Suppr超能文献

跑步中计算和确定的无氧乳酸阈的比较和性能验证。

Comparison and Performance Validation of Calculated and Established Anaerobic Lactate Thresholds in Running.

机构信息

The German Research Centre of Elite Sport, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany.

Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Institute of Sport Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60487 Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Oct 16;57(10):1117. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101117.

Abstract

: This study aimed to compare the calculated running velocity at the anaerobic lactate threshold (cLT), determined by a mathematical model for metabolic simulation, with two established threshold concepts (onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA; 4 mmol∙L) and modified maximal deviation method (mDmax)). Additionally, all threshold concepts were correlated with performance in different endurance running events. : Ten sub-elite runners performed a 30 s sprint test on a cycle ergometer adjusted to an isokinetic mode set to a cadence of 120 rpm to determine maximal lactate production rate (VLa), and a graded exercise test on a treadmill to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO). Running velocities at OBLA, mDmax, and cLT were then compared with each other, and further correlated with running performance over various distances (3000 m, 5000 m, and 10,000 m). : The mean difference in cLT was -0.13 ± 0.43 m∙s and -0.32 ± 0.39 m∙s compared to mDmax ( = 0.49) and OBLA ( < 0.01), respectively. cLT indicated moderate to good concordance with the established threshold concepts (mDmax: ICC = 0.87, OBLA: ICC = 0.74). In comparison with other threshold concepts, cLT exhibited comparable correlations with the assessed running performances (cLT: = 0.61-0.76, mDmax: = 0.69-0.79, OBLA: = 0.56-0.69). : Our data show that cLT can be applied for determining endurance performance during running. Due to the consideration of individual physiological profiles, cLT offers a physiologically justified approach to assess an athlete's endurance performance.

摘要

: 本研究旨在比较通过代谢模拟数学模型计算得出的无氧乳酸阈下(cLT)跑步速度与两种已建立的阈值概念(血乳酸积累起始点(OBLA;4mmol·L)和改良最大偏差法(mDmax))。此外,所有阈值概念都与不同耐力跑步项目的表现相关联。 : 10 名次精英跑步者在自行车测力计上进行 30 秒冲刺测试,调整为等速模式,设定转速为 120rpm,以确定最大乳酸生成率(VLa),并在跑步机上进行递增负荷运动测试,以确定最大摄氧量(VO)。然后将 OBLA、mDmax 和 cLT 的跑步速度进行比较,并进一步与各种距离(3000 米、5000 米和 10000 米)的跑步表现相关联。 : cLT 与 mDmax( = 0.49)和 OBLA( < 0.01)相比,平均差值分别为-0.13 ± 0.43 m·s 和-0.32 ± 0.39 m·s。cLT 与已建立的阈值概念具有中度至良好的一致性(mDmax:ICC = 0.87,OBLA:ICC = 0.74)。与其他阈值概念相比,cLT 与评估的跑步表现具有相当的相关性(cLT: = 0.61-0.76,mDmax: = 0.69-0.79,OBLA: = 0.56-0.69)。 : 我们的数据表明,cLT 可用于确定跑步过程中的耐力表现。由于考虑到个体的生理特征,cLT 为评估运动员的耐力表现提供了一种生理上合理的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/748e/8541599/268049dd8cf1/medicina-57-01117-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验