FutureNeuro SFI Research Centre, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland; Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
FutureNeuro SFI Research Centre, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Feb;115:107675. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107675. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
As part of our ongoing interest in patient- and family-centered care in epilepsy, we began, before the onset of the CoVID-19 pandemic, to evaluate the concerns and preferences of those delivering and receiving care via telemedicine. CoVID-19 arrived and acted as an unexpected experiment in nature, catalyzing telemedicine's widespread implementation across many disciplines of medicine. The arrival of CoVID-19 in Ireland gave us the opportunity to record these perceptions pre- and post-CoVID. Data were extracted from the National Epilepsy Electronic Patient Record (EEPR). Power BI Analytics collated data from two epilepsy centers in Dublin. Analysis of data on reasons for using the telephone support line was conducted. A subset of patients and clinicians who attended virtual encounters over both periods were asked for their perception of telemedicine care through a mixed methods survey. Between 23rd December 2019 and 23rd March 2020 (pre-CoVID era), a total of 1180 patients were seen in 1653 clinical encounters. As part of a telemedicine pilot study, 50 of these encounters were scheduled virtual telephone appointments. Twenty eight surveys were completed by clinicians and 18 by patients during that period. From 24th March 2020 to 24th June 2020, 1164 patients were seen in 1693 encounters of which 729 (63%) patients were seen in 748 scheduled virtual encounters. 118 clinician impressions were captured through an online survey and 75 patients or carers completed a telephone survey during the post-CoVID era. There was no backlog of appointments or loss of care continuity forced by the pandemic. Clinicians expressed strong levels of satisfaction, but some doubted the suitability of new patients to the service or candidates for surgery receiving care via telemedicine. Patients reported positive experiences surrounding telephone appointments comparing them favorably to face-to-face encounters. The availability of a shared EEPR demonstrated no loss of care contact for patients with epilepsy. The survey showed that telemedicine is seen as an effective and satisfactory method of delivering chronic outpatient care.
作为我们对癫痫患者和家庭为中心的护理持续关注的一部分,我们在 COVID-19 大流行之前开始评估通过远程医疗提供和接受护理的人的关注点和偏好。COVID-19 来了,它在自然界中充当了一个意外的实验,促使远程医疗在许多医学领域得到广泛实施。COVID-19 在爱尔兰的到来为我们提供了在 COVID-19 之前和之后记录这些看法的机会。数据从国家癫痫电子患者记录 (EEPR) 中提取。Power BI Analytics 从都柏林的两个癫痫中心整理数据。对使用电话支持热线的原因进行了数据分析。在这两个时期都参加了虚拟会议的一部分患者和临床医生通过混合方法调查被要求对远程医疗护理的看法。在 2019 年 12 月 23 日至 2020 年 3 月 23 日(COVID-19 之前)期间,共有 1180 名患者在 1653 次临床就诊中接受了治疗。作为远程医疗试点研究的一部分,其中 50 次就诊被安排为虚拟电话预约。在此期间,有 28 名临床医生和 18 名患者完成了调查。从 2020 年 3 月 24 日至 2020 年 6 月 24 日,共有 1164 名患者在 1693 次就诊中接受了治疗,其中 729 名(63%)患者在 748 次预约的虚拟就诊中接受了治疗。在 COVID-19 之后,通过在线调查获得了 118 名临床医生的印象,并且有 75 名患者或照顾者通过电话调查完成了调查。大流行并没有造成预约积压或护理连续性的丧失。临床医生表示非常满意,但有些人怀疑新患者是否适合该服务或手术候选人是否通过远程医疗接受护理。患者报告说,在电话预约方面的体验积极,将其与面对面的就诊进行了比较。共享的 EEPR 的可用性证明癫痫患者的护理接触没有丢失。调查显示,远程医疗被视为提供慢性门诊护理的有效和令人满意的方法。