Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, UKGM, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039 Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Hans-Meerwein-Str. 6, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, UKGM, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039 Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Hans-Meerwein-Str. 6, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 15;297:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in repeated, prolonged restrictions in daily life. Social distancing policies as well as health anxiety are thought to lead to mental health impairment. However, there is lack of longitudinal data identifying at-risk populations particularly vulnerable for elevated Covid-19-related distress. We collected data of N = 1268 participants (n = 622 healthy controls (HC), and n = 646 patients with major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder) at baseline before (2014-2018) and during (April-May 2020) the first lockdown in Germany. We obtained information on Covid-19 restrictions (number and subjective impact of Covid-19 events), and Covid-19-related distress (i.e., subjective fear and isolation). Using multiple linear regression models including trait variables and individual Covid-19 impact, we sought to predict Covid-19-related distress. HC and patients reported similar numbers of Covid-19-related events, and similar subjective impact rating. They did not differ in Covid-19-related subjective fear. Patients reported significantly higher subjective isolation. 30.5% of patients reported worsened self-rated symptoms since the pandemic. Subjective fear in all participants was associated with trait anxiety (STAI-T), conscientiousness (NEO-FFI), Covid-19 impact, and sex. Subjective isolation in HC was associated with social support (FSozu), Covid-19 impact, age, and sex; in patients, it was associated with social support and Covid-19 impact. Our data shed light on differential effects of the pandemic in psychiatric patients and HC. Low social support, high conscientiousness and high trait anxiety are associated with elevated distress during the pandemic. These variables might be valuable for the creation of risk profiles of Covid-19-related distress for direct translation into clinical practice.
新冠疫情导致日常生活中反复出现长时间的限制。社交距离政策和健康焦虑被认为会导致心理健康受损。然而,缺乏能够识别特定高危人群的纵向数据,这些人群更容易受到与新冠相关的困扰。我们收集了德国首次封锁期间(2020 年 4 月至 5 月)之前(2014-2018 年)和期间的数据,共 1268 名参与者,包括 622 名健康对照者(HC)和 646 名患有重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍、精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的患者。我们获得了关于新冠限制(新冠事件的数量和主观影响)和新冠相关困扰(即主观恐惧和隔离)的信息。我们使用包括特质变量和个体新冠影响的多元线性回归模型,来预测新冠相关困扰。HC 和患者报告了相似数量的新冠相关事件,且主观影响评分相似。他们在新冠相关的主观恐惧方面没有差异。患者报告的主观隔离程度更高。30.5%的患者报告自疫情以来自我评估症状恶化。所有参与者的主观恐惧与特质焦虑(STAI-T)、尽责性(NEO-FFI)、新冠影响和性别有关。HC 的主观隔离与社会支持(FSozu)、新冠影响、年龄和性别有关;在患者中,它与社会支持和新冠影响有关。我们的数据揭示了疫情对精神科患者和 HC 的不同影响。低社会支持、高尽责性和高特质焦虑与大流行期间的困扰增加有关。这些变量可能对创建与新冠相关的困扰的风险概况有价值,可直接转化为临床实践。