• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉西他滨、顺铂和纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇序贯维持治疗晚期胆囊癌的长期疗效:病例报告及文献综述

Long-Term Response to Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Followed by Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review.

作者信息

Liu Ting, Li Qing, Zhang Wenjie, Zhu Qing

机构信息

Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 5;11:733955. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.733955. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.733955
PMID:34676166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8523915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common and devastating tumor type of biliary tract cancer (BTC) with poor outcomes. A new combined regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nab-paclitaxel is currently considered an effective option for patients with advanced BTC following the results of a phase II trial. In addition, maintenance therapy after first-line treatment has been shown to improve disease control rate of various solid tumors but has not been evaluated for GBC patients. The scenario we report herein is of a metastatic GBC patient treated with the triple-drug regimen followed by maintenance therapy with capecitabine or S-1, who achieved a long-term survival benefit.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 68-year-old man was diagnosed with gallbladder adenocarcinoma with liver, supra-diaphragmatic, and abdominal lymph node metastases (cT3N2M1, stage IVB). Partial response (PR) was achieved after five cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy. A further three cycles of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen yielded a complete response of all tumor lesions. Subsequent administration of maintenance therapy with capecitabine followed by S-1 achieved a disease-free survival of 15 months for the patient. Moreover, the patient remained responsive to this triple-drug regimen when the disease progressed, achieving PR after two cycles of chemotherapy. Overall, the treatment regimens were well tolerated with no grade 3 or higher adverse effects occurring. Notably, the serum carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) levels were closely related to the treatment response and increased before the lesions were found on PET-CT during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that adding nab-paclitaxel into gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen may result in a favorable efficacy in patients with advanced GBC. Further maintenance therapy with capecitabine or S-1 after first-line therapy appeared to be a reasonable option for these patients, and it is valuable to monitor CA199 levels during treatment and follow-up.

摘要

背景

胆囊癌(GBC)是胆道癌(BTC)中最常见且危害极大的肿瘤类型,预后较差。根据一项II期试验结果,吉西他滨、顺铂联合纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇的新联合方案目前被认为是晚期BTC患者的有效选择。此外,一线治疗后的维持治疗已被证明可提高各种实体瘤的疾病控制率,但尚未在GBC患者中进行评估。我们在此报告的病例是一名转移性GBC患者,接受三联药物方案治疗后,再用卡培他滨或S-1进行维持治疗,获得了长期生存益处。

病例介绍

一名68岁男性被诊断为胆囊腺癌,伴有肝、膈上及腹部淋巴结转移(cT3N2M1,IVB期)。吉西他滨和顺铂化疗五个周期后达到部分缓解(PR)。纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨-顺铂方案再进行三个周期治疗后,所有肿瘤病灶完全缓解。随后用卡培他滨继以S-1进行维持治疗,该患者无病生存期达15个月。此外,疾病进展时该患者对这种三联药物方案仍有反应,化疗两个周期后达到PR。总体而言,治疗方案耐受性良好,未出现3级或更高等级的不良反应。值得注意的是,血清糖类抗原199(CA199)水平与治疗反应密切相关,随访期间在PET-CT发现病灶之前升高。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在吉西他滨-顺铂方案中加入纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇可能对晚期GBC患者产生良好疗效。一线治疗后用卡培他滨或S-1进行进一步维持治疗似乎是这些患者的合理选择,在治疗和随访期间监测CA199水平很有价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e077/8523915/17f4b6594bed/fonc-11-733955-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e077/8523915/48358600adbb/fonc-11-733955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e077/8523915/feac152a47b1/fonc-11-733955-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e077/8523915/17f4b6594bed/fonc-11-733955-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e077/8523915/48358600adbb/fonc-11-733955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e077/8523915/feac152a47b1/fonc-11-733955-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e077/8523915/17f4b6594bed/fonc-11-733955-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Response to Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Followed by Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review.吉西他滨、顺铂和纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇序贯维持治疗晚期胆囊癌的长期疗效:病例报告及文献综述
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 5;11:733955. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.733955. eCollection 2021.
2
Successful conversion surgery for locally advanced gallbladder cancer after gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy.吉西他滨和纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇化疗后局部晚期胆囊癌的成功转化手术
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;12:977963. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.977963. eCollection 2022.
3
A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的 II 期临床研究
Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Apr;56(2):602-615. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.726. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
4
Nab-paclitaxel: An effective third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced, unresectable gallbladder cancer.纳武利尤单抗:晚期不可切除胆囊癌三线治疗的有效药物。
Indian J Med Res. 2020 Nov;152(5):475-481. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_930_18.
5
Prolonged progression-free survival achieved by gemcitabine, cisplatin, and albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers.吉西他滨、顺铂和白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗晚期胆管癌可实现长期无进展生存。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Jan 19;16:17588359231225045. doi: 10.1177/17588359231225045. eCollection 2024.
6
PD-1 inhibitors plus nab-paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer in a second-line setting: A retrospective analysis of a case series.二线治疗中PD-1抑制剂联合含白蛋白结合型紫杉醇化疗用于晚期胆囊癌:一项病例系列回顾性分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 16;12:1006075. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1006075. eCollection 2022.
7
Real-world efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: a multicenter retrospective analysis.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨-顺铂治疗晚期胆管癌患者的真实世界疗效和安全性:一项多中心回顾性分析
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Aug 7;13:17588359211035983. doi: 10.1177/17588359211035983. eCollection 2021.
8
Durable response to the combination of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in a metastatic extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.帕博利珠单抗与白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合治疗转移性肝外胆管癌的持久反应:一例报告及文献综述
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 28;13:1037646. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1037646. eCollection 2022.
9
Successful treatment of unresectable gallbladder cancer with low-dose paclitaxel as palliative chemotherapy after failure of gemcitabine and oral S-1: A case report.吉西他滨和口服S-1治疗失败后,低剂量紫杉醇作为姑息化疗成功治疗不可切除胆囊癌:一例报告
Oncol Lett. 2012 Dec;4(6):1281-1284. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.909. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
10
Nab-paclitaxel plus tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial.纳米紫杉醇联合替吉奥胶囊作为晚期胆管腺癌一线治疗的Ⅱ期临床试验
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Feb 28;12(1):37-44. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-172. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC.胆囊癌的危险因素与预后因素
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 18;13(14):4201. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144201.
2
Case report: Preliminary response to tislelizumab plus S-1 in patients with metastatic gallbladder carcinoma: A report of five cases and a literature review.病例报告:替雷利珠单抗联合替吉奥治疗转移性胆囊癌患者的初步疗效:五例报告及文献复习。
Front Immunol. 2023 Mar 20;14:1144371. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1144371. eCollection 2023.
3
Giant Gallbladder Tumor, Unusual Cancer-Case Report and Short Review of Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
A Low Tumor Mutational Burden and Mutations Are Predictors of a Negative Response to PD-1 Blockade in MSI-H/dMMR Gastrointestinal Tumors.低肿瘤突变负担和突变是 MSI-H/dMMR 胃肠道肿瘤对 PD-1 阻断治疗无应答的预测因子。
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jul 1;27(13):3714-3724. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0401. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
Biliary tract cancer.胆道癌。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):428-444. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00153-7.
3
Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Using Lower Dosage and Higher Frequency vs Observation on Disease-Free Survival Among Patients With Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Had Received Standard Treatment: The SYSUCC-001 Randomized Clinical Trial.
巨大胆囊肿瘤,罕见癌症——病例报告及文献简短综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;13(2):194. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020194.
4
Successful conversion surgery for locally advanced gallbladder cancer after gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy.吉西他滨和纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇化疗后局部晚期胆囊癌的成功转化手术
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;12:977963. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.977963. eCollection 2022.
卡培他滨维持治疗较低剂量和较高频率与观察对接受标准治疗的早期三阴性乳腺癌患者无病生存的影响:SYSUCC-001 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 5;325(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23370.
4
Integrative molecular characterisation of gallbladder cancer reveals micro-environment-associated subtypes.胆囊癌的综合分子特征分析揭示了与微环境相关的亚型。
J Hepatol. 2021 May;74(5):1132-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Pathogenesis of Cholangiocarcinoma.胆管癌的发病机制
Annu Rev Pathol. 2021 Jan 24;16:433-463. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-030220-020455. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
Overview of current targeted therapy in gallbladder cancer.胆囊癌的当前靶向治疗概述。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):230. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00324-2.
7
The PD-1 expression balance between effector and regulatory T cells predicts the clinical efficacy of PD-1 blockade therapies.效应 T 细胞和调节性 T 细胞之间的 PD-1 表达平衡可预测 PD-1 阻断疗法的临床疗效。
Nat Immunol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1346-1358. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0769-3. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):2008-2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0.
9
Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial.吉西他滨联合 S-1 对比吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期/复发性胆道癌:FUGA-BT(JCOG1113)随机 III 期临床试验。
Ann Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;30(12):1950-1958. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz402.
10
Distinct PD-L1/PD1 Profiles and Clinical Implications in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients with Different Risk Factors.不同危险因素的肝内胆管癌患者中 PD-L1/PD1 的不同表达谱及其临床意义。
Theranostics. 2019 Jul 9;9(16):4678-4687. doi: 10.7150/thno.36276. eCollection 2019.