Suppr超能文献

非门控增强胸部 CT 对冠状动脉阻塞和心肌灌注缺损的诊断准确性预测急性心肌梗死。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Artery Occlusion and Myocardial Perfusion Defect on Non-Gated Enhanced Chest CT in Predicting Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, CHA University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam 13497, Korea.

Department of Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Tomography. 2021 Sep 27;7(4):504-512. doi: 10.3390/tomography7040043.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery occlusion (CAO) and myocardial perfusion defect (MPD) identified on non-gated enhanced chest CT in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We retrospectively assessed 99 patients with AMI (group 1, = 33) and without AMI (group 2, = 66) who underwent non-gated chest CT. We analyzed the presence of MPD and CAO on non-gated chest CT. MPD on the CT was categorized using a three-point scale (0 = no definite MPD; 1 = probable artifact or questionable MPD; 2 = probable MPD). Presence of CAO was defined as an abrupt change of contrast enhancement in a coronary artery segment with no or minimal coronary motion on the CT. There were 42.4% and 12.1% patients with probable MPD ( = 0.002), and 18.2% and 0% patients with CAO ( = 0.001) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Probable MPD alone and simultaneous presence of CAO and probable MPD to predict AMI resulted in sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive valve of 42.4%, 87.9%, 75.3%, and 63.6%, respectively, and 12.1%, 100%, 69.5%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, probable MPD alone on non-gated chest CT demonstrated a relatively low sensitivity, high specificity, and modest positive predictive value for the prediction of AMI on non-gated enhanced chest CT. Although it is rare, simultaneous presence of CAO and probable MPD had a high positive predictive value to predict AMI on non-gated enhanced chest CT.

摘要

本研究旨在评估非门控增强胸部 CT 诊断急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者冠状动脉闭塞(CAO)和心肌灌注缺损(MPD)的准确性。我们回顾性评估了 99 例 AMI 患者(组 1,n = 33)和非 AMI 患者(组 2,n = 66),这些患者均接受了非门控胸部 CT 检查。我们分析了非门控胸部 CT 上 MPD 和 CAO 的存在情况。CT 上的 MPD 采用三点量表进行分类(0 = 无明确 MPD;1 = 可能为伪影或可疑 MPD;2 = 可能 MPD)。CAO 的存在定义为 CT 上冠状动脉节段的对比增强突然变化,而冠状动脉运动无或最小。组 1 和组 2 中分别有 42.4%和 12.1%的患者有可疑 MPD(P < 0.002),18.2%和 0%的患者有 CAO(P < 0.001)。单独可疑 MPD 以及同时存在 CAO 和可疑 MPD 预测 AMI 的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为 42.4%、87.9%、75.3%和 63.6%,以及 12.1%、100%、69.5%和 100%。总之,非门控胸部 CT 上的可疑 MPD 单独预测非门控增强胸部 CT 上 AMI 的敏感性较低,特异性较高,阳性预测值中等。尽管很少见,但 CAO 和可疑 MPD 同时存在时,对预测非门控增强胸部 CT 上 AMI 具有很高的阳性预测值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/099a/8544712/102e4d69a6f1/tomography-07-00043-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验