Bowman Savannah, Agarwal Sandeep K, Ferguson Keshia C, Maliekel Maryjo J, Lopez-Olivo Maria A, Suarez-Almazor Maria E, Danila Maria I, Yazdany Jinoos, Bruera Sebastian
Section of Immunology, Allergy, and Rheumatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Health Serv. 2025 May 22;5:1503881. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1503881. eCollection 2025.
There is scarce knowledge on the benefits, limitations, and acceptance of telemedicine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly in those from under-resourced groups. We aimed to assess the experiences and views on telemedicine of people with SLE, clinicians, and nursing staff from a safety net healthcare system in Harris County, Texas, defined as a hospital network that primarily serves low-income, uninsured, and vulnerable populations.
We conducted semi-structured 1:1 in-person interviews of patients with SLE and their clinical team members, in Harris County, Texas. Using Levesque's conceptual framework for healthcare access, semi-structured interviews and content analysis were used to explore benefits and limitations of telemedicine in under-resourced patients with SLE. Interview content was coded using inductive and deductive approaches. Data collected proceeded until thematic saturation was reached. Themes and subthemes were identified and visualized.
Fourteen interviews were conducted. The participants included six patients with SLE, three rheumatologists, two nurses, two medical assistants, and one rheumatology fellow. All participants had previously participated in telemedicine visits. One hundred and fifty-one codes were identified. Five key themes emerged from the analysis, including: (1) Access and Convenience, (2) Technological and Linguistic Barriers, (3) Economic Considerations, (4) Quality of Care and Disease Outcomes, and (5) Implementation of Telemedicine. Analysis showed that telemedicine could improve access to care and adherence to clinic visits by reducing the barriers associated with socioeconomic factors. On the other hand, barriers to telemedicine included digital literacy, concern about negative impact on physician-patient relationship, and language discordance.
There is an opportunity to improve access to care in patients with SLE, particularly from under-resourced backgrounds, by leveraging the benefits of telemedicine with respect to access to care, while addressing the barriers to successful implementation.
关于系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者远程医疗的益处、局限性及接受度的知识稀缺,尤其是资源匮乏群体中的患者。我们旨在评估得克萨斯州哈里斯县一个安全网医疗系统中SLE患者、临床医生和护理人员对远程医疗的体验和看法,该系统是一个主要服务低收入、未参保及弱势群体的医院网络。
我们在得克萨斯州哈里斯县对SLE患者及其临床团队成员进行了一对一的半结构化面对面访谈。使用勒维克的医疗保健可及性概念框架,通过半结构化访谈和内容分析来探讨远程医疗在资源匮乏的SLE患者中的益处和局限性。访谈内容采用归纳和演绎方法进行编码。持续收集数据直至达到主题饱和。确定并直观呈现主题和子主题。
进行了14次访谈。参与者包括6名SLE患者、3名风湿病学家、2名护士、2名医疗助理和1名风湿病学研究员。所有参与者此前都参加过远程医疗就诊。共识别出151个编码。分析得出五个关键主题,包括:(1)可及性与便利性;(2)技术和语言障碍;(3)经济考量;(4)医疗质量和疾病转归;(5)远程医疗的实施。分析表明,远程医疗可通过减少与社会经济因素相关的障碍来改善医疗可及性和就诊依从性。另一方面,远程医疗的障碍包括数字素养、对医患关系负面影响的担忧以及语言不匹配。
通过利用远程医疗在医疗可及性方面的益处,同时解决成功实施的障碍,有机会改善SLE患者,尤其是资源匮乏背景患者的医疗可及性。