• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国射频消融与腹腔镜肝切除治疗肝细胞癌的疗效:一项综合荟萃分析。

Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Zhijun, Yu Qiong, Lu Xiaozheng, Liu Yahui, Ji Bai

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep;16(3):455-471. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105377. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2021.105377
PMID:34691297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8512513/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been the second leading cause of cancer-related death in China. Radiofrequency ablation is a relatively novel treatment that may improve the treatment of HCC.

AIM

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the treatment of HCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched for relevant published studies in English (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE) and in Chinese (CBM, CNKI and Wanfang) from their inception until September 23, 2019. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 19 retrospective studies including 2038 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that LLR was superior to RFA in terms of 3-year overall survival rate (OR = 0.62), 1 to 3-year disease-free survival rates (OR = 0.57; OR = 0.41, respectively) and local recurrence rates (OR = 2.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis demonstrates that laparoscopic liver resection should be preferred in tumors of size 3-5 cm, while for < 3 cm the long term results are equal.

摘要

引言

肝细胞癌(HCC)一直是中国癌症相关死亡的第二大主要原因。射频消融是一种相对新颖的治疗方法,可能会改善HCC的治疗效果。

目的

评估并比较射频消融(RFA)与腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)治疗HCC的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

我们检索了英文(PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE)和中文(CBM、CNKI和万方)从创刊至2019年9月23日发表的相关研究。纳入研究的质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。

结果

共有19项回顾性研究(包括2038例患者)符合荟萃分析的条件。荟萃分析结果表明,在3年总生存率(OR = 0.62)、1至3年无病生存率(分别为OR = 0.57;OR = 0.41)和局部复发率(OR = 2.71)方面,LLR优于RFA。

结论

荟萃分析表明,对于3 - 5厘米大小的肿瘤,应首选腹腔镜肝切除术,而对于小于3厘米的肿瘤,长期效果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/aaaa664a093a/WIITM-16-43859-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/ac53ce645877/WIITM-16-43859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/10c4b32d1b7f/WIITM-16-43859-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/ffbb098b5266/WIITM-16-43859-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/1d4f38def435/WIITM-16-43859-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/aba1e61246e2/WIITM-16-43859-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/326c84ff1b05/WIITM-16-43859-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/9c26e84318ce/WIITM-16-43859-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/aaaa664a093a/WIITM-16-43859-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/ac53ce645877/WIITM-16-43859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/10c4b32d1b7f/WIITM-16-43859-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/ffbb098b5266/WIITM-16-43859-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/1d4f38def435/WIITM-16-43859-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/aba1e61246e2/WIITM-16-43859-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/326c84ff1b05/WIITM-16-43859-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/9c26e84318ce/WIITM-16-43859-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/700d/8512513/aaaa664a093a/WIITM-16-43859-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a comprehensive meta-analysis.中国射频消融与腹腔镜肝切除治疗肝细胞癌的疗效:一项综合荟萃分析。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep;16(3):455-471. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105377. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with early and small hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies.腹腔镜肝切除术与射频消融术治疗早期小肝癌的疗效和安全性:一项观察性研究的更新荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 7;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03292-3.
3
Pure laparoscopic liver resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score and multivariate analysis.单纯腹腔镜肝切除术与经皮射频消融术治疗小肝细胞癌的倾向评分及多因素分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Jan;11(1):43-51. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1045.
4
Comparative Study of Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Single Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Located in Left Lateral Segments of the Liver.腹腔镜肝切除术与射频消融治疗位于肝脏左外叶的单个小肝细胞癌的长期疗效比较研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 1;59(6):1063. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061063.
5
Laparoscopic Liver Resection versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Single Nodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Treatment Outcomes.腹腔镜肝切除术与经皮射频消融术治疗小的单结节肝细胞癌:治疗结果比较
Liver Cancer. 2021 Feb;10(1):25-37. doi: 10.1159/000510909. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.射频消融术与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 12;18(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01966-w.
7
Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝切除术与射频消融治疗复发性肝细胞癌的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):875-886. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1933218.
8
Laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for caudate lobe solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study.腹腔镜肝切除术与射频消融术治疗尾状叶单发肝细胞癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Feb;13(4):e7068. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7068.
9
Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: a meta-analysis.肝内肝细胞癌复发的射频消融与手术切除:一项荟萃分析
J Surg Res. 2015 May 1;195(1):166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.042. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus minimally invasive liver surgery for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.射频消融与微创肝切除术治疗小肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2419-2429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06784-0. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Survey of Clinical Practices for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Experts at Tertiary Hospitals in China From 2020 to 2021.2020年至2021年中国三级医院专家对肝细胞癌临床实践的调查
Cancer Innov. 2025 Apr 7;4(3):e70006. doi: 10.1002/cai2.70006. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Exploring unmet healthcare needs and associated inequalities among middle-aged and older adults in Eastern China during the progression toward universal health coverage.在中国东部地区向全民健康覆盖迈进的过程中,探索中年及老年人群未满足的医疗保健需求及相关不平等问题。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 27;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00521-7.
3
Laparoscopic liver resection is superior to radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Early experience with laparoscopic treatment of liver tumors using a separable cluster electrode with a no-touch technique.使用可分离簇状电极及非接触技术进行腹腔镜治疗肝肿瘤的早期经验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):76-82. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.95065. Epub 2020 May 10.
2
Traditional Chinese medicine as supportive care for the management of liver cancer: Past, present, and future.中医作为肝癌管理的支持性护理:过去、现在和未来。
Genes Dis. 2019 Nov 2;7(3):370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2019.10.016. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
腹腔镜肝切除术优于射频消融治疗小肝细胞癌:倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Jun;18(3):998-1010. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10645-x. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
4
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with early and small hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies.腹腔镜肝切除术与射频消融术治疗早期小肝癌的疗效和安全性:一项观察性研究的更新荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 7;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03292-3.
5
Transarterial chemoembolization with insertion of radioactive seeds for hepatocellular carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞联合放射性粒子植入治疗肝细胞癌。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Dec;18(4):645-654. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.131539. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
Minimizing blood loss and transfusion rate in laparoscopic liver surgery: a review.腹腔镜肝手术中减少失血和输血率:综述
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):213-223. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.124088. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Repeat resection versus percutaneous ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.复发性肝细胞癌的重复切除与经皮消融治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Mar;18(1):1-10. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.119774. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
8
Percutaneous ablation for adrenal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮消融治疗肾上腺转移瘤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Dec;17(4):549-560. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.119585. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters in the prognosis prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma after thermal ablation: a retrospective cohort study.超声造影定量参数在热消融术后肝细胞癌预后预测中的价值:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Oct;13(5):2522-2531. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-919.
腹腔镜肝切除术与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jun 24;11:5711-5724. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S189777. eCollection 2019.
4
Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus minimally invasive liver surgery for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.射频消融与微创肝切除术治疗小肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2419-2429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06784-0. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Laparoscopic Hepatectomy (with or without Robotic Assistance) versus Radiofrequency Ablation as a Minimally Invasive Treatment for Very Early-Stage or Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.腹腔镜肝切除术(有或无机器人辅助)与射频消融作为极早期或早期肝细胞癌的微创治疗方法的比较。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(1):65-71. doi: 10.1159/000497112. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌患者的短期和长期疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 May;29(5):643-654. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0588. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
[Report of cancer epidemiology in China, 2015].《2015年中国癌症流行病学报告》
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 23;41(1):19-28. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2019.01.005.
8
Histological architectural classification determines recurrence pattern and prognosis after curative hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.组织学结构分类决定了肝癌患者根治性肝切除术后的复发模式和预后。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 14;13(9):e0203856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203856. eCollection 2018.
9
Comparative efficacy and safety between ablative therapies or surgery for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.消融治疗与手术治疗小肝癌的疗效和安全性比较:网状荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;12(9):935-945. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1503531. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 157 patients: A case controlled study with propensity score matching at two Chinese centres.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗 157 例肝细胞癌的病例对照研究:在中国两家中心采用倾向评分匹配的方法
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 20.