• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习可利用《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)数据对互联网医疗中的法律风险进行评估。

Machine learning enables legal risk assessment in internet healthcare using HIPAA data.

作者信息

Liu Shixian, Liu Hailing, Fan Siyu, Song Leming, Wang Zeyu

机构信息

School of Law, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, 511363, China.

Law School, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13720-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-13720-x
PMID:40760025
Abstract

This study explores how artificial intelligence technologies can enhance the regulatory capacity for legal risks in internet healthcare based on a machine learning (ML) analytical framework and utilizes data from the health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA) database. The research methods include data collection and processing, construction and optimization of ML models, and the application of a risk assessment framework. Firstly, the data are sourced from the HIPAA database, encompassing various data types, such as medical records, patient personal information, and treatment costs. Secondly, to address missing values and noise in the data, preprocessing methods such as denoising, normalization, and feature extraction are employed to ensure data quality and model accuracy. Finally, in the selection of ML models, this study experiments with several common algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and deep neural network (DNN). Each algorithm has its strengths and limitations depending on the specific legal risk assessment task. RF enhances classification performance by integrating multiple decision trees, while SVM achieves efficient classification by identifying the maximum margin hyperplane. DNN demonstrates strong capabilities in handling complex nonlinear relationships, and XGBoost further improves classification accuracy by optimizing decision tree models through gradient boosting. Model performance is evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, and area under curve (AUC) value. The experimental results indicate that the DNN model performs excellently in terms of F1 score, accuracy, and recall, showcasing its efficiency and stability in legal risk assessment. The principal component analysis-random forest (PCA+RF) and RF models also exhibit stable performance, making them suitable for various application scenarios. In contrast, the SVM and K-Nearest Neighbor models perform relatively weaker, although they still retain some validity in certain contexts, their overall performance is inferior to deep learning and ensemble learning methods. This study not only provides effective ML tools for legal risk assessment in internet healthcare but also offers theoretical support and practical guidance for future research in this field.

摘要

本研究基于机器学习(ML)分析框架,探讨人工智能技术如何增强互联网医疗中法律风险的监管能力,并利用来自《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)数据库的数据。研究方法包括数据收集与处理、ML模型的构建与优化以及风险评估框架的应用。首先,数据来源于HIPAA数据库,涵盖各种数据类型,如医疗记录、患者个人信息和治疗费用。其次,为解决数据中的缺失值和噪声问题,采用去噪、归一化和特征提取等预处理方法,以确保数据质量和模型准确性。最后,在ML模型的选择上,本研究对几种常见算法进行了实验,包括极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和深度神经网络(DNN)。每种算法根据具体的法律风险评估任务都有其优势和局限性。RF通过集成多个决策树来提高分类性能,而SVM通过识别最大间隔超平面实现高效分类。DNN在处理复杂非线性关系方面表现出强大能力,XGBoost则通过梯度提升优化决策树模型进一步提高分类准确性。使用准确率、召回率、精确率、F1分数和曲线下面积(AUC)值等指标评估模型性能。实验结果表明,DNN模型在F1分数、准确率和召回率方面表现出色,展示了其在法律风险评估中的效率和稳定性。主成分分析-随机森林(PCA+RF)和RF模型也表现出稳定的性能,使其适用于各种应用场景。相比之下,SVM和K近邻模型的性能相对较弱,尽管它们在某些情况下仍具有一定的有效性,但其整体性能不如深度学习和集成学习方法。本研究不仅为互联网医疗中的法律风险评估提供了有效的ML工具,还为该领域未来的研究提供了理论支持和实践指导。

相似文献

1
Machine learning enables legal risk assessment in internet healthcare using HIPAA data.机器学习可利用《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)数据对互联网医疗中的法律风险进行评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13720-x.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
Proposal for Using AI to Assess Clinical Data Integrity and Generate Metadata: Algorithm Development and Validation.关于使用人工智能评估临床数据完整性并生成元数据的提案:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 30;13:e60204. doi: 10.2196/60204.
5
Effectiveness of machine learning models in diagnosis of heart disease: a comparative study.机器学习模型在心脏病诊断中的有效性:一项比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09423-y.
6
Development of an interpretable machine learning model for frailty risk prediction in older adult care institutions: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study in China.老年护理机构衰弱风险预测的可解释机器学习模型的开发:中国的一项混合方法横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 5;15(7):e095460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095460.
7
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Development and Validation Using Insights From a Japanese Population-Based Study.预测冠心病风险的机器学习模型:基于日本人群研究的见解进行开发与验证
JMIR Cardio. 2025 May 12;9:e68066. doi: 10.2196/68066.
8
Construction and validation of HBV-ACLF bacterial infection diagnosis model based on machine learning.基于机器学习的HBV-ACLF细菌感染诊断模型的构建与验证
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11199-5.
9
Machine learning models predict triage levels, massive transfusion protocol activation, and mortality in trauma utilizing patients hemodynamics on admission.机器学习模型利用创伤患者入院时的血流动力学来预测分诊级别、大量输血方案的激活和死亡率。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Sep;179:108880. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108880. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
10
Stabilizing machine learning for reproducible and explainable results: A novel validation approach to subject-specific insights.稳定机器学习以获得可重复和可解释的结果:一种针对特定个体见解的新型验证方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Jun 21;269:108899. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108899.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel decision support system for proactive risk management in healthcare based on fuzzy inference, neural network and support vector machine.一种基于模糊推理、神经网络和支持向量机的医疗保健主动风险管理新型决策支持系统。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jun;186:105442. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105442. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
2
FDA-cleared artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices and their 510(k) predicate networks.FDA 批准的人工智能和基于机器学习的医疗器械及其 510(k) 前序网络。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Sep;5(9):e618-e626. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00126-7.
3
Machine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection.
用于医学图像分析的机器学习和深度学习方法:从诊断到检测
Multimed Tools Appl. 2022 Dec 24:1-39. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-14305-w.
4
A Catalogue of Machine Learning Algorithms for Healthcare Risk Predictions.医疗保健风险预测的机器学习算法目录。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;22(22):8615. doi: 10.3390/s22228615.
5
Fall risk assessment through a synergistic multi-source DNN learning model.通过协同多源 DNN 学习模型进行跌倒风险评估。
Artif Intell Med. 2022 May;127:102280. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102280. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
6
Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices.算法变更协议在自适应机器学习医疗器械的监管中。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 26;23(10):e30545. doi: 10.2196/30545.
7
Ethical and Legal Implications of Remote Monitoring of Medical Devices.医疗器械远程监测的伦理和法律问题
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1257-1289. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12481. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Introduction to machine and deep learning for medical physicists.医学物理学家的机器学习和深度学习入门。
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(5):e127-e147. doi: 10.1002/mp.14140.
9
The need for a system view to regulate artificial intelligence/machine learning-based software as medical device.需要一种系统观点来将基于人工智能/机器学习的软件作为医疗设备进行监管。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Apr 7;3:53. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0262-2. eCollection 2020.