Department of Radiology, CHA University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam 13497, Korea.
Department of Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 20742, USA.
Tomography. 2021 Sep 27;7(4):504-512. doi: 10.3390/tomography7040043.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery occlusion (CAO) and myocardial perfusion defect (MPD) identified on non-gated enhanced chest CT in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We retrospectively assessed 99 patients with AMI (group 1, = 33) and without AMI (group 2, = 66) who underwent non-gated chest CT. We analyzed the presence of MPD and CAO on non-gated chest CT. MPD on the CT was categorized using a three-point scale (0 = no definite MPD; 1 = probable artifact or questionable MPD; 2 = probable MPD). Presence of CAO was defined as an abrupt change of contrast enhancement in a coronary artery segment with no or minimal coronary motion on the CT. There were 42.4% and 12.1% patients with probable MPD ( = 0.002), and 18.2% and 0% patients with CAO ( = 0.001) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Probable MPD alone and simultaneous presence of CAO and probable MPD to predict AMI resulted in sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive valve of 42.4%, 87.9%, 75.3%, and 63.6%, respectively, and 12.1%, 100%, 69.5%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, probable MPD alone on non-gated chest CT demonstrated a relatively low sensitivity, high specificity, and modest positive predictive value for the prediction of AMI on non-gated enhanced chest CT. Although it is rare, simultaneous presence of CAO and probable MPD had a high positive predictive value to predict AMI on non-gated enhanced chest CT.
本研究旨在评估非门控增强胸部 CT 诊断急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者冠状动脉闭塞(CAO)和心肌灌注缺损(MPD)的准确性。我们回顾性评估了 99 例 AMI 患者(组 1,n = 33)和非 AMI 患者(组 2,n = 66),这些患者均接受了非门控胸部 CT 检查。我们分析了非门控胸部 CT 上 MPD 和 CAO 的存在情况。CT 上的 MPD 采用三点量表进行分类(0 = 无明确 MPD;1 = 可能为伪影或可疑 MPD;2 = 可能 MPD)。CAO 的存在定义为 CT 上冠状动脉节段的对比增强突然变化,而冠状动脉运动无或最小。组 1 和组 2 中分别有 42.4%和 12.1%的患者有可疑 MPD(P < 0.002),18.2%和 0%的患者有 CAO(P < 0.001)。单独可疑 MPD 以及同时存在 CAO 和可疑 MPD 预测 AMI 的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为 42.4%、87.9%、75.3%和 63.6%,以及 12.1%、100%、69.5%和 100%。总之,非门控胸部 CT 上的可疑 MPD 单独预测非门控增强胸部 CT 上 AMI 的敏感性较低,特异性较高,阳性预测值中等。尽管很少见,但 CAO 和可疑 MPD 同时存在时,对预测非门控增强胸部 CT 上 AMI 具有很高的阳性预测值。