• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在仿骨股骨模型中比较使用加压接骨板与磁力延长钉产生的力。

Comparison of forces generated using compression plating versus a magnetic lengthening nail in a sawbones femur model.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Dec;90:105508. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105508. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105508
PMID:34700236
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to compare compression generated by a Precice magnetic lengthening intramedullary nail and a 5.0 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate.

METHODS

Transverse osteotomy sites were created in the femoral shaft of ten Sawbones fourth generation composite femurs. Antegrade 10-degree trochanteric Precice nails and 8-hole, 5.0 mm plates were used for fixation. The plates were compressed by placing a neutral screw and three eccentrically drilled compression screws on alternating sides of the osteotomy. Average compression and distribution of compression were compared, and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

FINDINGS

The Precice nail generated an average of 2.38 megapascal across the osteotomy sites. The plate generated an average of 0.70 megapascal (P < 0.001) with the initial compression screw, 0.93 megapascal (P < 0.001) after the second screw, and 1.04 megapascal (p < 0.001) after the final screw. The distribution of compression was assessed utilizing a polar transformation to compare pressure values. We found that the distribution of compression was more circumferentially uniform in the Precice nail group (P = 0.046).

INTERPRETATION

This study demonstrates that an electromagnetic intramedullary device is capable of generating significantly higher compression, in a more uniform distribution, than a 5.0 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate in a Sawbones model. The results indicate that electromagnetic intramedullary nail systems may be an ideal alternative to compression plating for treatment of at-risk fractures, nonunions, delayed unions, and intercalary allograft reconstruction.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较 Precice 磁性延长髓内钉和 5.0mm 有限接触动力加压板产生的压缩力。

方法

在十个 Sawbones 第四代复合材料股骨的股骨干上创建横向骨折部位。采用顺行 10 度转子 Precice 钉和 8 孔 5.0mm 钢板进行固定。通过在骨折部位的对侧交替放置中立螺钉和三个偏心钻孔的压缩螺钉来压缩钢板。比较平均压缩力和压缩分布,P 值<0.05 认为具有统计学意义。

发现

Precice 钉在骨折部位产生的平均压缩力为 2.38 兆帕斯卡。钢板初始压缩螺钉产生的平均压缩力为 0.70 兆帕斯卡(P<0.001),第二个螺钉为 0.93 兆帕斯卡(P<0.001),最后一个螺钉为 1.04 兆帕斯卡(p<0.001)。利用极坐标变换评估压缩分布,我们发现 Precice 钉组的压缩分布更具圆周均匀性(P=0.046)。

结论

本研究表明,电磁髓内装置能够在 Sawbones 模型中产生比 5.0mm 有限接触动力加压板更高的压缩力,且分布更均匀。结果表明,电磁髓内钉系统可能是治疗高危骨折、骨不连、延迟愈合和节段性同种异体骨重建的理想选择。

相似文献

1
Comparison of forces generated using compression plating versus a magnetic lengthening nail in a sawbones femur model.在仿骨股骨模型中比较使用加压接骨板与磁力延长钉产生的力。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Dec;90:105508. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105508. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
Changes in the femoral osteotomy level coefficient and neck shaft angle during limb lengthening with an intramedullary magnetic nail.使用髓内磁性钉进行肢体延长过程中股骨截骨水平系数和颈干角的变化
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1739-1742. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03740-9. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
The early failure of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw in femurs with a wide medullary canal. A biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures.Gamma钉和动力髋螺钉在髓腔宽大的股骨中早期失效:转子间骨折的生物力学研究
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Jan;71:201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate.股骨髁上骨折固定的比较生物力学分析:锁定髓内钉与95度角钢板
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Jul;11(5):344-50. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199707000-00008.
5
STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening.STRYDE 与 PRECICE 磁内延长钉在股骨延长中的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3555-3561. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03943-8. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
A comparison of compressive force generation by plating and intramedullary nailing techniques in a transverse diaphyseal humerus fracture model.在横形肱骨干骨折模型中钢板固定技术与髓内钉固定技术产生压缩力的比较。
J Trauma. 2008 Jul;65(1):103-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181568ce7.
7
Combined antegrade femur lengthening and distal deformity correction: a case series.股骨近端延长与远端畸形矫正联合应用:病例系列报告。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02168-6.
8
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.用于成人髋关节囊外骨折的伽马钉及其他髁头髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub4.
9
Femoral Lengthening in Children: A Comparison of Motorized Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Fixation Techniques.儿童股骨延长术:机动髓内钉与外固定技术的比较。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022;42(5):253-259. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002120.
10
The PRECICE magnetic IM compression nail for long bone nonunions: a preliminary report.PRECICE 磁力 IM 压缩钉治疗长骨骨不连:初步报告。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Nov;139(11):1551-1560. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03225-4. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanics of dynamic compression plate application in fracture fixation.动力加压接骨板在骨折固定中的力学应用。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2024 Mar;113:106209. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106209. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
Clinical compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic intramedullary nails: a feasibility study.磁共振成像与髓内磁钉临床兼容性:一项可行性研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Apr;144(4):1503-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05210-y. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Finite element modeling of fracture compression by compression plates.
骨折加压接骨板断裂的有限元建模。
J Orthop Res. 2024 May;42(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1002/jor.25759. Epub 2023 Dec 13.