• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共情与情绪内隐理论关系的跨文化比较(中国与俄罗斯)

Cross-Cultural Comparison of Relationships between Empathy and Implicit Theories of Emotions (in Chinese and Russians).

作者信息

Kornilova Tatiana, Zhou Qiuqi

机构信息

General Psychology Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Mokhovaya Street, 11/9, 125009 Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Oct 11;11(10):137. doi: 10.3390/bs11100137.

DOI:10.3390/bs11100137
PMID:34677230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533593/
Abstract

The current manuscript presents the results of a cross-cultural comparison of the relationships between empathy and implicit theories of emotion in individuals from China and Russia. We hypothesized that the members of the Chinese culture would differ from the more Western Russian participants in terms of relationships between the various components of the emotional domain. Thus, we aimed to identify latent personality profiles while hypothesizing that the Chinese sample would demonstrate more prominent links between empathy and implicit theories regarding the possibility of controlling emotions. We also assumed that immediate social context could affect the results, and therefore, we compare two groups of Chinese participants-those living in China and those living in Russia, predominantly studying in Russian universities. The initial sample included Russians (N = 523), Chinese living in Russia (N = 376), and Chinese living in China (N = 423). However, following matching procedures to enable the sociodemographic comparability of samples, the final comparison was reduced to a final sample of Russians (N = 400), a sample of Chinese living in Russia (N = 363), and a sample of Chinese living in China (N = 421). We used latent class analysis and correlation analyses to test the study hypotheses. The study found that, unlike Russians, the Chinese participants demonstrated a positive correlation between incremental implicit theories of emotions and empathy. We also established significant group and gender differences. Russian women reported higher affective empathy than men, whereas Chinese women demonstrated higher affective empathy and cognitive empathy, as well as incremental implicit theories of emotion.

摘要

本手稿展示了对中国和俄罗斯个体的共情与内隐情绪理论之间关系的跨文化比较结果。我们假设,在情感领域的各个组成部分之间的关系方面,中国文化背景的成员会与更具西方文化背景的俄罗斯参与者有所不同。因此,我们旨在识别潜在的人格特征,同时假设中国样本在共情与关于情绪控制可能性的内隐理论之间会表现出更显著的联系。我们还认为即时的社会环境可能会影响结果,因此,我们比较了两组中国参与者——居住在中国的和居住在俄罗斯(主要在俄罗斯大学学习)的。初始样本包括俄罗斯人(N = 523)、居住在俄罗斯的中国人(N = 376)和居住在中国的中国人(N = 423)。然而,经过匹配程序以使样本在社会人口统计学上具有可比性后,最终比较的样本为俄罗斯人(N = 400)、居住在俄罗斯的中国人(N = 363)和居住在中国的中国人(N = 421)。我们使用潜在类别分析和相关分析来检验研究假设。研究发现,与俄罗斯人不同,中国参与者在情绪的增量内隐理论与共情之间表现出正相关。我们还发现了显著的群体和性别差异。俄罗斯女性报告的情感共情高于男性,而中国女性表现出更高的情感共情和认知共情,以及情绪的增量内隐理论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/22c04f7f09ba/behavsci-11-00137-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/a502396bd327/behavsci-11-00137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/6b2fcc25cbf5/behavsci-11-00137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/f9528f39c984/behavsci-11-00137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/a193d4bc1b57/behavsci-11-00137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/af5982c1ac84/behavsci-11-00137-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/3f916d2cf05c/behavsci-11-00137-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/22c04f7f09ba/behavsci-11-00137-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/a502396bd327/behavsci-11-00137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/6b2fcc25cbf5/behavsci-11-00137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/f9528f39c984/behavsci-11-00137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/a193d4bc1b57/behavsci-11-00137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/af5982c1ac84/behavsci-11-00137-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/3f916d2cf05c/behavsci-11-00137-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7232/8533593/22c04f7f09ba/behavsci-11-00137-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-Cultural Comparison of Relationships between Empathy and Implicit Theories of Emotions (in Chinese and Russians).共情与情绪内隐理论关系的跨文化比较(中国与俄罗斯)
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Oct 11;11(10):137. doi: 10.3390/bs11100137.
2
Personality regulation of decisions on physical distancing: Cross-cultural comparison (Russia, Azerbaijan, China).身体距离决策的人格调节:跨文化比较(俄罗斯、阿塞拜疆、中国)
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110418. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110418. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting.《认知与情感共情问卷》在中国背景下的效度验证与拓展
Psych J. 2019 Dec;8(4):439-448. doi: 10.1002/pchj.281. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Cognitive and Affective Empathy Relate Differentially to Emotion Regulation.认知共情和情感共情与情绪调节的关系存在差异。
Affect Sci. 2022;3(1):118-134. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00062-w. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
5
Implicit theories and ability emotional intelligence.内隐理论与能力型情商。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 22;6:700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00700. eCollection 2015.
6
The Chinese version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale for children: Validation, gender invariance and associated factors.儿童认知、情感和躯体共情量表的中文版:验证、性别不变性及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2018 May 7;13(5):e0195268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195268. eCollection 2018.
7
Development of Emotion Word Comprehension in Chinese Children from 2 to 13 Years Old: Relationships with Valence and Empathy.2至13岁中国儿童情绪词理解能力的发展:与效价和同理心的关系
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 8;10(12):e0143712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143712. eCollection 2015.
8
Validation of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in patients with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.验证用于评估精神分裂症、重性抑郁症和双相情感障碍患者认知和情感共情的问卷。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Nov;25(6):466-479. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2020.1846025. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Psychometric Properties of Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE): Reliability and Factor Analysis Study in Turkish Sample.认知与情感共情问卷(QCAE)的心理测量特性:土耳其样本中的信效度及因子分析研究
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Aug 26;58(3):228-233. doi: 10.29399/npa.27248. eCollection 2021.
10
Implicit theories of emotion: affective and social outcomes across a major life transition.情绪的内隐理论:重大人生转折中的情感与社会结果
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):731-44. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.731.

引用本文的文献

1
No Sex-based Differences in Self-reported Empathy between Patients with Schizophrenia and Control Subjects.精神分裂症患者与对照受试者自我报告的同理心无性别差异。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024 Oct;52(5):670-677. doi: 10.62641/aep.v52i5.1784.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of implicit theories in mental health symptoms, emotion regulation, and hypothetical treatment choices in college students.内隐理论在大学生心理健康症状、情绪调节及假设性治疗选择中的作用。
Cognit Ther Res. 2015 Apr;39(2):120-139. doi: 10.1007/s10608-014-9652-6. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
2
Personality regulation of decisions on physical distancing: Cross-cultural comparison (Russia, Azerbaijan, China).身体距离决策的人格调节:跨文化比较(俄罗斯、阿塞拜疆、中国)
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110418. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110418. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
The Emotional Path to Action: Empathy Promotes Physical Distancing and Wearing of Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
从情感层面促进行动:同理心助力新冠疫情期间保持社交距离和佩戴口罩
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1363-1373. doi: 10.1177/0956797620964422. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Implicit theories of emotion and mental health during adolescence: the mediating role of emotion regulation.青少年时期情绪和心理健康的内隐理论:情绪调节的中介作用。
Cogn Emot. 2021 Mar;35(2):367-374. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1817727. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
5
Associations of emotional intelligence and gratitude with empathy in medical students.医学生情绪智力和感恩与共情的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02041-4.
6
Valuing emotional control in social anxiety disorder: A multimethod study of emotion beliefs and emotion regulation.重视社交焦虑障碍中的情绪控制:一项关于情绪信念和情绪调节的多方法研究。
Emotion. 2021 Jun;21(4):842-855. doi: 10.1037/emo0000750. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
A meta-analysis of the possible behavioural and biological variables linking trait emotional intelligence to health.一项关于将特质情绪智力与健康联系起来的可能行为和生物学变量的荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Jun;14(2):220-244. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1641423. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
8
Relations Between Dimensions of Emotional Intelligence, Specific Aspects of Empathy, and Non-verbal Sensitivity.情商维度、同理心的具体方面与非言语敏感性之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 14;10:1066. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01066. eCollection 2019.
9
Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting.《认知与情感共情问卷》在中国背景下的效度验证与拓展
Psych J. 2019 Dec;8(4):439-448. doi: 10.1002/pchj.281. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Empathy in Chinese eight-year medical program students: differences by school year, educational stage, and future career preference.中国八年制医学专业学生的同理心:因学年、教育阶段和未来职业偏好的不同而有所差异。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Oct 22;18(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1348-2.