Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
In Vivo. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):3019-3029. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12597.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the earliest recognized complications of regional anesthesia after inadvertent dural puncture. Epidural blood patch (EBP) is the "gold standard" for the treatment of PDPH. Several alternatives have been suggested as peripheral nerve blocks. The aim of this systematic review was to find out the potential efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve blocks for the treatment of PDPH.
The main databases were systematically searched in September 2020 for studies examining regional anesthesia and PDPH.
Nineteen studies were identified, including a total of 221 patients. Sphenopalatine ganglion block, greater occipital nerve block, and lesser occipital nerve block were performed. All participants reported a numeric rating scale (NRS) <4 after peripheral nerve blocks at 1, 24 and 48 h. Only patients with PDPH after diagnostic lumbar puncture reported NRS ≥4 after 48 h. No major adverse events were reported. Approximately, 17% of patients underwent a second or more peripheral nerve blocks. In 30 participants, EBP was required.
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the use of peripheral nerve blocks to treat PDPH. Peripheral nerve blocks can be considered as analgesic options in the management of PDPH.
背景/目的:硬脊膜穿破后头痛(PDPH)是意外硬脊膜穿破后区域麻醉最早被识别的并发症之一。硬膜外血贴(EBP)是治疗 PDPH 的“金标准”。已经提出了几种替代方法作为外周神经阻滞。本系统评价的目的是找出外周神经阻滞治疗 PDPH 的潜在疗效和安全性。
2020 年 9 月,系统地在主要数据库中搜索了检查区域麻醉和 PDPH 的研究。
确定了 19 项研究,共纳入 221 名患者。进行了蝶腭神经节阻滞、枕大神经阻滞和枕小神经阻滞。所有参与者在 1、24 和 48 小时外周神经阻滞后报告数字评分量表(NRS)<4。只有在诊断性腰椎穿刺后发生 PDPH 的患者在 48 小时后报告 NRS≥4。未报告重大不良事件。大约 17%的患者接受了第二次或更多次外周神经阻滞。在 30 名参与者中,需要进行 EBP。
据我们所知,这是首次关于使用外周神经阻滞治疗 PDPH 的系统评价。外周神经阻滞可被视为 PDPH 管理中镇痛的选择。