对压力进行概念化的新尝试。
Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513.