Nam Na-Eun, Shin Seung-Ho, Lim Jung-Hwa, Shim June-Sung, Kim Jong-Eun
BK21 FOUR Project, Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;14(20):6207. doi: 10.3390/ma14206207.
This study analyzed the surface roughness and waviness, Vickers hardness (VHN), and color changes of six types of 3D printed resins and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials after artificial toothbrushing. The average surface roughness height (Ra) change of Formlabs denture teeth A2 resin (FMLB) was not significant between after artificial toothbrushing (0.17 ± 0.02 μm and 0.17 ± 0.05 μm, respectively; mean ± standard deviation). However, the Ra value increased significantly in all remaining groups. Regarding waviness, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) had the largest increases in average waviness height (Wa) and maximum surface waviness height (Wz) between, before (0.43 ± 0.23 μm and 0.08 ± 0.02 μm), and after (8.67 ± 4.03 μm, 1.30 ± 0.58 μm) toothbrushing. There were no significant changes in Wa for Formlabs denture teeth A2 resin (FMLB) and NextDent C&B (NXT). After artificial toothbrushing, the dispersed-filler composite (DFC) group had the largest color difference (ΔE, of 2.4 ± 0.9), and the remaining materials had smaller changes than the clinical acceptance threshold of ΔE = 2.25. The VHN of FMLB and NXT were 9.1 ± 0.4 and 15.5 ± 0.4, respectively, and were not affected by artificial toothbrushing. The flexural strengths of the 3D printed materials were 139.4 ± 40.5 MPa and 163.9 ± 14.0 MPa for FMLB and NXT, respectively, which were similar to those of the polycarbonate and PMMA groups (155.2 ± 23.6 MPa and 108.0 ± 8.1 MPa, respectively). This study found that the evaluated 3D printed materials had mechanical and optical properties comparable to those of CAD/CAM materials and were stable even after artificial toothbrushing and hydrothermal aging.
本研究分析了六种类型的3D打印树脂以及计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)材料在人工刷牙后的表面粗糙度和波纹度、维氏硬度(VHN)以及颜色变化。Formlabs义齿A2树脂(FMLB)在人工刷牙前后的平均表面粗糙度高度(Ra)变化不显著(分别为0.17±0.02μm和0.17±0.05μm;均值±标准差)。然而,其余所有组的Ra值均显著增加。关于波纹度,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)在刷牙前后的平均波纹度高度(Wa)和最大表面波纹度高度(Wz)增加幅度最大(刷牙前分别为0.43±0.23μm和0.08±0.02μm,刷牙后分别为8.67±4.03μm、1.30±0.58μm)。Formlabs义齿A2树脂(FMLB)和NextDent C&B(NXT)的Wa没有显著变化。人工刷牙后,分散填料复合材料(DFC)组的色差(ΔE)最大(为2.4±0.9),其余材料的变化小于临床可接受阈值ΔE = 2.25。FMLB和NXT的VHN分别为9.1±0.4和15.5±0.4,且不受人工刷牙的影响。3D打印材料的弯曲强度对于FMLB和NXT分别为139.4±40.5MPa和163.9±14.0MPa,与聚碳酸酯和PMMA组的弯曲强度相似(分别为155.2±23.6MPa和108.0±8.1MPa)。本研究发现,所评估的3D打印材料具有与CAD/CAM材料相当的机械和光学性能,即使在人工刷牙和水热老化后也很稳定。