• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入的中心静脉置管取出失败的风险因素。

Risk factors for unsuccessful removal of central venous access ports implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tokushima Red Cross Hospital, 103, Irinokuchi Komatsushima-cho, Komatsushima, Tokushima, 773-8502, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Tokushima, 770-8509, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2022 Apr;40(4):412-418. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01214-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11604-021-01214-5
PMID:34779983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8977265/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk factors for unsuccessful removal of a central venous access port (CV port) implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 97 adult oncologic patients (51 males, 46 females; age range, 30-88 years; mean age, 63.7 years) in whom removal of a CV port implanted in the forearm was attempted at our hospital between January 2015 and May 2021. Gender, age at removal, body mass index, and diagnosis were examined as patient characteristics; and indwelling period, indwelling side, and indication for removal were examined as factors associated with removal of a CV port. These variables were compared between successful and unsuccessful cases using univariate analysis. Then, multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for unsuccessful removal of a CV port using variables with a significant difference in the univariate analysis. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn for significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis and the Youden index was used to determine the optimum cut-off value for predicting unsuccessful removal of a CV port.

RESULTS

Removal of CV ports was successful in 79 cases (81.4%), but unsuccessful in 18 cases (18.6%) due to fixation of the catheter to the vessel wall. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the indwelling period (odds ratio 1.048; 95% confidence interval 1.026-1.070; P < 0.0001) was a significant independent risk factor for unsuccessful removal of a CV port. ROC analysis showed that the cut-off value for successful removal was 41 months, and 54% of cases with an indwelling period > 60 months had unsuccessful removal.

CONCLUSION

The indwelling period is an independent risk factor for unsuccessful removal of a CV port implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients, with a cut-off of 41 months.

摘要

目的

评估成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入中心静脉通路(CV 端口)拔除失败的危险因素。

材料与方法

本研究纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月在我院尝试拔除前臂植入 CV 端口的 97 例成年肿瘤科患者(男 51 例,女 46 例;年龄 30-88 岁,平均 63.7 岁)。患者特征包括性别、拔除时年龄、体重指数和诊断;与 CV 端口拔除相关的因素包括留置期、留置侧和拔除指征。采用单因素分析比较成功组和失败组之间的这些变量。然后,采用多因素分析识别单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的 CV 端口拔除失败的独立危险因素。对多因素分析中的显著危险因素绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并使用约登指数确定预测 CV 端口拔除失败的最佳截断值。

结果

79 例(81.4%)成功拔除 CV 端口,但 18 例(18.6%)因导管与血管壁固定而失败。多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,留置时间(优势比 1.048;95%置信区间 1.026-1.070;P < 0.0001)是 CV 端口拔除失败的显著独立危险因素。ROC 分析显示,成功拔除的截断值为 41 个月,留置时间>60 个月的 54%病例拔除失败。

结论

成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入 CV 端口的留置时间是拔除失败的独立危险因素,截断值为 41 个月。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39e6/8977265/a427f13e1fb7/11604_2021_1214_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39e6/8977265/02035c654b50/11604_2021_1214_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39e6/8977265/a427f13e1fb7/11604_2021_1214_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39e6/8977265/02035c654b50/11604_2021_1214_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39e6/8977265/a427f13e1fb7/11604_2021_1214_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for unsuccessful removal of central venous access ports implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients.成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入的中心静脉置管取出失败的风险因素。
Jpn J Radiol. 2022 Apr;40(4):412-418. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01214-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
[Long-term outcomes and complications of upper arm central venous access ports].[上臂中心静脉置管端口的长期结局与并发症]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2013 Mar;40(3):331-5.
3
Risk factors assessment for radiographically guided port implantations with forearm access.经前臂入路行影像学引导下端口植入的风险因素评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 26;16(10):e0259127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259127. eCollection 2021.
4
Risk Factors for Early Port Infections in Adult Oncologic Patients.成年肿瘤患者早期端口感染的危险因素
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1427-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Long-term Outcome of Peripherally Implanted Venous Access Ports in the Forearm in Female Cancer Patients.女性癌症患者前臂外周植入式静脉输液港的长期疗效
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;38(3):657-64. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0975-1. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
6
Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.外周静脉输液港:109例患者的结果分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 May-Jun;23(3):187-93. doi: 10.1007/s002700010041.
7
Incidence and risk factors of symptomatic venous thromboembolism related to implanted ports in cancer patients.癌症患者植入式静脉输液港相关症状性静脉血栓栓塞症的发生率及危险因素。
Thromb Res. 2014 Jan;133(1):30-3. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.10.026. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
8
[Failure to Remove Long-Term Indwelling Central Venous Catheters in Two Patients].[两例患者长期留置中心静脉导管未拔除]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2015 Sep;42(9):1127-30.
9
Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.在前臂植入的中心静脉通路端口装置的放射学引导插入术的短期和长期结果:对1704例患者的回顾性单中心分析
Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):606-16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3417-1. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
10
Contrast examination of central venous access port implanted through internal jugular vein for evaluation of suspected complications.经颈内静脉植入中心静脉输液港的对比检查用于疑似并发症的评估。
Jpn J Radiol. 2021 Nov;39(11):1103-1110. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01142-4. Epub 2021 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
[Clinical Practice and Quality Control Guidelines for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients (2024)].《癌症患者完全植入式静脉输液港临床实践与质量控制指南(2024年)》
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Mar 20;56(2):400-410. doi: 10.12182/20250360602.
2
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.肿瘤学中中央静脉通路装置的术语、并发症和移除原因:范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.
3
Pacemaker leads as a potential source of problems in patients who might need a central venous access port.

本文引用的文献

1
Unsuccessful removal of a totally implantable venous access port caused by thrombosis in the left brachiocephalic vein: A case report.因左头臂静脉血栓形成导致完全植入式静脉通路端口取出失败:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(13):e14985. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014985.
2
Infections Related to Totally Implantable Venous-Access Ports: Long-Term Experience in One Center.与完全植入式静脉输液港相关的感染:单中心长期经验
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015 May;72(1):235-40. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-0443-1.
3
Retained central venous lines (CVLs) after attempted removal: an 11-year series and literature review.
对于可能需要中心静脉通路端口的患者,起搏器导线可能是问题的一个潜在来源。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Dec 15;13(6):1068-1079. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-104. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Minimal invasive aortic arch repair with suture-mediated closure system.使用缝线介导闭合系统的微创主动脉弓修复术。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Sep 29;9(4):101337. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101337. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
A case of percutaneous retrieval of a catheter without a free end that was fractured during a totally implantable venous access port removal.一例在完全植入式静脉通路端口移除过程中发生断裂且无游离端的导管经皮取出病例。
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 Jun 16;18(9):2911-2917. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.05.046. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Application of cumulative summation (CUSUM) method and mathematical model to evaluate the learning effect in central venous catheter port implantation.应用累积求和(CUSUM)方法和数学模型评估中心静脉导管植入端口的学习效果。
Jpn J Radiol. 2022 Jun;40(6):645-646. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01242-1. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
试图移除后遗留的中心静脉导管(CVLs):一项 11 年的系列研究和文献回顾。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Sep;48(9):1887-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.050.
4
Retained intravascular fragments after removal of indwelling central venous catheters: a single institution experience.留置中心静脉导管拔除后血管内残片的保留:单中心经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jul;45(7):1491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.001.
5
Retained catheter: a rare complication associated with totally implantable venous ports.导管留置:一种与全植入式静脉输液港相关的罕见并发症。
J Vasc Access. 2010 Apr-Jun;11(2):159-61. doi: 10.1177/112972981001100214.
6
A multiinstitutional review of central venous line complications: retained intravascular fragments.一项关于中心静脉导管并发症的多机构综述:血管内残留碎片
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 May;44(5):972-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.033.
7
The catheter is stuck: complications experienced during removal of a totally implantable venous access device. A single-center study in 200 children.导管卡住:完全植入式静脉通路装置取出过程中遇到的并发症。一项针对200名儿童的单中心研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Oct;41(10):1694-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.065.
8
Jugular vein catheter placement: histologic features and development of catheter-related (fibrin) sheaths in a swine model.颈静脉导管置入:猪模型中导管相关(纤维蛋白)鞘的组织学特征及形成
Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):427-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402031129.
9
Long-term central venous access.
Br J Anaesth. 2004 May;92(5):722-34. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh109. Epub 2004 Mar 5.
10
Histologic changes in the human vein wall adjacent to indwelling central venous catheters.留置中心静脉导管附近人体静脉壁的组织学变化。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Pt 1):1163-8. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000086531.86489.4c.