• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经前臂入路行影像学引导下端口植入的风险因素评估。

Risk factors assessment for radiographically guided port implantations with forearm access.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, University hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 26;16(10):e0259127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259127. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0259127
PMID:34699565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8547706/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Port implantations at the forearm are associated with an increased risk of relevant vein thrombosis. Therefore, with this study we sought to identify the responsible risk factors to improve technical quality of the method.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 313 patients with port implantation at the forearm in 2019. Then, exploratory statistics were conducted comprising Cox-Regression and Kaplan-Meier-Analyses.

RESULTS

Mean age was 60 ± 14 years. 232 (74%) of the patients were female. No early infection was observed. 29 late infections and 57 cases of thrombosis occurred. In only 9% of the patients with thrombosis hospital admission was necessary for treatment. Median interval to the diagnosis of thrombosis was 23 days; inter-quartile-range: 16-75. Mean interval to elective port explantation was 227 ± 128 days. There was no effect of occurrence of thrombosis of the interventionalist, the assistance nor of several technical aspects. However, there was a significantly lower risk of thrombosis for primary implanted port system compared to replacement ports, Hazard-ratio: 0.34 [Confidence interval: 0.172, 0.674], p = 0.002. Age was a significant risk factor for late infections, Hazard-ratio: 3.35 [Confidence interval:1.84, 6.07], p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

The main risk factor for adverse outcome after radiographically guided port implantation at the forearm is the type of the implanted port system. The reason for that might not be the material itself but the experience of a team with a certain port system. Age is a risk factor for late complications.

摘要

介绍

在前臂植入端口会增加相关静脉血栓形成的风险。因此,本研究旨在确定相关风险因素,以提高该方法的技术质量。

方法

这是对 2019 年在前臂植入 313 例端口的患者进行的回顾性分析。然后进行了探索性统计分析,包括 Cox 回归和 Kaplan-Meier 分析。

结果

平均年龄为 60 ± 14 岁。232 例(74%)患者为女性。未观察到早期感染。发生了 29 例晚期感染和 57 例血栓形成。只有 9%的血栓形成患者需要住院治疗。诊断血栓形成的中位间隔时间为 23 天;四分位间距:16-75。择期取出端口的平均间隔时间为 227 ± 128 天。血栓形成的发生与介入医生、助手或多个技术方面无关。然而,与更换端口相比,原发性植入端口系统发生血栓的风险显著降低,风险比:0.34[置信区间:0.172,0.674],p = 0.002。年龄是晚期感染的一个显著危险因素,风险比:3.35[置信区间:1.84,6.07],p < 0.0001。

结论

经影像学引导在前臂植入端口后不良结果的主要危险因素是植入端口系统的类型。原因可能不是材料本身,而是团队使用特定端口系统的经验。年龄是晚期并发症的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4883/8547706/ef1074abc481/pone.0259127.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4883/8547706/624f3a1eb1e4/pone.0259127.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4883/8547706/ef1074abc481/pone.0259127.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4883/8547706/624f3a1eb1e4/pone.0259127.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4883/8547706/ef1074abc481/pone.0259127.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors assessment for radiographically guided port implantations with forearm access.经前臂入路行影像学引导下端口植入的风险因素评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 26;16(10):e0259127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259127. eCollection 2021.
2
Identification of risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in patients with totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm.前臂完全植入式静脉通路端口患者导管相关血栓形成的危险因素识别
J Vasc Access. 2012 Jan-Mar;13(1):79-85. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000003.
3
Risk factors for unsuccessful removal of central venous access ports implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients.成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入的中心静脉置管取出失败的风险因素。
Jpn J Radiol. 2022 Apr;40(4):412-418. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01214-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.用于前臂植入式中心静脉导管装置的聚氨酯导管与硅胶导管的比较
Eur J Cancer. 2016 May;59:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
5
Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.经头静脉行中心静脉置管,应用导管尖端位置的血管内电描记法进行控制:单中心 316 例经验。
World J Urol. 2012 Jun;30(3):399-404. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0752-6. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
6
Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.外周置入中心静脉导管与植入式港静脉导管在癌症患者中的临床影响:一项开放标签、随机、两中心试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):734-741. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.038. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
7
Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.在前臂植入的中心静脉通路端口装置的放射学引导插入术的短期和长期结果:对1704例患者的回顾性单中心分析
Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):606-16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3417-1. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
8
Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications.对因并发症而取出的放射学植入式中心静脉导管系统的评估。
J Vasc Access. 2011 Oct-Dec;12(4):306-12. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2011.7739.
9
Standardized procedure prevents perioperative and early complications in totally implantable venous-access ports-a complication analysis of more than 1000 TIVAP implantations.标准化程序可预防完全植入式静脉输液港的围手术期和早期并发症——1000 多例 TIVAP 植入术的并发症分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec;407(8):3755-3762. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02656-9. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.外周静脉输液港:109例患者的结果分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 May-Jun;23(3):187-93. doi: 10.1007/s002700010041.

引用本文的文献

1
Pacemaker leads as a potential source of problems in patients who might need a central venous access port.对于可能需要中心静脉通路端口的患者,起搏器导线可能是问题的一个潜在来源。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Dec 15;13(6):1068-1079. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-104. Epub 2023 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications of central venous port systems: a pictorial review.中心静脉端口系统的并发症:图文综述
Insights Imaging. 2019 Aug 28;10(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0770-2.
2
A review of bispecific antibodies and antibody constructs in oncology and clinical challenges.双特异性抗体及抗体构建物在肿瘤学中的综述及临床挑战
Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Sep;201:103-119. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
The catheter to vein ratio and rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a prospective cohort study.
经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)患者的导管与静脉比和症状性静脉血栓栓塞发生率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Mar;52(3):677-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
4
Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.在前臂植入的中心静脉通路端口装置的放射学引导插入术的短期和长期结果:对1704例患者的回顾性单中心分析
Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):606-16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3417-1. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
5
New perspective for nutritional support of cancer patients: Enteral/parenteral nutrition.癌症患者营养支持的新视角:肠内/肠外营养
Exp Ther Med. 2011 Jul;2(4):675-684. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.247. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
6
Identification of risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in patients with totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm.前臂完全植入式静脉通路端口患者导管相关血栓形成的危险因素识别
J Vasc Access. 2012 Jan-Mar;13(1):79-85. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000003.
7
Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients.前臂外周完全植入式静脉通道端口系统:763 例连续患者的临床经验。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Dec;33(6):1159-67. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9854-6. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
8
Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients?: analysis of a large bi-institutional experience.肿瘤患者手臂端口的放射学放置是必需的吗?:基于大型双机构经验的分析
Cancer. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):2331-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23040.
9
Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence.肿瘤学中静脉输液港系统的管理:当前证据综述
Ann Oncol. 2008 Jan;19(1):9-15. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm272. Epub 2007 Sep 9.
10
Population aging and cancer: a cross-national concern.人口老龄化与癌症:一个跨国关注的问题。
Cancer J. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(6):437-41. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200511000-00002.