Suppr超能文献

成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入的中心静脉置管取出失败的风险因素。

Risk factors for unsuccessful removal of central venous access ports implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tokushima Red Cross Hospital, 103, Irinokuchi Komatsushima-cho, Komatsushima, Tokushima, 773-8502, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Tokushima, 770-8509, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2022 Apr;40(4):412-418. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01214-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk factors for unsuccessful removal of a central venous access port (CV port) implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 97 adult oncologic patients (51 males, 46 females; age range, 30-88 years; mean age, 63.7 years) in whom removal of a CV port implanted in the forearm was attempted at our hospital between January 2015 and May 2021. Gender, age at removal, body mass index, and diagnosis were examined as patient characteristics; and indwelling period, indwelling side, and indication for removal were examined as factors associated with removal of a CV port. These variables were compared between successful and unsuccessful cases using univariate analysis. Then, multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for unsuccessful removal of a CV port using variables with a significant difference in the univariate analysis. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn for significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis and the Youden index was used to determine the optimum cut-off value for predicting unsuccessful removal of a CV port.

RESULTS

Removal of CV ports was successful in 79 cases (81.4%), but unsuccessful in 18 cases (18.6%) due to fixation of the catheter to the vessel wall. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the indwelling period (odds ratio 1.048; 95% confidence interval 1.026-1.070; P < 0.0001) was a significant independent risk factor for unsuccessful removal of a CV port. ROC analysis showed that the cut-off value for successful removal was 41 months, and 54% of cases with an indwelling period > 60 months had unsuccessful removal.

CONCLUSION

The indwelling period is an independent risk factor for unsuccessful removal of a CV port implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients, with a cut-off of 41 months.

摘要

目的

评估成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入中心静脉通路(CV 端口)拔除失败的危险因素。

材料与方法

本研究纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月在我院尝试拔除前臂植入 CV 端口的 97 例成年肿瘤科患者(男 51 例,女 46 例;年龄 30-88 岁,平均 63.7 岁)。患者特征包括性别、拔除时年龄、体重指数和诊断;与 CV 端口拔除相关的因素包括留置期、留置侧和拔除指征。采用单因素分析比较成功组和失败组之间的这些变量。然后,采用多因素分析识别单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的 CV 端口拔除失败的独立危险因素。对多因素分析中的显著危险因素绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并使用约登指数确定预测 CV 端口拔除失败的最佳截断值。

结果

79 例(81.4%)成功拔除 CV 端口,但 18 例(18.6%)因导管与血管壁固定而失败。多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,留置时间(优势比 1.048;95%置信区间 1.026-1.070;P < 0.0001)是 CV 端口拔除失败的显著独立危险因素。ROC 分析显示,成功拔除的截断值为 41 个月,留置时间>60 个月的 54%病例拔除失败。

结论

成人肿瘤科患者前臂植入 CV 端口的留置时间是拔除失败的独立危险因素,截断值为 41 个月。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39e6/8977265/02035c654b50/11604_2021_1214_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

4
Risk Factors for Early Port Infections in Adult Oncologic Patients.成年肿瘤患者早期端口感染的危险因素
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1427-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.外周静脉输液港:109例患者的结果分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 May-Jun;23(3):187-93. doi: 10.1007/s002700010041.

引用本文的文献

4
Minimal invasive aortic arch repair with suture-mediated closure system.使用缝线介导闭合系统的微创主动脉弓修复术。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Sep 29;9(4):101337. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101337. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

9
Long-term central venous access.
Br J Anaesth. 2004 May;92(5):722-34. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh109. Epub 2004 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验