• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对心血管疾病患者至关重要的价值观作为电子健康设计与评估的基础:混合方法研究

Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Bente Britt E, Wentzel Jobke, Groeneveld Rik Gh, IJzerman Renée Vh, de Buisonjé David R, Breeman Linda D, Janssen Veronica R, Kraaijenhagen Roderik, Pieterse Marcel E, Evers Andrea Wm, van Gemert-Pijnen Julia Ewc

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Research Group IT Innovations in Health Care, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Cardio. 2021 Oct 22;5(2):e33252. doi: 10.2196/33252.

DOI:10.2196/33252
PMID:34677130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8571692/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth interventions are developed to support and facilitate patients with lifestyle changes and self-care tasks after being diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease (CVD). Creating long-lasting effects on lifestyle change and health outcomes with eHealth interventions is challenging and requires good understanding of patient values.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify values of importance to patients with CVD to aid in designing a technological lifestyle platform.

METHODS

A mixed method design was applied, combining data from usability testing with an additional online survey study, to validate the outcomes of the usability tests.

RESULTS

A total of 11 relevant patient values were identified, including the need for security, support, not wanting to feel anxious, tailoring of treatment, and personalized, accessible care. The validation survey shows that all values but one (value 9: To have extrinsic motivation to accomplish goals or activities [related to health/lifestyle]) were regarded as important/very important. A rating of very unimportant or unimportant was given by less than 2% of the respondents (value 1: 4/641, 0.6%; value 2: 10/641, 1.6%; value 3: 9/641, 1.4%; value 4: 5/641, 0.8%; value 5: 10/641, 1.6%; value 6: 4/641, 0.6%; value 7: 10/639, 1.6%; value 8: 4/639, 0.6%; value 10: 3/636, 0.5%; value 11: 4/636, 0.6%) to all values except but one (value 9: 56/636, 8.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high consensus among patients regarding the identified values reflecting goals and themes central to their lives, while living with or managing their CVD. The identified values can serve as a foundation for future research to translate and integrate these values into the design of the eHealth technology. This may call for prioritization of values, as not all values can be met equally.

摘要

背景

电子健康干预措施旨在帮助和促进心血管疾病(CVD)患者在被诊断后改变生活方式并完成自我护理任务。通过电子健康干预措施对生活方式改变和健康结果产生持久影响具有挑战性,需要充分了解患者的价值观。

目的

本研究的目的是确定对CVD患者重要的价值观,以帮助设计一个技术生活方式平台。

方法

采用混合方法设计,将可用性测试的数据与另一项在线调查研究相结合,以验证可用性测试的结果。

结果

共确定了11个相关的患者价值观,包括对安全性、支持的需求,不想感到焦虑,治疗的个性化,以及个性化、可获得的护理。验证性调查显示,除了一个价值观(价值观9:有外在动力来完成目标或活动[与健康/生活方式相关])外,所有价值观都被认为是重要/非常重要。不到2%的受访者对所有价值观给出了非常不重要或不重要的评价(价值观1:4/641,0.6%;价值观2:10/641,1.6%;价值观3:9/641,1.4%;价值观4:5/641,0.8%;价值观5:10/641,1.6%;价值观6:4/641,0.6%;价值观7:10/639,1.6%;价值观8:4/639,0.6%;价值观10:3/636,0.5%;价值观11:4/636,0.6%),但对一个价值观(价值观9:56/636,8.8%)除外。

结论

患者对于所确定的反映其在患有或管理CVD期间生活核心目标和主题的价值观高度一致。所确定的价值观可为未来研究提供基础,以便将这些价值观转化并整合到电子健康技术的设计中。这可能需要对价值观进行优先级排序,因为并非所有价值观都能得到同等满足。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26ae/8571692/f6264d8a4a30/cardio_v5i2e33252_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26ae/8571692/f6264d8a4a30/cardio_v5i2e33252_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26ae/8571692/f6264d8a4a30/cardio_v5i2e33252_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study.对心血管疾病患者至关重要的价值观作为电子健康设计与评估的基础:混合方法研究
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Oct 22;5(2):e33252. doi: 10.2196/33252.
2
Implementation and User Evaluation of an eHealth Technology Platform Supporting Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in Managing Their Health After a Cardiac Event: Mixed Methods Study.支持心血管疾病患者在心脏事件后管理自身健康的电子健康技术平台的实施与用户评估:混合方法研究
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Mar 24;7:e43781. doi: 10.2196/43781.
3
A multi-stakeholder approach to eHealth development: Promoting sustained healthy living among cardiovascular patients.多利益相关者方法促进电子健康发展:促进心血管病患者的持续健康生活。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Mar;147:104364. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104364. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
4
Toward the Value Sensitive Design of eHealth Technologies to Support Self-management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Content Analysis.迈向支持心血管疾病自我管理的电子健康技术的价值敏感设计:内容分析
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Dec 1;5(2):e31985. doi: 10.2196/31985.
5
Identifying Persuasive Design Principles and Behavior Change Techniques Supporting End User Values and Needs in eHealth Interventions for Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance: Qualitative Study.确定有说服力的设计原则和行为改变技术,以支持电子健康干预长期体重维持的最终用户的价值观和需求:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 30;22(11):e22598. doi: 10.2196/22598.
6
Living Lab Data of Patient Needs and Expectations for eHealth-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Germany and Spain From the TIMELY Study: Cross-Sectional Analysis.德国和西班牙基于电子健康的心脏康复患者需求和期望的生活实验室数据:TIMELY 研究的横断面分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 22;26:e53991. doi: 10.2196/53991.
7
Importance of Patient Involvement in Creating Content for eHealth Interventions: Qualitative Case Report in Orthopedics.患者参与创建电子健康干预内容的重要性:骨科定性病例报告
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 3;6(11):e39637. doi: 10.2196/39637.
8
A User-Centered Approach to an Evidence-Based Electronic Health Pain Management Intervention for People With Chronic Pain: Design and Development of EPIO.一种以用户为中心的针对慢性疼痛患者的循证电子健康疼痛管理干预方法:EPIO的设计与开发
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 21;22(1):e15889. doi: 10.2196/15889.
9
Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care.促进生活方式支持和电子健康解决方案的因素及障碍:在心脏护理领域工作的医疗保健专业人员的访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 15;23(10):e25646. doi: 10.2196/25646.
10
Designing the Optimal Digital Health Intervention for Patients' Use Before and After Elective Orthopedic Surgery: Qualitative Study.设计优化的数字健康干预措施,以满足择期骨科手术前后患者的使用需求:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e25885. doi: 10.2196/25885.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence Patterns of Patients Using Remote Patient Management After Myocardial Infarction: Mixed Methods Persona Approach.心肌梗死后使用远程患者管理的患者依从模式:混合方法人物角色法
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Aug 18;9:e56236. doi: 10.2196/56236.
2
Design Requirements for Cardiac Telerehabilitation Technologies Supporting Athlete Values: Qualitative Interview Study.支持运动员价值观的心脏远程康复技术的设计要求:定性访谈研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr 17;12:e62986. doi: 10.2196/62986.
3
Cardiac Rehabilitation practitioners' views on patients' psychological needs: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Personas for Better Targeted eHealth Technologies: User-Centered Design Approach.用于更精准靶向电子健康技术的用户角色:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 15;9(1):e24172. doi: 10.2196/24172.
2
Identifying Persuasive Design Principles and Behavior Change Techniques Supporting End User Values and Needs in eHealth Interventions for Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance: Qualitative Study.确定有说服力的设计原则和行为改变技术,以支持电子健康干预长期体重维持的最终用户的价值观和需求:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 30;22(11):e22598. doi: 10.2196/22598.
3
Interventions to Improve Adherence to Cardiovascular Medication: What About Gender Differences? A Systematic Literature Review.
心脏康复从业者对患者心理需求的看法:一项定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 3;15:1434779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1434779. eCollection 2024.
4
Development of a patient-centered app in Germany as a special health and organizational support by surveying patients with cardiovascular diseases.通过对心血管疾病患者进行调查,在德国开发一款以患者为中心的应用程序,作为一种特殊的健康和组织支持。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02542-y.
5
Tailoring remote patient management in cardiovascular risk management for healthcare professionals using panel management: a qualitative study.利用小组管理为医疗保健专业人员定制心血管风险管理中的远程患者管理:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 20;25(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02355-y.
6
Targeting behavioral factors with digital health and shared decision-making to promote cardiac rehabilitation-a narrative review.利用数字健康和共同决策针对行为因素以促进心脏康复——一项叙述性综述
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 23;6:1324544. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1324544. eCollection 2024.
7
Implementation and User Evaluation of an eHealth Technology Platform Supporting Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in Managing Their Health After a Cardiac Event: Mixed Methods Study.支持心血管疾病患者在心脏事件后管理自身健康的电子健康技术平台的实施与用户评估:混合方法研究
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Mar 24;7:e43781. doi: 10.2196/43781.
8
Toward the Value Sensitive Design of eHealth Technologies to Support Self-management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Content Analysis.迈向支持心血管疾病自我管理的电子健康技术的价值敏感设计:内容分析
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Dec 1;5(2):e31985. doi: 10.2196/31985.
改善心血管药物依从性的干预措施:性别差异如何?一项系统文献综述。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Oct 29;14:2055-2070. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S260562. eCollection 2020.
4
Patient perspectives on priorities for research on conventional and sex- and gender-related cardiovascular risk factors.患者对传统及与性别相关的心血管危险因素研究重点的看法。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):656-661. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01497-9. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Evaluation of a Web-Based Self-Management Program for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Explorative Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的心血管疾病患者自我管理计划评估:探索性随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 24;22(7):e17422. doi: 10.2196/17422.
6
Supporting Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Metaethnography Review of Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Research and Development.通过远程监测技术支持心血管疾病的自我管理:对研发中使用的框架、模型和理论的元民族志综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 21;22(5):e16157. doi: 10.2196/16157.
7
Tailoring Persuasive Electronic Health Strategies for Older Adults on the Basis of Personal Motivation: Web-Based Survey Study.基于个人动机为老年人量身定制有说服力的电子健康策略:网络调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 6;21(9):11759. doi: 10.2196/11759.
8
BENEFIT for all: An ecosystem to facilitate sustained healthy living and reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease.全民受益:一个促进持续健康生活并减轻心血管疾病负担的生态系统。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Apr;26(6):606-608. doi: 10.1177/2047487318816388. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
9
Self-efficacy Mediates the Relationship Between Motivation and Physical Activity in Patients With Heart Failure.自我效能感在心力衰竭患者的动机与体力活动之间起中介作用。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):211-216. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000456.
10
The Human Behaviour-Change Project: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation.人类行为改变项目:利用人工智能和机器学习的力量进行证据综合和解释。
Implement Sci. 2017 Oct 18;12(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0641-5.