Suppr超能文献

气候变化研究与解决方案探寻:重新思考跨学科性

Climate change research and the search for solutions: rethinking interdisciplinarity.

作者信息

Schipper E Lisa F, Dubash Navroz K, Mulugetta Yacob

机构信息

Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY UK.

Centre for Policy Research, Dharma Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi 110 021 India.

出版信息

Clim Change. 2021;168(3-4):18. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03237-3. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

Abstract

Growing political pressure to find solutions to climate change is leading to increasing calls for multiple disciplines, in particular those that are not traditionally part of climate change research, to contribute new knowledge systems that can offer deeper and broader insights to address the problem. Recognition of the complexity of climate change compels researchers to draw on interdisciplinary knowledge that marries natural sciences with social sciences and humanities. Yet most interdisciplinary approaches fail to adequately merge the framings of the disparate disciplines, resulting in reductionist messages that are largely devoid of context, and hence provide incomplete and misleading analysis for decision-making. For different knowledge systems to work better together toward climate solutions, we need to reframe the way questions are asked and research pursued, in order to inform action without slipping into reductionism. We suggest that interdisciplinarity needs to be rethought. This will require accepting a plurality of narratives, embracing multiple disciplinary perspectives, and shifting expectations of public messaging, and above all looking to integrate the appropriate disciplines that can help understand human systems in order to better mediate action.

摘要

寻求气候变化解决方案所面临的政治压力日益增大,这导致越来越多的人呼吁多学科参与,特别是那些传统上不属于气候变化研究范畴的学科,以贡献新的知识体系,从而为解决这一问题提供更深入、更广泛的见解。认识到气候变化的复杂性迫使研究人员借鉴跨学科知识,将自然科学与社会科学和人文学科结合起来。然而,大多数跨学科方法未能充分融合不同学科的框架,导致信息简化,在很大程度上缺乏背景,因此为决策提供了不完整且具误导性的分析。为了让不同的知识体系更好地共同致力于气候解决方案,我们需要重新构建提出问题和开展研究的方式,以便为行动提供信息而不陷入简化论。我们认为跨学科性需要重新思考。这将需要接受多元的叙述方式,接纳多种学科视角,改变对公众信息传播的期望,最重要的是寻求整合能够帮助理解人类系统的适当学科,以便更好地协调行动。

相似文献

2
Ambiguity: A new way of thinking about responses to climate change.歧义:气候变化应对新思路。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 15;571:1271-4. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.162. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
9
Identifying the challenges of interdisciplinary research on pornography use.识别色情使用的跨学科研究的挑战。
Cult Health Sex. 2020 May;22(5):599-613. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1617898. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

3
Ten new insights in climate science 2024.2024年气候科学的十大新见解。
One Earth. 2025 Jun 20;8(6):None. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101285.
9
Small is beautiful: climate-change science as if people mattered.小即美:以人为本的气候变化科学。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 2;1(1):pgac009. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac009. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

3
Global problems need social science.全球性问题需要社会科学。
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7790):295. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00064-x.
5
Towards legitimacy of the solar geoengineering research enterprise.迈向太阳能地球工程研究事业的合法性。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 May 13;376(2119). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0459.
8
Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs.全球变化研究计划中自然科学和社会科学相互作用的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3665-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107484110. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验