Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska at Omaha.
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Nov 4;30(6):2635-2642. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00058. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Purpose This study compared performance on three-word fluency measures among individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), and examined the relationship between word fluency and other measures of language and speech. Method This study included 106 adults with PPA and 30 adults with PPAOS. PPA participants were divided into three clinical subgroups: semantic (svPPA), logopenic (lvPPA), and nonfluent/agrammatic with or without apraxia of speech (nfPPA). Category fluency, letter fluency, and action/verb fluency tasks were administered to all participants. Results The four clinical groups performed abnormally on the word fluency measures, although not to a degree that represented high sensitivity to their PPA or PPAOS diagnosis. All PPA subgroups produced fewer words compared to individuals with PPAOS on all word fluency measures. Moderate correlations were found between word fluency and aphasia severity and naming performance in some of the clinical groups. Conclusions Word fluency measures are often challenging for individuals with PPA and PPAOS, but they are not of equal difficulty, with letter fluency being the most difficult. Differences among word fluency tests also vary to some degree as a function of the clinical group in question, with least impairment in PPAOS. However, the findings of this study do not support statistically significant differences in word fluency task performance among the PPA subgroups. Correlations suggest that word fluency performance in PPA is at least partly related to aphasia severity.
目的 本研究比较了原发性进行性失语症(PPA)和进行性构音障碍(PPAOS)患者在三项单词流畅性测试中的表现,并探讨了单词流畅性与语言和言语其他测量指标之间的关系。
方法 本研究纳入了 106 名 PPA 患者和 30 名 PPAOS 患者。PPA 患者被分为三个临床亚组:语义性(svPPA)、流利性/失语法性(nfPPA)和经皮质感觉性失语症(tCS)。所有参与者均接受了类别流畅性、字母流畅性和动作/动词流畅性测试。
结果 尽管四个临床组在单词流畅性测试中的表现异常,但并未达到对其 PPA 或 PPAOS 诊断具有高敏感性的程度。与 PPAOS 患者相比,所有 PPA 亚组在所有单词流畅性测试中生成的单词数都较少。在一些临床组中,单词流畅性与失语症严重程度和命名表现之间存在中等程度的相关性。
结论 单词流畅性测试对 PPA 和 PPAOS 患者来说通常具有挑战性,但它们的难度并不相同,字母流畅性测试最难。在一定程度上,不同的单词流畅性测试之间的差异也因所涉及的临床组而异,其中 PPAOS 患者的损害最小。然而,本研究的结果并不支持 PPA 亚组在单词流畅性任务表现上存在统计学上显著差异。相关性表明,PPA 患者的单词流畅性表现至少部分与失语症严重程度相关。