• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像与髓内磁钉临床兼容性:一项可行性研究。

Clinical compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic intramedullary nails: a feasibility study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 1520 San Pablo St., Suite 2000, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.

Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Apr;144(4):1503-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05210-y. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05210-y
PMID:38353685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10965604/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail in place is contraindicated per the manufacturer due to the concern of implant activation and migration. A prior in vitro study did not confirm these complications only noting that a 3.0 T MRI weakened the internal magnet. Therefore, a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic nail in place was performed to determine if any adverse effects occurred in the clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic lengthening nail in place was performed. The time spent being imaged in the MRI, number of times the patient entered the MRI suite, and the images obtained were recorded. Radiographs were performed before and after the MRI to determine if any hardware complications occurred. The patients were monitored for any adverse symptoms while they were in the suite.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients with 13 nails were identified. Two patients underwent imaging with a 3.0 T MRI while the remaining 10 underwent imaging with a 1.5 T MRI. Each patient entered the MRI suite 2.1 times and spent an average of 84.7 min being imaged in the MRI (range 21-494). No patients noted any adverse symptoms related to the nail while in the suite and no hardware complications were identified.

CONCLUSION

MRI appears to be safe with a magnetic nail in place and did not result in any complications. Given the manufacturer's recommendations, informed consent should be obtained prior to an MRI being performed and a 3.0 T MRI should be avoided when possible if further activation of the nail is required.

摘要

介绍

由于担心植入物激活和迁移,制造商禁止在有内置髓内延长钉的情况下使用磁共振成像(MRI)。先前的一项体外研究并未证实这些并发症,仅指出 3.0T MRI 会削弱内置磁铁的磁力。因此,对接受 MRI 检查且内置磁钉的患者进行了回顾性分析,以确定在临床环境中是否发生任何不良影响。

材料和方法

对所有接受内置磁钉 MRI 检查的患者进行了回顾性分析。记录了在 MRI 中的成像时间、患者进入 MRI 套房的次数以及获得的图像。在 MRI 前后拍摄 X 光片,以确定是否发生任何硬件并发症。监测患者在套房中是否有任何不良症状。

结果

共确定了 12 例患者的 13 枚钉。2 例患者进行了 3.0T MRI 成像,其余 10 例患者进行了 1.5T MRI 成像。每位患者进入 MRI 套房 2.1 次,平均在 MRI 中成像 84.7 分钟(范围 21-494 分钟)。没有患者在套房中出现与钉子相关的任何不良症状,也未发现任何硬件并发症。

结论

MRI 似乎在有内置磁钉的情况下是安全的,不会导致任何并发症。鉴于制造商的建议,在进行 MRI 检查之前应获得知情同意,如果需要进一步激活钉子,应尽可能避免使用 3.0T MRI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f1/10965604/eb0f18916b5b/402_2024_5210_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f1/10965604/df83191fd8bc/402_2024_5210_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f1/10965604/e74b089419d6/402_2024_5210_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f1/10965604/eb0f18916b5b/402_2024_5210_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f1/10965604/df83191fd8bc/402_2024_5210_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f1/10965604/e74b089419d6/402_2024_5210_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f1/10965604/eb0f18916b5b/402_2024_5210_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic intramedullary nails: a feasibility study.磁共振成像与髓内磁钉临床兼容性:一项可行性研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Apr;144(4):1503-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05210-y. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
2
A clinical and radiological matched-pair analysis of patients treated with the PRECICE and STRYDE magnetically driven motorized intramedullary lengthening nails.一项对接受PRECICE和STRYDE磁驱动电动髓内延长钉治疗的患者进行的临床和影像学配对分析。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Jan;105-B(1):88-96. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B1.BJJ-2022-0755.R1.
3
What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?使用磁驱动顺行髓内延长钉进行股骨延长治疗肢体长度差异的潜在益处和风险有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Apr 1;480(4):790-803. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002036.
4
The role of the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening.髓内植入物在肢体延长中的作用。
Injury. 2017 Jun;48 Suppl 1:S52-S58. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
5
STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening.STRYDE 与 PRECICE 磁内延长钉在股骨延长中的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3555-3561. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03943-8. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails and MRI Compatibility.磁性髓内延长钉与磁共振成像兼容性
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Nov/Dec;38(10):e584-e587. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001236.
7
Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX(®))-preliminary results.使用完全可植入的磁驱动机械钉(PHENIX(®))进行肢体延长——初步结果。
Injury. 2014 Jan;45 Suppl 1:S60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.029. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
8
Limb Lengthening With Precice Intramedullary Lengthening Nails in Children and Adolescents.肢体延长术与 Precice 髓内延长钉在儿童和青少年中的应用。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Feb 1;42(2):e192-e200. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002016.
9
An update on the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening: A quinquennial review Part 1: The further influence of the intramedullary nail in limb lengthening.断骨增高术髓内植入物的最新进展:五年度回顾 第 1 部分:髓内钉在肢体延长中的进一步影响。
Injury. 2022 Nov;53 Suppl 3:S81-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
10
Femoral lengthening using the Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system: outcome comparison following antegrade and retrograde nails.采用 Precice 髓内肢体延长系统进行股骨延长:顺行和逆行钉术后结果比较。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1168-1176. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1271.R1.

本文引用的文献

1
An update on the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening: A quinquennial review Part 1: The further influence of the intramedullary nail in limb lengthening.断骨增高术髓内植入物的最新进展:五年度回顾 第 1 部分:髓内钉在肢体延长中的进一步影响。
Injury. 2022 Nov;53 Suppl 3:S81-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Technical considerations and early results of magnetic compressive intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft delayed unions and nonunions.肱骨干延迟愈合和不愈合的磁性加压髓内钉固定技术要点及早期结果
JSES Int. 2022 Jan 17;6(3):385-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.022. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators.
儿童在 distraction osteogenesis 期间的生活质量:髓内磁延长钉和外固定器的比较。
Int Orthop. 2022 Jun;46(6):1367-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05399-w. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Technical considerations for the management of segmental osseous defects with an internal bone transport nail.使用骨内运输钉治疗节段性骨缺损的技术考量
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022 Mar;19(3):203-211. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2054336. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
5
Off-label usage of RhBMP-2 in posterior cervical fusion is not associated with early increased complication rate and has similar clinical outcomes.在后路颈椎融合术中使用 RhBMP-2 属于标签外使用,但并不与早期并发症发生率增加相关,且具有相似的临床结果。
Spine J. 2022 Jul;22(7):1079-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Complications in Elective Removal of 271 Bone Lengthening Nails (FITBONE, PRECICE and STRYDE).271枚骨延长钉(FITBONE、PRECICE和STRYDE)择期取出的并发症
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2021 May-Aug;16(2):110-115. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1529.
7
Limb Lengthening With Precice Intramedullary Lengthening Nails in Children and Adolescents.肢体延长术与 Precice 髓内延长钉在儿童和青少年中的应用。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Feb 1;42(2):e192-e200. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002016.
8
Comparison of forces generated using compression plating versus a magnetic lengthening nail in a sawbones femur model.在仿骨股骨模型中比较使用加压接骨板与磁力延长钉产生的力。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Dec;90:105508. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105508. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
9
Biologic Reconstruction With a Motorized Intramedullary Bone Transport Nail After Tumor Resection.肿瘤切除术后使用电动髓内骨搬运钉进行生物重建。
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Oct 1;35(Suppl 4):S25-S30. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002118.
10
Plate-Assisted Bone Segment Transport Versus Precice Bone Transport Nail.骨段搬运接骨板与 Precice 骨搬运钉的比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Oct 1;35(Suppl 4):S19-S24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002123.